I Thessalonians 5:20, 21

Do not despise expounding of scripture, but scrutinize all things. Hold fast that which is right.

Malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium

- I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery.

____________________________________________

See also Kerux Replies at Wordpress.com where all future missives will also be posted.

However, because Wordpress charges an outrageous $59.95 a year for a video upload upgrade, videos will only be linked, not embedded.
___


Friday, June 17, 2011

Swedish Racemixing State Propaganda




From the YouTube video description with corrections below:

"The government of Sweden paid for this video and is broadcasting it in Sweden and is promoting race mixing. It shows a woman having sex with a Negro while singing the Swedish National Anthem. The Jew (Hittites) are promoting this filth and soon they will be promoting this race mixing filth world wide in a more aggressive manner soon. Race mixing is a tool of the Communists that they use in order to destroy nations. "Thou shalt not commit adultery," basically forbids race mixing and sleeping with another man's wife."

The Jew (Hittites)
Jews are basically Edomites.

Race mixing is a tool of the Communists
No, race mixing is not a plot of the communists, as China is a communist nation, as is Vietnam, but we don't see them race mixing. Race mixing is being pushed by jewish interests. See here, here, here, here, here and  here.

"Thou shalt not commit adultery," basically forbids race mixing and sleeping with another man's wife." 

True, the word "adultery" is from "adulterate" which means to
: to corrupt, debase, or make impure by the addition of a foreign or inferior substance or element; especially : to prepare for sale by replacing more valuable with less valuable or inert ingredients 

but sleeping with another man's wife is taken care of in a different Commandment, "Thou shalt not covet." This commandment, "Thou shalt not commit adultery" should be understood as "Thou shalt not race mix." 

Race mixing destroys all races. 

"Race mixing is forbidden in scripture! The AntiChrist (Hittites) are trying to destroy God's original creation. The White Race is God's original creation, the first word of man in Genesis in a concordance is actually Adam, which means a Human Being, to flush, and to show blood in the face. Only the white race can flush, blush, and show blood in the face! The other races was not created by God. So people get a clue, nonwhites cannot be saved because they are the AntiChrist along with the Jew (Hittite)."

Yes, race mixing is forbidden all throughout Scripture, even in the New Testament. The word there is "fornication," or race mixing.

the first word of man in Genesis in a concordance is actually Adam, which means a Human Being, to flush, and to show blood in the face.
Yes, Adam is truly the only Man. All other races are something other than Man. This was well understood by Adamic Men up until about the 1960s when desegregation was forced upon whites in the United States. Since then, race mixing has skyrocketed along with rapes by blacks of white women.

We whites are in a war. Our race is being destroyed, and one battle we are losing is race mixing, which is producing mamzers - mulatto children, (mulatto comes from mule - the offspring of a male donkey and a female horse - a dumb infertile animal) which are less than white. Should this miscegenation proceed on course, the white race will be no more in - what - 100 years?

Our Founding Fathers knew all about the jews and race mixing:

We the (white) people of the United States, (not blacks, not Chinese, not Mexicans) in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, (white Adamic man) do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

"Our Posterity" - white posterity. The white race. The United States was founded by white people for white people, not for every other race on the planet. The same goes for Sweden and every other white nation.

nonwhites cannot be saved because they are the AntiChrist along with the Jew (Hittite).

True, nonwhites can not be saved as Yahshua Christ came ONLY for the "lost sheep of the house of Israel," also known as the 12 Tribes of Israel, which is the white race. No other race can be saved as they have not the spirit of Yahweh within them.


If you marry a non-white and produce non-white mixed race children, you are disobeying a Commandment of Yahweh, and are committing a sin that can not be forgiven, as a mix raced child can not be undone. This is the blasphemy of the Holy Spirit talked about in Scripture.

Matthew 12:31-33: 

“31 Wherefore I say unto you, All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men: but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men. 32 And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come. 33 Either make the tree good, and his fruit good; or else make the tree corrupt, and his fruit corrupt: for the tree is known by his fruit.”


