The Evil of Those Soon to be Stubble

The evil of those soon to be stubble (Obadiah 18) is so far beyond the ability of most naive, gullible, so easily duped Whites to comprehend, they have the illusion of "that can't happen here" while suffering from a little discussed type of bias, normalcy bias. The deception has been so far reaching, it boggles the White mind. Whites have the problem of projecting how they are unto others who are in no way like them, and do not follow the same law we have written in our hearts.

That is why the Big Lie works: Whites simply can not believe others can and would lie so easily and on such a grand scale: eg., the holocaust. The first lie was "ye shall not surely die, for Yahweh does know, that in the day you eat thereof, then your eyes will be opened and you shall be as Yahweh, knowing good and evil." It all started at the "Tree of the Knowledge of Good AND Evil." Our race knew not evil until Nachash (the Enchanter, Magician) seduced Eve and produced Cain. Evil destroys all it touches, hence Cain, who according to Josephus was a hybridizing farmer who "forced the ground," (prelude to Monsanto) slew his brother, Abel.

This Stubble have been murderers since the beginning, and yet most Whites believe this same stubble, who would murder them in a heartbeat once given the chance, are Yahweh's Chosen. How big of a deception is that?

Read More...

Summary only...

Scofield Reference Bible Deception

A major deception promoted by the judeo-christian zionists like Hagee is found in the Scofield Reference Bible in the notes for Genesis 12:2: 

12 Now the Lord had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father's house, unto a land that I will shew thee:

² And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing:
³ And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.

"It has invariably fared ill with the people who have persecuted the Jew - well with those who have protected him. For a nation to commit the sin of anti-Semitism brings inevitable judgment." 
C. I. Scofield, notes, page 19, 1967 Edition Oxford University Press.

First off, this verse is in reference to Abram, who was not a jew. 

Second, since when is anti-Semitism a sin? No where in Scripture is this "sin" found. 

Third, since when can a nation - collectively - commit anti-Semitism? 

Fourth, jews don't descend from Shem, but from Cain/Esau, and therefore cannot be Semites. So,  how can "persecuting" the jew be anti-Semitism?

Fifth, who brings this alleged judgment upon those who "persecute" the jew? Certainly not the God of Scripture, as He says He hates Esau (Malachi 1:2), refers to the jews as being "of their father the devil" (through Cain/Esau, not Jacob/Israel - John 8:44), calls the jews the antichrists, (I John 2:18) and of the assembly of satan (the adversary) (Revelation 2:9, 3:9).

Lastly, if it has fared well with those who have protected the jew, why is the United States now in rapid decline as a nation, over $18 trillions in debt ($220 trillion if all liabilities are included)  and is being invaded with non-Whites (since the jew - Celler and Javits - promoted 1965 Immigration Act) who are turning the once great White nation into a third world cesspool? 

How well do YOU feel because your nation has "protected the jew?"

And pray tell us, how have "all the families of the earth been blessed" by the jew? The European nations, deep in debt due to Jewish control of the European Union, the Euro currency, the IMF, are collapsing - starting with Greece, to be followed soon by Spain, and Portugal with more to follow until the entire house of Jewish usury based fiat currency fails.

The one nation that told the Jews to take their banking system and stick it, Iceland, is doing just fine isn't it? So much for those who curse the jews will be cursed. The reality is the exact opposite.

Read More...

Summary only...

Are You Putting God in a Box of Your Making?

The only people I can find that Yahweh (God does have a name) made the promise of preservation to was the physical seed i.e., descendants, of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel. Genesis 15:5; 17:2-8;22: 15-18; 26:3-5.

Christians today like to separate the OT from the NT, something neither Christ nor the apostles did. Abraham is referred to in the NT some 75 times. Semantic Bible Hyper Concordance

Yahweh, as Christ, came to fulfill the promises made to the fathers, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel. Luke 1:67-74. "I have not come but for the lost sheep of the house of Israel," Matthew 15:24.

Paul and the apostles then preached the gospel message of Yahweh keeping His promise of a New Covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah, writing His law upon the hearts of His People, Israel. Jeremiah 31:31-34.

Paul was the messenger to those Israelites that left Egypt prior to the Exodus w/Moses and the giving of the Law at Mt. Sinai. Paul was also the ambassador for Christ to those Israelites that did not return to Judah after the Assyrian and Babylonian captivities, but instead migrated north and west, around the Black Sea into Galatia, Macedonia and Corinth (Greece).

These Israelites, the Nations, are referred to by Paul as the "uncircumcised." Peter was accused, along with Barnabas, of hypocrisy because they would not eat with those of the Nations, for fear of what the Judaeans would think. This is the reason for the confrontation between Paul and Peter recorded in Galatians. 2:11-16. Paul goes on to explain that Israelites are not saved by the rituals of the law, that is, circumcision, but through faith in Yahshua Christ. Galatians 2:16.

