I Thessalonians 5:20, 21

Do not despise expounding of scripture, but scrutinize all things. Hold fast that which is right.

Malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium

- I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery.

____________________________________________

See also Kerux Replies at Wordpress.com where all future missives will also be posted.

However, because Wordpress charges an outrageous $59.95 a year for a video upload upgrade, videos will only be linked, not embedded.
___


Saturday, December 15, 2007

20 Things We Know

1. 9/11 was not pulled off by "19 Arabs with box cutters."
2. Millions of illegal aliens have been allowed in to the United States and Congress has even tried to grant the law breakers amnesty, but law abiding visitors and citizens must get their fingerprints and pictures taken for entry into the country.
3. Iraq did not have weapons of mass destruction.
4. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.
5. Bin Laden, except as scapegoat, had nothing to do with 9/11
6. The mainstream media is involved in covering up what actually did happen on 9/11
7. Saddam Hussein had no ties with Al Qaeda.
8. Massive fraud occurred during both the 2000 and 2004 elections.
9. Few, if any, congressmen read the Patriot Act [sic] before they signed that sweeping legislation into law.
10. The federal government has been destroying the Constitution
11. American citizens are losing their liberties.
12.. Zionista Pelosi said, immediately after the 2004 election, "impeachment is off the table."
13. Michael Chertoff, head of the largest and most intrusive federal agency - Homeland Security - is a dual Israeli/US citizen.
14. According to the NIE, Iran is not building nuclear weapons.
15. The Jewish controlled mainstream media is purposely ignoring the candidacy of Ron Paul, who would immediately pull the military out of the Middle East.
16. The Jewish controlled mainstream media is nothing more than a propaganda machine for Zionism.
17. The time is drawing near for us citizens to take action.
18. There are millions more of us then there are of them.
19. We still have the right to bear arms.
20. We may need to use those arms.

Read More...

Friday, December 14, 2007

Why Contacting Your 'Representative" is Futile

Below posted in full is a reply from my 'representative' in Congress to an email I sent telling him to impeach Bush and Cheney:

December 13, 2007

Dear Mr. Fockaert,

Thank you for contacting me regarding impeachment. I appreciate
you taking the time to share your concerns with me.

I certainly share your anger and frustration with the Bush
Administration. My record of criticism against this Administration
is extensive. From the devastating war in Iraq to the blatant attack
on our civil liberties to its harmful environmental policies, I
believe this Administration has taken our country in a dangerous
direction.

There is no doubt in my mind that this Administration is the worst
in my lifetime. However, while I have supported further study and
debate of impeachment, I believe impeachment proceedings are
not the best course of action at this time for two reasons:

First, impeachment hearings would bring our government to a
standstill for many months. Congress would be completely
consumed with the process of impeachment and we would not be
able to continue our efforts to take the country in a new direction.
Two prime examples of critical priorities that would suffer are: 1)
Our work on one the most forward-thinking energy bills in more
than 30 years and 2) Efforts to get 10 million children the
healthcare coverage they desperately need.

Second, an effort to impeach the president or vice president would
ultimately fail. Even if the House voted to initiate impeachment
proceedings, the Senate is the only body charged by the
constitution with trying impeachment. Right now, the Senate has a
very slim Democratic majority, and as a result, the Senate has been
unable to pass many important measures drafted by the Democratic
Leadership. Given its current make up, the Senate would never be
able to pass an impeachment provision. Therefore, I do not believe
we should bring our government to a standstill when we know that
impeachment would fail.

I do, however, believe it is important that we continue talking
about impeachment. This kind of discourse is what our democracy
is all about. That is why when a resolution by Congressman
Dennis Kucinich to initiate impeachment was recently brought to
the House floor, I voted in favor of the resolution because I
thought it deserved further debate. This resolution is now being
reviewed by the Judiciary Committee and I will continue to follow
its progress.

Meanwhile, Congress will continue holding the Bush
Administration accountable for its actions. Since the beginning of
this year, we have held dozens of hearings into the
Administration's actions, from the war in Iraq to the response to
Hurricane Katrina to its damaging environmental policies. If these
hearings find proof the President or the Vice President committed a
crime, then I will certainly support moving impeachment
proceedings forward in the House.