"The context of this passage refers to the race-mixed Pharisees claiming that Yahshua was casting out devils by the prince of devils, Beelzebub. Because they constituted an “adulterous generation” brings the process of miscegenation into play which is our subject. One must read from verses 25 to 36 of this passage to get the gist of it." 


See more here: The Unpardonable Sin











Read More...

Thursday, June 16, 2011

Universalist Hypocrisy

Universalists like to proclaim that "all people are created equal," meaning that, other than skin color, everyone is considered by God to be the same and we whites should therefore ignore the facts of unequal achievements, accomplishments and contributions to civilization of non-whites, and regard them as equal brothers and sisters.

However, it is then these same universalists who insist that non-white minorities be given special treatment when it comes to job preferences, aka "affirmative action," housing preferences, donations and aid, from whites, whenever natural disasters strike, (but never from non-whites to whites when natural disasters strike whites), preferences awarded for university admissions, and that white nations must allow unfettered immigration of non-whites into their midst, but we never hear of any similar calls for the mixing of, let's say Koreans, or Chinese or Mexicans. No, it is always the lesser races who are to be let into white developed nations, because the want to better themselves. Why - can't they better themselves in their own non-white countries?

Obviously, they can't. Why not? Because it is non-whites who inhabit their countries, that's why. They have to migrate to white nations to have an opportunity to better themselves.

It is in white nations that opportunities for improvement exists. But as more non-whites move in, they dilute the existing white population and turn the white nation into a third world nation. We are witnessing this happening right now in the United States, a once great white nation.

The ruination of the white nations - caused in large part because of the control jews have over those nations - the more control the worse the destruction - is now causing whites to flee their nations - to find opportunity and freedom - in non-white nations. This migration will, in turn, result in more race mixing, diluting the white race further. And, just as important for these non-white nations, adulterating their nations and cultures as well.

Anyone who visits, say Thailand, can witness for themselves how the influx of foreigners into many areas of that country has diluted Thai culture. Yes, the influx of whites has brought infrastructure and other improvements paid for by their money, but at the same time the whites change the environment they migrate to: more McDonalds, more shopping malls, more fast food franchises, more of everything whites demand - to the detriment of existing Thai culture. This same change can be seen in many other third world countries, Cabo San Lucas Mexico, for one example.

Sadly, there doesn't seem to be much that can be done to reverse this tide.






Read More...

Saturday, June 11, 2011

Average White Guy Tells Truth About Multiculturalism


Read More...

Friday, June 03, 2011

All Humans Did Not Come From Adam and Eve

Despite the obvious facts, there are those universalists who insist all humans came from Adam and Eve.

Here are the facts:

1. Adam and Eve had two sons: Cain, fathered by the Seducer, the devil, and Abel.

2. Cain, a murderer from the beginning, slew Abel. If what the universalists claim is true, then that left only Adam, Eve and Cain.

3. Cain was concerned that "everyone that findeth me," call them what you will, would slay him, as he had committed the first murder. He would be the only one on the Most Wanted List of that time. Cain, with the promise given him by Yahweh, that no one would touch him, then went out from the presence of Adam and Eve and married a wife and built a city.

12When thou tillest the ground, it shall not henceforth yield unto thee her strength; a fugitive and a vagabond shalt thou be in the earth.

13And Cain said unto the LORD, My punishment is greater than I can bear.

14Behold, thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth; and from thy face shall I be hid; and I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond in the earth; and it shall come to pass, that every one that findeth me shall slay me.

15And the LORD said unto him, Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold. And the LORD set a mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him.

16And Cain went out from the presence of the LORD, and dwelt in the land of Nod, on the east of Eden.

17And Cain knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Enoch: and he builded a city, and called the name of the city, after the name of his son, Enoch.

Where did this wife come from? Where did these people come from for which a city was built?

Some want us to believe that one the future daughters (after at least 130 years) of Adam and Eve married Cain, who in fact would have been the murderer of her brother. Does anyone truly believe that one of the sisters of Abel would marry and have the children of their brother's murderer?