Some Christians point to this passage to support throwing the entire Old Testament Mosaic Law out the window. "We're not under law, but under grace. The Old Testament was Law, the New Testament is Grace." However, Paul is not talking about the entire OT Law in Ga. 2, only the rituals of that law, one of which was circumcision. Christ Himself told us what to think when it came to the Law. He said:  Think NOT, that I came to destroy the Law or the prophets. I did not come to destroy, but to fulfill. Matthew 5:17. How much plainer can it be said? Then why do so many think that the entire law was abolished, destroyed, done away with, in direct contradiction to what Christ said?   

More confusion results when readers don't know that Gentile is a Latin word, and should not be in an English translation of the bible. Ethnos is the original Greek word Paul used in Galatians 2:12 and 14 and should be translated Nations, as in Israelite Nations, not Gentiles, or "non-jews," as the judeo-christian cultists like Chuck Baldwin would have us believe.

Yahweh did the choosing of His People, the Israelites, "before the foundation of the world." Ephesians 1:3 There are no other people, no other family, no other tribe of people thus called. "Ye ONLY have I known of all the families of the earth;"  Amos 3:2

There are those who like to say everything changed after the cross, after the resurrection. Those same people will proclaim "God doesn't change; He is the same yesterday, today and forever," but throw that teaching out the window when confronted with passages that clearly state that it was to the Israelites, and the Israelites only, that Christ came.

Readers of Scripture need to cease from bringing preconceived ideas into Scripture. Instead, they need to use exegesis to understand what the passages under study say, and then form their understanding of what Scripture teaches, not the other way around.

Stop trying to put God into a box of your making.

Read More...

Summary only...

Flat Stone Teachers and Flat Stone Teaching

Flat Stone Teachers (FST) are those who skip over controversial passages / verses of Scripture, especially those that conflict with their current Weltanschauung.

Flat Stone Teaching is teaching that starts with a favorite passage from which an entire sermon is based and then skips from that one favorite out-of-context passage to other out-of-context passages, passages that seem to support the Flat Stone Teacher's currently held beliefs and teaching.

That is, unless one actually studies the passages in historical and biblical context and in the original - Hebrew and Greek - languages using several sources so as to conform to the Scriptural mandate of everything being supported by "two or three witnesses."

Most of the audience - and they are audiences, as they attend the "church services" to be entertained by the music director's entertainment program for that particular service - will not know or neither will they care if the teaching is as twisted as a pretzel - as long as their itching ears are scratched and the FST gets them back on their Lazy Boy, the remote and their beer before the start of their next entertainment for the day - the in season Beasts and Ball Game. And as nary a week separates one season from another now, the church goer goes from one form of entertainment to another uninterrupted.

This system has the masses worshiping the doctrine of devils, the beasts / icons of the (football) fields and the doctrine of Baal.  Meanwhile their entire culture is being destroyed and if and when they interrupt their entertainment cycle long enough to actually think about the destruction taking place around them, are completely clueless as to the cause. 

The "pastor's" flat stone teaching will keep the audience in a state of total ignorance for another week, until the next week's Judeo-Christian, ie, Scofield/Darbyism Baal doctrine of the jews being "God's Chosen" and "diversity is our strength" universalism programming is delivered.

Bring up the fact that the FST skipped right over the verse or verses that contradict what the FST was teaching, and you're immediately labeled a trouble maker, a division maker or worse. Nevermind that you can run circles around the FST and his flat stone teaching, no one wants to know what you  think.

I actually had a "leader" of a particular church tell me

The points you make seem logical – when you start with your position on Gen 3 (:15)  – but are so radically different from where I am at today that I’m not willing to simply “jump ship” so to speak and embrace them.

In other words, "how can you, even though the points you make seem logical, be right, when what you say is so radically different from what my FST teaches, and what I and everyone else believes?"

"Baaa baaa. I'm going to go with the sheeple, rather than what the Word of God says, because who are you among so many?"

Thank Yahweh that Noah, Joshua and Caleb, Jeremiah and all the rest did what Yahweh commanded them, rather than what everyone else was thinking should be done.  

Read More...

Summary only...

Scofield's False Teaching in Matthew 25

False teachings, deliberate mis-leadings and other guile are found throughout the Scofield Reference Bible. For a backdrop to this missive, other Kerux Replies has gone into more detail as to the background of Cyrus I. Scofield and his Zionist reference bible, see here and here.

One such deceptive lie is found in the footnote for Matthew 25. It reads, inter alia:

"2(25:32) This judgment of individual Gentiles is to be distinguished from other judgments in Scripture, such as ....." (page 1036 1967 edition)

First off, the word gentile was not even used by any writers of the Old or New Testament. The Greek word here (that Scofield says means "Gentiles" and is often translated "Gentile" by the KJ translators) is Strong's # 1484 ethnos - meaning a race, a people, nation; the nations. The word ethnos does not mean "gentile." Clifton Emahiser explains the misapplication of the word gentile in the Bible here. See also Bertrand Comparet's Who Are the Gentiles?