Again, thank you for sharing your passionate concerns with me.
Please continue to contact me on all issues of importance to you
and to our district.

Sincerely,

MIKE THOMPSON
Member of Congress
http://www.mikethompson.house.gov

You cannot reply to this email. If you would like to email me, please
visit
http://www.house.gov/writerep

My reply was:

Mr. Thompson,

Your words:
I certainly share your anger and frustration with the Bush
Administration. My record of criticism against this Administration
is extensive. From the devastating war in Iraq to the blatant attack
on our civil liberties to its harmful environmental policies, I
believe this Administration has taken our country in a dangerous
direction.


The Bush Administration has taken this entire country in a 'dangerous direction,' but you don't support impeachment? But some smoke a joint and get busted or break the speed limit by five mph and pay the price? Next time I have to pay the price for breaking the law, I'll try your suggestion:

"....it is important that we continue talking about"
breaking the law "as that is what our democracy is all about."

We don't have a democracy Mr. Thompson, we had a Constitutional Republic, that is until representatives like you no longer represented us because you think that you were sent to Washington to do what you think needs doing - energy bills and health care for children - [why is it you politicians always hide behind children?] - rather than doing what your constituents tell you to do - which in this case is making our leaders obey the law of our land and when they don't you take steps to remove them from office whether those attempts fail or not.

"Please continue to contact me on all issues of importance to you
and to our district."


Why should I? it does no good.

You, Mr. Thompson, work for me and based upon the foregoing are unfit to represent me and my family, as you're not fulfilling your oath of office which is to uphold and defend the Constitution of these United States.

Sincerely,

Charles Fockaert

Read More...

Thursday, December 13, 2007

Don't Own a Gun? Buy one - now

Some Christians seem to think there is something wrong with owning - and having to use - a gun. There isn't.

"When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own house, his possessions are safe." Luke 11:21

Appears to this writer, that a strong man, when fully armed, guards his house, his possessions are safe, and those possessions must include his rights, that is, his right to liberty. And liberty is why we have the right, in the US, according to the Second Amendment of Bill of Rights, to bear arms - to protect our liberties.

Jesus Christ himself spoke those words recorded by Luke about a strong man being fully armed. This idea that a Christian is some how commanded to turn his cheek forever like a revolving door is ludicrous. There comes a point in time when a man, a strong man, must and should defend himself.

"He that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one." (Luke 22:36 KJV) The Roman sword was, at the time these words were spoken by Christ Himself, the equivalent of a modern handgun. It was the most practical and convenient form of self-defense available at that time. At least two of Jesus' disciples including Simon Peter, were in the habit of carrying their own personal swords, and Jesus never rebuked them. (See Luke 22:38.)

Don't have a gun? Buy one, or two, or more - now. And enough ammunition for a long war. Better yet, buy a re-loader's kit and enough supplies to reload your weapons.

It looks like we are going to have to defend our house and our possessions - sooner rather than later.

Read More...

Thursday, November 22, 2007

US to Fingerprint Foreign Vistors But Let Illegal Immigrants Enter Without Visas

DHS to begin full fingerprint scans for visitors

The Homeland Security Department intends to begin scanning all 10 fingerprints for foreign visitors starting Nov. 29 at Dulles International Airport in Virginia, department officials said Tuesday.

Foreigners visiting the United States on visas must have a digital photograph taken and a scan of their two index fingers under the U.S. Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology program. DHS has built a database of 90 million fingerprints in the four years the program has been in operation.

Expansion to 10-finger scans, which has been in the planning stages for several years, is now beginning, Robert Mocny, U.S. Visit director, told journalists at the Foreign Press Center in Washington yesterday.

The 10-finger U.S. Visit scans are being rolled out at U.S. airports and at all land and sea border crossings, with a goal of being fully operational by the end of 2008, according to press reports of the briefing.

http://www.washingtontechnology.com/online/1_1/31856-1.html

Fingerprint the foreign visitors who actually go through the trouble to get a legal visa but allow illegal immigrants to enter our country across our unprotected borders and once they get here, the Senate tries to give them amnesty and the governor of New York wanted to give the illegals driver's licenses until we the people revolted. Anyone else see anything wrong with this picture?