4. After Cain has children and builds this city, Scripture tells us that Adam and Eve had another son, Seth, but when they had lived 130 years, whose name means replacement, replacing Abel. Notice, at this time, there are no daughters. Daughters came later. Adam and Eve lived hundreds of years and many years after Genesis 4, they had other sons and daughters. But not before Cain left the presence of the Lord and settled east of Eden.

25And Adam knew his wife again; and she bare a son, and called his name Seth: For God, said she, hath appointed me another seed instead of Abel, whom Cain slew.

26And to Seth, to him also there was born a son; and he called his name Enos: then began men to call upon the name of the LORD.

Genesis 5 1This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him;

2Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created.

3And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, and after his image; and called his name Seth:

And Seth is recorded has having a son, named Enos and not a daughter. So, where did all these women come from from which the cities were filled?

Obviously, there were "people" on the earth that were not derived from Adam and Eve. These non-Adamites are referred to as the "beasts of the field" and are the beasts with whom the fallen angels procreated with.

Denying this is like having your house destroyed by a tornado and standing in the rubble, you say there was no storm.

There are non-white races on the planet that were not the result of Yahweh's doing. They are the results of a corruption of His Creation. Fallen angels procreating with those creatures resulted in what we have today as the non-white, non-Adamic races.

It is these races that the jews are pushing the whites to intermingle and interbred with, that is, race mix, which is fornication. Jude 7, 11, Galatians 5:19, Ephesians 5:3, 1 Thess. 4:3 and others. This race mixing - brought to its ultimate end, will destroy the white race.

This destruction of the white race is what is what the jews are pushing for when they promote multi-culturalism for the white race.


Another Race Mixing Commercial

Results of Race Mixing and Immigration

Read More...

Yahshua is Yahweh Come in the Flesh

There are those who don't accept the fact that Yahshua is Yahweh come in the flesh. They don't understand that Yahweh was married to Israel, but, due to her unfaithfulness, divorced her. Jeremiah 3:8 And, in order to marry her again, had to die.

Because of His own law, He had to die so that He could remarry her. "Israel, once divorced by Old Testament law, could not be remarried to Yahweh, except by one provision, and that being that either Israel or Yahweh must die. That was the entire purpose of the crucifixion, for upon Yahshua dying, the way was clear for Him (Yahweh in the flesh as Yahshua) to once again marry Israel as he had done before. "  Deuteronomy 24:4: "Her former husband, which sent her away, may not take her again to be his wife, after that she is defiled; for that is an abomination before Yahweh."

See Clifton Emahiser's What Scripture Teaches About the Unclean.

It was Yahweh who married Israel, not Yashua. It is Yahshua that will marry the bride - Israel.

If Yahshua is not Yahweh come in the flesh, then the Son is to marry His Father's wife. This would be a violation of Yahweh's own Law, as found in Luke 16:18: "Whosoever putteth away his wife, and marries another, committeth adultery: and whosoever marrieth her that is put away from her husband committeth adultery."


Further, it is universalists who insist that the "Bride of Christ" includes "everyone who believes in Jesus," that is, "Gentiles" or anyone of any race. If this were true, then Yahshua would be a race mixer, and race mixing is  condemned throughout Scripture, including the New Testament. Race mixing is referred to as "fornication."  Jude 7, 11, Galatians 5:19, Ephesians 5:3, 1 Thess. 4:3 and others.

Yahshua is Yahweh. Yahshua is to marry His kinsmen, whom He clearly stated He, as the Kinsman Redeemer, came to redeem and take them back as His wife.

It is those whose "knowledge" of Scripture is a mile wide and an inch deep who insist that Yahshua is not Yahweh of the Old Testament.

".. he that has seen me has seen the Father." "I and the Father are One."

Scripture clearly states that Yahshua is "God with us."

Mat 1:23      23Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us.

John8: 58Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.

Which is clearly a reference to Exodus 3:6,13,14:

6Moreover he said, I am the God of thy father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob.

