Obsessed With Money

In my view, Americans are obsessed with making money, and more of it. For so many Americans, if you or that important issue they should be concerned about but are not, (see below) can not in some way further their goal of making money, they want nothing to do with you or that concern. They move on to the next "number." "It's all in the numbers," ya know.

We've all heard the saying, "The love of money is the root of all evil," sometimes misquoted as "money is the root of all evil." Money itself is not the problem; the love of money is the evil that brings on the problems.

While money obsessed Americans do deals on the deck, the USS Caucasian is sinking into a cesspool of Marxist Culturalism, Jewish-Marxist communism, (Obama is a Marxist communist) materialism / consumerism, spending but not producing because our manufacturing was shipped over to communist China, with Chosenite Kissinger clearing the path with his secret meeting with judeo-communist Zhou Enlai back in 1971.  Meanwhile conscripted White American young men were supposedly fighting the communist Domino Theory  (note who this talking point is attributed to and see below) in Southeast Asia. Not a treasonous act at all, as it was Kissinger who reported said, most likely also speaking for his Chosen Ones warmonger friends: "American military men are dumb stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy."


Don't you see the irony in a communist Chosen One, Kissinger, secretly meeting with a judeo-communist leader in judeo-communist China, while with the other face, saying fighting judeo-communism is worth the lives of conscripted White Caucasian non-Chosen Ones, whom the U.S. Secretary of State refers to as dumb-stupid-animal-pawns?

You get that all you veterans? Those who send you to war to be maimed and killed, and leave your children fatherless and your wife a widow, think you're dumb and stupid for going.  Reality is, you don't and didn't fight for our freedoms. Wrap your head around that fact and then ask yourself if you're "really ready to fight for our freedoms? There are so many domestic enemies to fight, and so few fighting for their People.

Judeo-Christian-Zionists clamor for wars and more wars for "our only Democratic ally in the Middle East" which funnels more billions to the Chosenites controlled weapons manufacturers. "Israel has the right to defend itself." Those billions buy more prostitute senators and congressman, and the cycle of war and profit continues.  Mention Smedley Butler's War is a Racket, and you'd get more of a reaction out of your listener had you brought up last night's Game.

What passes for entertainment, controlled by God's Chosen in Hollywood, can not retain the attention of intelligent people, but at the same time does a fantastic job of keeping the "fiction is reality"  masses occupied with banal trivia, sexual perversion, destructive programming, violence, lust, lies, pompous ass talking heads telling those who disagree with him to "Shut up!" helping the sheeple ignore the severe listing of the ship port side.

The Captains of the country have managed the perceptions of White Americans so successfully, that those who dare point out the enemy attacker who torpedoed the USS Caucasian and continues to fire upon it, are automatically labeled "racists," "extremists," "haters," antisemites, cult members, blasphemers, domestic terrorists, and the worst of all, Nazis, by those who have "learned" what ever history they think they know from sources provided to them by their enemy, The Chosenites. 

Oh, you ask, how has the media managed our perceptions? Take a look at the Wikipedia Eisenhower page for just one example among thousands that could be provided: there is not a single mention of Operation Keelhaul or the open air prison camps in Germany after the war, within which a reported 1.2 million German soldiers died. Both war crimes of historical proportions, and both, unlike the holocaust hoax, easily verified. And yes, Eisenhower was one of the Chosen Ones.

For those interested in learning some reality history regarding Germany in WWII, I suggest Thomas Goodrich Hellstorm: The Death Of Nazi Germany, 1944-1947 (first edition)

If our enemy has its way, like it did in Jewish Bolshevik and Stalin's Russia, Eisenhower's post WWII Germany, Lazar Kaganavich's Ukraine Holodomor, on the Attack on the Liberty money will soon become a secondary concerned to those who are now driven by little else.

Reality history, not the propaganda on the History Channel, teaches us that survival will become the primary concern.

At that time, my guess is the issues they should have been concerned with but weren't will soon become a priority also. Well, you've heard that other well known saying, haven't you?

"Better late than never." Do you think that idea stands up in this scenario?