Department of Homeland Security, headed by the dual Israel/US citizen Chertoff, is not trying to stop terrorism. If they were concerned about stopping terrorism, they would close the borders. Instead, our government is building a Fascist Police State and this is one more solid step in that direction.

Read More...

Wednesday, November 14, 2007

Airport screeners missed bomb parts

So goes the headline of a lead Yahoo news story. The story continues:

WASHINGTON - Government investigators smuggled liquid explosives and detonators past airport security, exposing a dangerous hole in the nation's ability to keep these forbidden items off of airplanes, according to a report made public Wednesday.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071115/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/airport_security

If this is the case, that is, government investigators are able to smuggle explosives past airport security, why aren't real terrorists getting aboard planes and committing acts of terrorism? If it's that easy to get past Transportation Safty Administration security, then why aren't all those terrorists that are supposed to be plotting to blow-up or hijack planes doing just that - smuggling bombs aboard planes and blowing them up or hijacking them?

The reason terrorist aren't doing just that is obvious: there are no terrorists within the United States who are trying to smuggle bombs aboard US flights.

Read More...

Friday, November 09, 2007

Not My Problem

There is a saying that keeps wise people out of other people's troubles: "Not my Problem" or NMP. To say there are many problems in the world today, always has been and always will be, is a gross understatement. The question is, does the problem have any thing to do with me? If not, then the problem is NMP. It's somebody else's problem. So when I read the Jewish writer Matthew Rosenberg's piece entitled, "US worries rise over Pakistan crackdown" I think to myself, what goes on in Pakistan is not USrael's problem. The problem is, USrael is sticking their unwanted nose in everyone else's problems all over the world, and oftentimes, by nosing in, create more problems - bigger problems - than if they would just keep their noses out of other people's problems.


"We remain concerned about the continued state of emergency and curtailment of basic freedoms, and urge Pakistani authorities to quickly return to constitutional order and democratic norms," Gordon Johndroe, a spokesman for the National Security Council, said in a statement.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071109/ap_on_re_as/pakistan

Can you imagine if Pakistani leaders said they were concerned about the continued rise of a fascist Police State in the US, which is indeed happening at this very moment in history, and that Pakistan was concerned about the erosion of constitutional freedoms, election fraud, illegal rendition, torture, the appointment of a torture supporting Attorney General by the torture supporting US Senate? If Pakistani leaders urged US leaders to return "constitutional order and democratic norms," the USrael leaders would go ballistic. USraeli leaders would no doubt tell the Pakistani leaders to keep their noses out of USrael internal affairs.

But when it comes to USrael sticking their long hook-noses into every country in the world because they say it concerns vital "USraeli interests" most people accept that as perfectly legitimate and virtually no one tells USrael to butt out. Why do so few tell USrael to butt out? Because of "aid."

And why is the American taxpayer giving money to Pakistan?

In Washington, where some lawmakers are calling for aid to Pakistan to be curtailed, U.S. officials again criticized Musharraf's crackdown.

USrael has gotten the US taxpayer so deep in un-repayable debt, by just this type of meddling, that is, giving "aid" to foreign countries, which are nothing more than bribes to foreign leaders. When the bribes don't work, that is, the foreign leaders don't do what USrael wants then to do, USraeli lawmakers 'call for aid to Pakistan' to be curtailed. Aid to Pakistan should never have been commenced, never mind curtailed.

USrael should keep their long hooked-noses out of every one's else's business, as their business ii none of the American citizen's business, and their problems are not our problems. Until their problems become our problems, we should take the view of wise men everywhere - "it's NMP." Or as Jefferson said, "beware of foreign entanglements."

We have enough of our own problems to deal with, and, as far as this writer can see, we're not doing too good with any of them.

Read More...

Wednesday, November 07, 2007

Original Right of Self-defense

The founding fathers envisioned the several and individual states would be an adequate obstacle to the rise of tyranny by the national, i.e. federal, government. It was their intent – with the right of individual citizens of the various states to bear arms and form militias – that the states would rise up and provide the security needed to fight any federal usurpation of power by national leaders. That, as we well know, has not been the case. The individual states, over the last several decades, have been bribed and or coerced into conceding power granted by the US Constitution to the states, under the tenth amendment, to the federal government. Therefore, we the people are left without state protection against federal despotism.