 13And Moses said unto God, Behold, when I come unto the children of Israel, and shall say unto them, The God of your fathers hath sent me unto you; and they shall say to me, What is his name? what shall I say unto them?

 14And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you. 

Notice also here that Yahweh does not say He is the God of any other people except, "the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob." No where in Scripture does Yahweh claim to be the God of any other people.

There is no epistle to the Chinese, the Mexicans, the Koreans, or the Amerindians. There are epistles to the Corinthians, the Galatians, the Romans, all the "twelve tribes which are scattered abroad."

The bible was written by Israelites, for Israelites, about Israelites and to Israelites, and no other peoples.

Read More...

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Sticking Together is Acceptable for Everyone - Except Whites

__________________

Ethnic pandering, race identifying, and racist political ads: can you even imagine a white politician in Iowa, or say Montana, identifying with his white constituency like this Asian jew with a Korean wife does here?

Any white politician who would even dare to defend, support or advocate his race "Stick Together," would be mercilessly and immediately hounded out of office by the jewish ADL or Southern Poverty Law Center, and his career ruined. But this jew and non-white minorities get a pass.

Think - you whites. Our race - the white race - is under attack

______



______

Read More...

Sunday, May 15, 2011

Forensic Evidence of the Alleged Holocaust Few Can Examine

_____________________


_________________

Go right ahead, deny the reality and continue to promote one of the greatest lies and frauds in history. Second perhaps only to the Federal Reserve System, served up by and benefiting the very same group of criminals.

___

Read More...

Saturday, May 14, 2011

Scofield's False Teaching in Matthew 25


False teachings, deliberate mis-leadings and other guile are found throughout the Scofield Reference Bible. For a backdrop to this missive, other Kerux Replies has gone into more detail as to the background of Cyrus I. Scofield and his Zionist reference bible, see here and here.

One such deceptive lie is found in the footnote for Matthew 25. It reads, inter alia:

"2(25:32) This judgment of individual Gentiles is to be distinguished from other judgments in Scripture, such as ....." (page 1036 1967 edition)

First off, the word gentile was not even used by any writers of the Old or New Testament. The Greek word here (that Scofield says means "Gentiles" and is often translated "Gentile" by the KJ translators) is Strong's # 1484 ethnos - meaning a race, a people, nation; the nations. The word ethnos does not mean "gentile." Clifton Emahiser explains the misapplication of the word gentile in the Bible here. See also Bertrand Comparet's Who Are the Gentiles?

The factual short version is this:

"No Bible writer ever used the term (gentile) as there is no such word in Hebrew, Aramaic or Greek. The first time that the Latin word “gentile” ever appeared in any Bible is when Jerome translated the original manuscripts from Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek into Latin! Secondly, and more importantly, in Jerome’s day, the Latin term “gentile” (gentilis) never had today’s corrupted definition meaning “non-Jew”. The Junior Classic Latin Dictionary published by Wilcox & Follett Company in 1945 defines gentilis: “of the same clan or race”, surely a word consistent with all of Scripture (Amos 3:2, Matt. 15:24 etc.)." Emahiser

Second, the verse is not discussing individuals - singular - at all. Ethnos is races or nations, not individual "Gentiles." The subject here is nations, not individuals.

This pretzel theology is typical of the type of deception Scofield and his editors used: they twist scripture to fit their Zionist view. Unsuspecting judeo-christians, who only surface study scripture, if at all, don't realize they are being subtly deceived and manipulated by the numerous commentaries, footnotes and "helps" found throughout this widely used reference bible.

Mattew 25:31-46 reads:

31When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory:
32And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats:
33And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left.
34Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world:
35For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in:
36Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me.
37Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink?
38When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee?
39Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee?
40And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.
41Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:
42For I was an hungred, and ye gave me no meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me no drink:
43I was a stranger, and ye took me not in: naked, and ye clothed me not: sick, and in prison, and ye visited me not.
44Then shall they also answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, or athirst, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not minister unto thee?
45Then shall he answer them, saying, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to me.
46And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.