For so many, money brings security. We all put away money for "social security" don't we? I've been rich, and I've been broke and yes, I agree rich is better than broke in many ways.

However, I'd rather be broke and free, than rich and a slave.

Let's end with Benjamin Franklin:  “Those who give up liberty for security deserve neither.”

Read More...

Summary only...

Reply to "The Errors of Christian Identity Doctrine"

Following is one reply to this article:

The Errors of Christian Identity Doctrine

After briefing scanning the article, one of the first major errors easily exposed in the writing is the author's error in not including the English word "nations" as a possible translation for the original Greek's ethnos:

Ethnos

"What must be understood first is the importance that Christian Identity places upon the word 'ethnos' to support their system. It is taught that ethnos, although most often translated 'heathen,' 'Gentiles,' or 'people,' is referring specifically to the 'sent out and scattered' House of Israel, otherwise known as the diasporia of the 'Ten Lost Tribes.'"

The author lists the three English words ethnos is "most often translated" as "heathen, Gentiles, or "people."

But wait, I checked Strongs Concordance and I found this:

The KJV translates Strongs G1484 (ethnos) in the following manner: Gentiles (93x), nation (64x), heathen (5x), people (2x).

Oops! the author must not have read Strongs or simply missed the fact that the word ethnos is translated 64x as "nation."

The author's preferred translation, heathen, is, according to Strong's, only translated five times for ethnos. That's only 7.8 % that of nation. And, it could be demonstrated that Gentiles, translated 93 times for ethnos, should never be translated Gentiles, allowing for the very real possibility that the vast majority of the time ethnos is used in the Greek, it should be translated nations, completely destroying the authors position that only three words "heathen, Gentile or people," are usually used to translate the Greek word ethnos. 
 
Galatians 1:16 could have been translated "That I (Paul) might announce Him among the nations." This quite acceptable translation goes against the statement made by the author: "Galatians 1:16, where Paul declares that he was called to preach to the heathen, which word does not in any way imply, or distinguish, a diasporia.(sic)"

Oh, yes indeed ethnos, translated as nation, and not as heathen, in verse 16 does imply and distinguish Paul's fellow Israelites scattered throughout Galatia.

Why does the author leave out "nations" as a possible correct translation for the word ethnos in Galatians 1:16?

There are only two possible answers:

1) He simply didn't know that "nations" was translated 64 times in the KJV and was clearly a possible English option for ethnos, and therefore didn't include it in his writing, or

2) He knew the word ethnos could also be translated "nations" and thus provide evidence contrary to his argument that "which word (ethnos) does not in any way imply, or distinguish, a diasporia.(sic)".

If #1 is the case, the author is a poor researcher. This lack of research skills puts him suspect for the rest of his writings.

If #2 is the case, the author is purposely attempting to mislead.

Once one actually does his own research, which in this case research discovered the author, for whatever his reasons, left out the word "nations" from a part of the discussion where the proper translation would have direct bearing on the meaning of the passage, which meaning would contradict the agenda of the author attempting to show others "The Errors of Christian Identity Doctrine."

The author quite likely estimates that very few will study what he wrote (I Thes 5:21), fewer less who will apply critical thinking and then compare those thoughts with the thoughts of those he respects for their objective scholarship and intellectual honesty, and can thus get by with this pretzel theology.

There is an apt Scriptural truth that applies here. I'm sure most of you reading this know what it is.

Further, if we determine the meaning of the Greek word ethnos, which is, according to Strong's:

1. a multitude (whether of men or of beasts) associated or living together
   1. a company, troop, swarm
2. a multitude of individuals of the same nature or genus
   1. the human family
3. a tribe, nation, people group
   
   We can safely come to the conclusion, as most Christian Racial Identists do, that Paul was announcing to his kinsmen in Galatia, kinsman who composed the same tribe, or nation, or people group as himself, who said plainly (Philippians 3:5) he was of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, that Yahshua the Christ was their Kinsman Redeemer.  

Read More...

Summary only...

His Workmanship

Awesome thought to consider: "We are his workmanship,  a work, created......" Ephesians 2:10

Ever come up with an idea in your mind, then bring those intangible thoughts into tangible existence by utilizing existing materials to build and develop that idea?