That leaves us no choice but to fall back to our “original right of self defense” as Alexander Hamilton stated in Federal Paper # 28.
federalistpapers

If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government....

There is no doubt that our representatives have betrayed us. They pass laws against our best interest – the Patriot Act, which U.S. District Judge Audrey Collins has already ruled that the ban on providing "expert advice or assistance" is impermissibly vague, and in violation of the First and Fifth Amendments of the US Constitution; the Military Commissions Act of 2006, which eliminated the right of habeas corpus, established way back in 1215, to American citizens; Public Law 109-364, or the "John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007, "allows the president to declare a "public emergency" and station troops anywhere in the United States and take control of state-based National Guard units without the consent of the governor or local authorities, in order to "suppress public disorder;" Most recently 404 members of the U.S. House of Representatives passed HR 1995 - called the 'Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007,’ which legally allows the government to label any one of us, at their discretion, a terrorist – “a radicalized homegrown terrorist” - and arrested. And let’s not forget the Senate Judiciary Committee approved for appointment for the office of attorney general of the United States, the highest official in the land charged with prosecuting criminals, Michael B. Mukasey, a man who is not sure if the same “enhanced interrogation” technique used by the Pol Pot regime in Cambodia in the 1970s - water boarding - is torture or not.

What we the people now face in these United States is a federal government that can declare anyone of us citizens a “radical homegrown terrorist” or an “enemy combatant” or both on any pretext and imprison us here in the US or flown abroad, without a writ of habeas corpus, without our families knowing where we are or what happened to us. While imprisoned, we can be water boarded in Pol Pot fashion in order to extract confessions from us regarding our alleged terrorist activities or to “re-educate” us. Meanwhile, if enough of us protest and create a “public emergency” the president, at his sole discretion, can overrule the governors of the states of these United States and commandeer the National Guard, i.e. the militia, of those States and send them, along with federal military troops, including the mercenary outfit - Blackwater - to suppress any and all dissent in any state of the union

Folks, get out of denial. What we have in the here and now in the United States is dry kindling meticulously set for martial law and the imposition of despotism.

What recourse is left for us? Alexander Hamilton also addressed that critical issue in Federalist Paper # 28.

The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair.


What Hamilton said in plain language was, when our representatives have betrayed us, we must rush tumultuously to arms, that is, without order, with an uproar, riotously, armed only with our weapons and our courage. That time has come. We must rush to arms to assert our original right of self-defense. Our way of life, our liberty is being threatened by domestic enemies, by our very own representatives, who have sold us out.

Come out of denial, stop with the self-delusion. Other than succumbing to slavery and tyranny, a rush to arms is our only and last option. Our representatives are not listening to our words. They need to be taught a history lesson, that this country was founded on the original right of self-defense.

Those of us who love liberty, aim to defend our liberty with weapons as is our right. And our duty.

Read More...

Sunday, November 04, 2007

Waterboarding Was Considered Torture by the Cambodians

If U.S. attorney general nominee Michael Mukasey needs help in deciding whether waterboarding is torture or not, perhaps he should visit the Tuol Sleng Genocide Museum in Phnom Penh Cambodia, where these photos were taken. They depict the torture technique, or as Mukasey and his ilk prefer to refer to it - "enhanced interrogation technique" - used by the Pol Pot Khmer Rouge regime.

cambodiawaterboard02

cambodiawaterboard03
cambodiawaterboard01
cambodiatuolslengmuseum

The Tuol Sleng Genocide Museum is located in the former Khmer Rouge S-21 Prison. How many years before people from around the world will visit a similar museum in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, depicting the "enhanced interrogation" technique known as waterboarding approved of and used by the Bush/Cheney Regime?

Read More...

Monday, October 29, 2007

We're in Big Trouble

404 members of the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill - HR 1995 - called the 'Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007.' These traitors are so afraid that when we finally rise up and find solutions to the problems these politicians have created, they want to be able to deal with us legally since they won't be able to deal with us morally or ethically. They will be able to legally label anyone who disagrees with them, dissents or attempts to defend themselves or even thinks about defending themselves, as a terrorist and do what they feel is necessary to prevent the rest of us from dealing with them as we should - that is, as tyrannical treasonists.