32And before him shall be gathered all nations:

The KJ translators had to translate ethnos in this verse as nations, as gentiles would not have made any sense. To do otherwise, like they so often did in other passages, would have been an obvious error. But that didn't stop Scofield from alleging, in his footnoted "helps" from leading the unsuspecting to believe the word ethnos means "Gentile." And that didn't stop the editors of the Scofield Reference bible from continuing the deception - they retained Scofield's footnotes in their aforementioned 1967 edition from which the above quote was taken.

What deception does Scofield, and his editors, who retained the copyright to the work that bears his name, put forth?

"The subjects of this judgment are "all nations," i.e. all Gentiles (Gr. ethne) then living on earth. Three classes of individuals are mentioned: (1) sheep, saved Gentiles, (2) goats, unsaved Gentiles, and (3) brethren, the people of Israel."

No where in Scripture are sheep referred to as "saved Gentiles." In fact, Scripture plainly states that the 12 Tribes of Israel are His sheep. See Psalm 95:7, 100:3; and

"Israel is a scattered sheep." Jeremiah 50:7;

"My sheep (Israel) wandered through all the mountains, and upon every high hill: yea, my flock was scattered upon all the face of the earth, and none did search or seek after them." Ezekiel 34:6;

"I will surely assemble, O Jacob, (Israel) all of thee; I will surely gather the remnant of Israel; I will put them together as the sheep of Bozrah, as the flock in the midst of their fold: they shall make great noise by reason of the multitude of men." Micah 2:12;

It was for these sheep, referred to in the Old Testament that Yahshua came to redeem and it was to these sheep that he sent His disciples: "But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel." Matthew 10:6.

A careful reading of the Matthew 25 passage will plainly show the objective reader that it will be the different races, or nations, that will be gathered together; "when the Son of man shall come in all his glory. He shall "separate them one (race) from another (race), as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats. He shall set the sheep on his right hand and the goats on the left."

Notice the passage does not say "believers and unbelievers." Don't allow cognitive dissonance to block from your mind what Scripture states here clear and concisely: When the Son of man returns he will judge the races or nations: not unbelievers who might have been saved, not unsaved "Gentiles" who could have been saved from everlasting punishment had they only "given their heart to Jesus," as Scofield and his editors would have you believe.

Scripture was written by Israelites, for Israelites, about Israelites and to Israelites, and no one else. Judeo-christians, like Scofield, the editoral committee of Oxford University Press and the rabid Zionist John Hagee, want others to believe that it is the Edomite jews who are Yahweh's Chosen and that redemption is for everyone. Redemption is clearly for the lost sheep of the house of Israel only.

Yahshua clearly and unequivocally stated to the Canaanite women, in the very same gospel of Matthew, only ten chapters earlier, that "I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel." 15:24

It is those same lost sheep who are referred to in Matthew 25. Goats don't turn into sheep.

The other non-white, non-Adamic, non-Israelite mixed raced nations are not going to be converted, despite how many well meaning but otherwise foolish and purposely deceived missionaries waste their time, effort and their supporter's hard earned money trying to do the impossible: goats do not become sheep, tares do not become wheat and bad fish do not become good fish (Matthew 13:48).

"but cast the bad away. 49 So shall it be at the end of the world: the angels shall come forth, and sever the wicked from among the just, 50. And shall cast them into the furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth. "

Did you see that? "The wicked are among the just." Just like the tares are among the wheat and the bad fish are among the good fish. But in the end, they will be separated.

There will be wailing and gnashing of teeth because so many universalists believe that anyone and everyone can be a sheep, wheat and good fish.

Matthew 25: 46And these (goats, tares and bad fish) shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous (Israelites) into life eternal.








Read More...

Tuesday, May 03, 2011

David Duke: The Insanity of Christian Zionism

_______________

No comment necessary. Duke says it all.

____


___

Read More...

Saturday, April 23, 2011

Jews Mock Crucifixion of Yahshua

_________________________________

If this video was mocking the so-called jews - YouTube would pull this video in a heartbeat.

Jewish hypocrisy knows no limits.

___________________



___

Read More...