How the American Legal System Creates Deadbeat Dads

"With all that has happened to you, you should write a book."

Jack Dalton, the ex-wife's first attorney of record in our divorce.

The book took me six years to write. Many times, due to the emotional stress of reliving and remembering what took place during my divorce, I would literally have to push myself away from the desk and my keyboard and go away from the difficult task of writing this book, sometimes not to resume writing for days, weeks and even months. 

Available here:
Deadbeat Dad

 

"You're the best pro-se litigant I have had in my courtroom in the 27 years I've been on the bench .... I don't give reasons, I give rulings. Now, sit down and shut-up. If I hear another word out out of you, I'll find you in contempt of court."

The "Honorable" Judge John E. Buffington, Humboldt County California Superior Court

From the reviews:

By drusher

Jan 18, 2009

"Deadbeat Dads are real" Charles Fockaert has accurately and unemotionally documented in great detail what the divorce system did to him. This book is unusual in that it is a fully-cited documentary containing full source material and names of individuals in the divorce system.. This sets it apart from other books consisting mostly of rants or anecdote. This book is also unusual in that it names the individuals who abuse the system, and documents exactly what they did. Charles suffered just about every possible perversion practiced by the family courts. The richness of the situation first made me ask myself "how could anyone handle this without going nuts?" Those who are not aware of the vagaries of the divorce system should read this book. This book is an accurate, microcosmic view of what goes in every day in divorce courts across America. The people identified in the book do not like like it. They better get used to not liking it because the men's movement is here to stay. Those who think they can make a living destroying fathers for arbitrary or false reasons better get another job, unless of course, they want to be subject of a much larger documentary which is sure to take place in the future. David R. Usher Senior Policy Analyst True Equality Network.

Read More...

Summary only...

Scofield Reference Bible Deception

I've had basically one bible my entire Christian life, over 35 years. I've spent countless hours reading it, studying it, making notes in the margins, teaching from it and "thumping" people on the head with it. And yet, no book has caused me more confusion than the Scofield Reference Bible.

Little did I know that my confusion was in large part the result of so-called Christian seminaries and so-called Christian leaders, some of whom are listed on the frontispiece of this reference Bible, using Scofield's work, wittingly and unwittingly, to lead astray countless millions of Christians for over 100 years now, myself included. How could such a deception go undiscovered for so long by so many who should have known better? It was not until my coming to understand the DSCI view of Scripture, was my confusion removed. Surely, these Christian leaders will be among those to whom the Lord will say, "Depart from me, I never knew you."

The fact is, the Zionist jew Samuel Untermyer was the go between - between Scofield and the Zionist backers, alleged to be the Secret Six - that enabled a true deadbeat dad - Scofield - to produce the work that bears his name. This infamous Bible reference work [which is in fact Oxford Press' property, another deception], and has been used to deceive so many, for so long, should be enough proof for any one with a working brain cell to realize the extent to which the so-called jews [Revelation 2:9; 3:9] have gone in their deception of their number one enemy, the people of Yahweh. And, the fact that so many Christian leaders of so many denominations have been a part of this deception, should be a warning to any who love the truth; these men are not men of God.

My prayer is that millions of Christians wake up to the fact that they have been deceived by Scofield, by Oxford Press, the men listed as members of the editorial committee and the many scoundrels in sheep's clothing, e.g., Hagee and Robertson, who continue to propagate the false claims found within the pages of the Zionist financed Scofield Reference Bible.

More on Scofield
"Data collected by Clifton Emahiser on the creator of the Scofield Bible and a thousand false doctrines, presented here in a single PDF file for research purposes. Scofield and his labors were bought & paid for by Edomite-jew bankers, and he did their bidding well."
Scofield Data

Read More...

Summary only...

The Deadbeat Dad State and Child Support

_____________________________________

As mentioned in the missive, The Marriage License, once a couple marry, and get a government issued marriage license, they "enter into a three party contract - the man, the woman and the State. By getting permission to marry from the State, the man and wife - the married couple - voluntarily grant legal jurisdiction to the State [a corporation] over their marriage, that is, the marriage is a creation of the State and the couple grant the State authority over the entity the State creates - the marriage."

From that marriage license the State now "owns" the couple and any "fruit" of their marriage union, for example, any children that result from their marriage. Yes, when a couple enter into a three party adhesion contract with the State, the State "owns" any resulting children.

If the State owns the children, why then is a man, when "his" children are taken from him and given to their mother, i.e., the mother has custody, obligated to pay child support to the mother, when the children are not his, but the State's?

The answer is, he's not obligated. Although he is the biological father - the children are not his, they are the State's. The State does it's best to get the father to pay child support to the mother, and if the father goes along, usually feeling obligated, after all, they are "his" children, all the better. But if they are the dad's children, why and how can the State take them away and give them exclusively to the mother?

The State can do this because the reality is, the children are the State's - not the dad's - by virtue of the marriage license voluntarily entered into - and the State can do what they want with their "property," in this case, the children.

The further reality is, when the State takes children from the father and gives them to the mother, [who usually can not adequately support the children - if they could, they wouldn't need child support would they?] it is the State that is the deadbeat dad, because it is the State that is not supporting "their" children, not the biological dad.

Find this revelation hard to believe? Look in Merriam-Webster's Dictionary. Certificate

Etymology:
Middle English certificat, from Medieval Latin certificatum, from Late Latin, neuter of certificatus, past participle of certificare to certify
Date:
15th century

3. a document evidencing ownership or debt, e.g. a stock certificate>

or a Marriage Certificate or a Birth Certificate.
________________________________





When we get a Marriage License, Marriage Certificate or Birth Certificate, it is evidence that the government owns us. We are their slave, and collateral for their debts.

For more on how the State takes children from their dads, and dads from their children, read Deadbeat Dad http://www.lulu.com/content/315711

"Destroy the family, you destroy the country." Lenin, Vladimir Ilyich

Had we maintained the Biblical institution of marriage as between the man, the woman and God, by not going to the State for a marriage license or marriage certificate, the State would not be a party to the marriage. Not being a party to the marriage, the State would have no jurisdiction over the results of the marriage, i.e. children. Therefore, if the State tries to interfere with the marriage in any way, e.g. try to take the children from the father, the father would be within his God given rights as delineated in the Constitution, i.e., the right to life, liberty and property, to legally argue that the State has no jurisdiction in the matter. The divorce would be strictly between him and his wife.

Are you beginning to understand why our Jewish controlled government has been doing everything they can to get and keep God out of our lives? They are doing everything they can to replace God with themselves as our Masters, using every available means of deception.

Read More...

Summary only...