It is simple unbelievable that in the United States over 400 congressmen voted for the passage of this bill - a bill that most of us didn't even know about - that would make us, at their discretion, a terrorist - a radical homegrown terrorist.

Read bill here: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h110-1955

Sponsor - Rep. Jane Harman [D-CA]
Passed the House of Representatives October 23, 2007.

"The Internet has aided in facilitating violent radicalization, ideologically based violence, and the homegrown terrorism process in the United States by providing access to broad and constant streams of terrorist-related propaganda to United States citizens."

The facts that we are finally able to get without being vetted through the Zionist controlled media is now referred to by these traitors as "terrorist-related propaganda."

"Understanding the motivational factors that lead to violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence is a vital step toward eradicating these threats in the United States."

These traitors have started a bogus international 'war on terrorism' while at the same time refusing to fully and objectively investigate 9/11, the event which started this entire bogus war on terrorism. Now they feel there is a need for "eradicating these [homegrown terrorist] threats in the United States."

If we Americans follow the lead of our founding fathers, and invoke our right to defend our rights, even if that means invoking use of the 2nd amendment, such defensive action could and most likely would be deemed "ideologically based violence" and dealt with accordingly, quite likely with the new mercenary force the government pols are now utilizing to protect themselves, Blackwater.

"Preventing the potential rise of self radicalized, unaffiliated terrorists domestically cannot be easily accomplished solely through traditional Federal intelligence or law enforcement efforts, and can benefit from the incorporation of State and local efforts."

In other words, the government can not prevent the rise of defensive forces within the United States composed of American citizens while remaining within the limits of the US Constitution. So the government is - through HR 1955 and other unconstitutional acts such as Public Law 109-364, aka the “John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007” (HR5122) - circumventing the Constitution and planning to incorporate State and local efforts with Federal i.e. military, efforts by commandeering local law enforcement - such as the individual state National Guard units - to be utilized where they see fit, i.e. in areas where violent protests are taking place.

"Any measure taken to prevent violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence and homegrown terrorism in the United States should not violate the constitutional rights, civil rights, or civil liberties of United States citizens or lawful permanent residents."

As if these traitors care about the Constitution. This was thrown in the text to be used to continue to fool those foolish enough to believe that these traitors don't have evil intentions or for those who are simple deluded.

Over 400 members of the House of Representative are traitors. When we finally decide to rise up and do something about these tyrants - "all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security" - we will be considered radical "homegrown terrorists."

Read More...

Saturday, October 27, 2007

Terrorist Attack in Southern California

Southern California was attacked by a terrorist organization this past week.

Orange County, California (CNN) Radical Hispanic separatist organization MEchA (Movemiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan") is taking responsibility for setting the wildfires in California, confirmed Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. California Officials received a letter earlier today containing photographs of individuals holding Molotov cocktails, then throwing them into dry bush. The faces of the individuals appeared to have been digitally distorted.
This was posted on the CNN site briefly before being removed and not replaced.

Their attack resulted in over $1 billion dollars damage in San Diego county alone. The arson fires set resulted in over 1800 homes being destroyed, nearly 500,000 acres burned in an area stretching from Ventura County north of Los Angeles south to the Mexican border and east to the San Bernardino National Forest.

President Jorge W. Bush arrived in the fire scorched area to give words of comfort to the hundreds of thousands of residents evacuated from their homes."We want the people to know there's a better day ahead — that today your life may look dismal, but tomorrow life's going to be better," he said. "And to the extent that the federal government can help you, we want to do so."

Yeah, right Mr. Jorge Bush. Had you done your job in the first place, that is protect the borders of our country from the invasion of illegal immigrants, this fire may never have happened. Now, after the fact, you want to take credit for alleviating the pain and misery you could have prevented. And we haven't even brought up the billions you've wasted in Iraq and Afghanistan that could have been spent buying equipment - like helicopters - to fight this fire here on our own land. And our National Guard could of been here in our country, in our state, where they belong, fighting this fire, instead of ten thousand miles away fighting a war that you lied us into, for Israel.

Yes, Mr. Jorge Bush, this fire was started by terrorists, terrorist your administration, for the last seven years, has been allowing to invade our nation.

Read More...