Imagine a Creator who can think of ideas, such as creating a human being - and possessing the power to  create that individual out of materials that He has to create into existence - and then infuse that person, that unique individual with DNA like no other that as ever lived or will live, with a living soul and spirit that can communicate with its Creator - and one barely begins to understand how beyond comprehension our Creator  is.

And we are His workmanship - that which has been made - that which has been created - in Christ Jesus -  the Thought / Expression or Word of God.

Ever think about what words are? Words communicate thoughts. We use words to express our thoughts. Want to know what God is thinking? Consider the Living Word of God, Jesus Christ - He is the expression of his Father - "If you have seen me, you have seen the Father.  No man hath seen God at any time, the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath manifested him."

Consider also Scripture, which in the original Hebrew and Greek is inspired by God and is living and active, a critic of the thoughts and intents of our hearts while we read and study His Word. While we read the Word, the Word is reading us. I find myself much more careful of the thoughts and intentions I may have when I read Scripture when I remember it is also reading me. 

As His workmanship, He simply wants us to trust Him - that He will keep his many promises to take care of us - and not allow us to go through anything we can't handle together - as we do those good works ordained, prepared for us, before the foundation of the world, that we should walk in them.

We are His workmanship. We are that which has been made in His image.

Read More...

Summary only...

Vikings Were the Tribe of Dan

You've no doubt come across the fool who only is interested in giving their opinion? Those who are not interested in understanding what you have to contribute to the conversation, especially evidence or facts that contradict their current views? These fools are aka "know-it-alls."

I was musing on Proverbs 18:2 lately which I believe describes this person perfectly: "A fool hath no delight in understanding, but that his heart may discover itself." In the NIV - "Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions."

I've observed the Odinist Viking/Norse pagans often fall into this category. I could not understand why any modern day White person would want to be a pagan Odinist until a friend of mine told me there is a jew program on Talmudvision called The Vikings. That explains everything: these dumb White people have been programmed by the jew.

On Talmudvision, the pagan Vikings are shown as strong, courageous, tough bad-ass mofos, while Christians are shown as weaklings, turn-the-othercheek wussies who follow a mythical jew god and believe a book filled with myths and lies. No matter how much fact or reality one points out, these Viking/Odinist/Norse pagan worshipers are not interested in understanding where they may be wrong, but are experts in Cut & Paste discussion, which they believe passes for debate.

The fact is, the Vikings were from the Tribe of Dan. Everywhere the Danites went, they named places, (place-names) rivers,  way marks, etc, after their tribal leader, Dan. Hence we have ".... the Udon, the Don, the Dnieper, the Dniester, the Danube, Macedonia, Sardinia, the Eridanus (the Po), the Anodanus (the Rhone), the Codanus Sea (the Baltic), Danzig, Scandinavia, Sweden, and Danmark, to say nothing of countless others in the British Isles. 

Norsemen were a branch of the Danes. They migrated north from Danmark into Norway and Sweden. They later became known as Normans. 

No need to go further here into the background and history of the Tribe of Dan and their kinsmen Benjamites, who are believed to have settled Iceland and Greenland. There are other sites and articles such as The Danes, Normans, and "French" Canadians, Your Heritage, by Bertrand Comparet,
that go into much detail regarding the Tribe of Dan and their migrations into Europe. You might also find these maps and supporting text interesting and germane to the topic, I do. Lost Tribes of Israel Study Maps, by (appropriately enough) Daniel Walsh.  

Don't be taken in by jew propaganda regarding the true Israelites. The jews are not the Israelites of the Old Testament. The White race is, the Caucasians who settled Western and Northern Europe and then further migrated to Iceland, Greenland, North America, Australia, South Africa, Canada and built Western Civilization and what is known today as the Developed Nations, as contrasted to the undeveloped or non-White, non-Israeltes nations. 

Don't be the fool as described in Proverbs 18:2: instead, seek to understand first and not just a giver of your opinion. Nobody cares about your opinion. 

Read More...

Summary only...

Can Adamic Man Know God?