The factual short version is this:

"No Bible writer ever used the term (gentile) as there is no such word in Hebrew, Aramaic or Greek. The first time that the Latin word “gentile” ever appeared in any Bible is when Jerome translated the original manuscripts from Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek into Latin! Secondly, and more importantly, in Jerome’s day, the Latin term “gentile” (gentilis) never had today’s corrupted definition meaning “non-Jew”. The Junior Classic Latin Dictionary published by Wilcox & Follett Company in 1945 defines gentilis: “of the same clan or race”, surely a word consistent with all of Scripture (Amos 3:2, Matt. 15:24 etc.)." Emahiser

Second, the verse is not discussing individuals - singular - at all. Ethnos is races or nations, not individual "Gentiles." The subject here is nations, not individuals.

This pretzel theology is typical of the type of deception Scofield and his editors used: they twist scripture to fit their Zionist view. Unsuspecting judeo-christians, who only surface study scripture, if at all, don't realize they are being subtly deceived and manipulated by the numerous commentaries, footnotes and "helps" found throughout this widely used reference bible.

Mattew 25:31-46 reads:

³¹When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory:
³²And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats:
³³And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left.
³⁴Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world:
³⁵For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in:
³⁶Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me.
³⁷Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink?
³⁸When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee?
³⁹Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee?
⁴⁰And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.
⁴¹Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:
⁴²For I was an hungred, and ye gave me no meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me no drink:
⁴³I was a stranger, and ye took me not in: naked, and ye clothed me not: sick, and in prison, and ye visited me not.
⁴⁴Then shall they also answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, or athirst, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not minister unto thee?
⁴⁵Then shall he answer them, saying, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to me.
⁴⁶And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.

³²And before him shall be gathered all nations:

The KJ translators had to translate ethnos in this verse as nations, as gentiles would not have made any sense. To do otherwise, like they so often did in other passages, would have been an obvious error. But that didn't stop Scofield from alleging, in his footnoted "helps" from leading the unsuspecting to believe the word ethnos means "Gentile." And that didn't stop the editors of the Scofield Reference bible from continuing the deception - they retained Scofield's footnotes in their aforementioned 1967 edition from which the above quote was taken.

What deception does Scofield, and his editors, who retained the copyright to the work that bears his name, put forth?

"The subjects of this judgment are "all nations," i.e. all Gentiles (Gr. ethne) then living on earth. Three classes of individuals are mentioned: (1) sheep, saved Gentiles, (2) goats, unsaved Gentiles, and (3) brethren, the people of Israel."

No where in Scripture are sheep referred to as "saved Gentiles." In fact, Scripture plainly states that the 12 Tribes of Israel are His sheep. See Psalm 95:7, 100:3; and

"Israel is a scattered sheep." Jeremiah 50:7;

"My sheep (Israel) wandered through all the mountains, and upon every high hill: yea, my flock was scattered upon all the face of the earth, and none did search or seek after them." Ezekiel 34:6;

"I will surely assemble, O Jacob, (Israel) all of thee; I will surely gather the remnant of Israel; I will put them together as the sheep of Bozrah, as the flock in the midst of their fold: they shall make great noise by reason of the multitude of men." Micah 2:12;

It was for these sheep, referred to in the Old Testament that Yahshua came to redeem and it was to these sheep that he sent His disciples: "But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel." Matthew 10:6.

A careful reading of the Matthew 25 passage will plainly show the objective reader that it will be the different races, or nations, that will be gathered together; "when the Son of man shall come in all his glory. He shall "separate them one (race) from another (race), as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats. He shall set the sheep on his right hand and the goats on the left."

Notice the passage does not say "believers and unbelievers." Don't allow cognitive dissonance to block from your mind what Scripture states here clear and concisely: When the Son of man returns he will judge the races or nations: not unbelievers who might have been saved, not unsaved "Gentiles" who could have been saved from everlasting punishment had they only "given their heart to Jesus," as Scofield and his editors would have you believe.

Scripture was written by Israelites, for Israelites, about Israelites and to Israelites, and no one else. Judeo-christians, like Scofield, the editoral committee of Oxford University Press and the rabid Zionist John Hagee, want others to believe that it is the Edomite jews who are Yahweh's Chosen and that redemption is for everyone. Redemption is clearly for the lost sheep of the house of Israel only.

Yahshua clearly and unequivocally stated to the Canaanite women, in the very same gospel of Matthew, only ten chapters earlier, that "I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel." 15:24

It is those same lost sheep who are referred to in Matthew 25. Goats don't turn into sheep.

The other non-white, non-Adamic, non-Israelite mixed raced nations are not going to be converted, despite how many well meaning but otherwise foolish and purposely deceived missionaries waste their time, effort and their supporter's hard earned money trying to do the impossible: goats do not become sheep, tares do not become wheat and bad fish do not become good fish (Matthew 13:48).

"but cast the bad away. 49 So shall it be at the end of the world: the angels shall come forth, and sever the wicked from among the just, 50. And shall cast them into the furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth. "

Did you see that? "The wicked are among the just." Just like the tares are among the wheat and the bad fish are among the good fish. But in the end, they will be separated.

There will be wailing and gnashing of teeth because so many universalists believe that anyone and everyone can be a sheep, wheat and good fish.

^{Matthew 25: 46}And these (goats, tares and bad fish) shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous (Israelites) into life eternal.

Read More...

Summary only...