Many believe, especially "non-religious" White nationalists, that all religious beliefs are based on faith, not hard, provable, objective data. Many also believe mankind is incapable of conceptualizing the true nature of God.

I would suggest both of these beliefs are false.

Scripture, archaeology and history is full of "hard, probable objective data." The God of Scripture, Yahweh, moved entire nations to work his will - His Story - in the world throughout time. Scripture foretold (prophesied) this history and Yahweh, through His People and through other nations / peoples, brought about his will. All one needs is an understanding of Scripture, history and archaeology to see how Yahweh has brought what his prophets have accurately foretold throughout history.

Most people have little or no knowledge of Scripture, history or archaeology and thus do not realize that faith is based upon fact.

Yahweh has made every effort to enable Adamic man, created in His image, to conceptualize their God. "In the beginning was the Word (or Logos). And the Logos was with God, and the Logos was God. .... And the Word / Logos was made flesh, and dwelt among us and we beheld his glory, as of the most beloved of the Father, full of grace and truth. No man has seen Yahweh at any time; the most beloved Son, he has declared him." verses John 1:1,14,18.

Words express thoughts. Mankind communicates through language, words. We, Adamic man - (there are no other "men," made in the image of God) can know God's thoughts because we are created in His image, in his likeness. God has communicated, has expressed himself, who he is, not only through his written Word, but through his beloved son, the living Word, who has declared God, made the Creator known.


Adamic White man (endowed with God's spirit) can conceptualize the true nature of God, by examining the life of Yahshua Christ, the Kinsman Redeemer who paid the penalty for His People's transgression of His Law to bring His People back to himself. Yahweh's spirit communicates with our spirit that we are children of God. John 4:24; I John 2:27.

Adamic man can also get an understanding of the nature of Yahweh through His creation: Romans 1:19: Because what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. 20 For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse."

However, many suppress this truth of Yahweh's nature, his eternal power, his divine nature, in an unrighteous manner and then say that God cannot be known by man. 

Don't let anyone fool you into thinking that the God of Scripture cannot be known to you. Look at nature, look at the creation surrounding you to understand just a small part of Yahweh's limitless power and divine nature.

Examine the life and teachings of Yahweh himself as Yahshua the living Word, found within the written Word of God to get an idea of his grace and truth, how much he loves and cares for you, His People.


Praise Yahweh! 

Read More...

Summary only...

New Testament Only Christians

To all you New Testament only Christians: if the Old Testament is no longer relevant, why is Abraham - with whom Yahweh made an everlasting unconditional covenant with (aka the Abrahamic Covenant) - mentioned 69 times in the New Testament? 

These so-called Christian bozos ignore the fact that there was no New Testament Scriptures in the early church period. The earliest Christians ONLY had the Old Testament. Paul the apostle quotes from the OT dozens of times in the New Testament. How does a New Testament Christian understand Paul's teaching if they don't believe the Old Testament is relative today? 

Further, what about the fulfillment of OT prophecy in the New Testament period?  Simply search the word fulfilled, referring to prophecy from the OT testament fulfilled in the NT period and later and you will find the word occurs 57 times in the New Testament. One such occurrence is Luke 4:21 "And he began to say unto them, This day is this scripture fulfilled in your ears," referring to Isaiah 61:2. Notice he leaves out "day of venegance," which will be fulfilled soon.

Additionally, there is the passage "All scripture is inspired by Yahweh and is profitable for doctrine, for conviction for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of Yahweh may be complete, thoroughly furnished unto all good works. 2 Tim. 3:16,17.   When Paul wrote that admonishment to Timothy, they only had the Old Testament. How could Timothy comply if he was to ignore the OT? How can one be thoroughly furnished unto all good works if one omits the doctrines found within the OT?

My guess is that many of these so-called Christians who only follow the NT believe the OT applies to the jews. While I have news for them: the OT applies to the Israelites, not the jews, as the jews are not the Israelites of the OT. If they actually read and studied their bibles closely they just might learn that important fact.  

Many more Christians believe that Yahweh did away with the Old Testament law. The reality is that the rituals involved in the sacrifices were what was done away with, not the entire law. Yahshua himself said: ¹⁷ “Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish but to fulfill. ¹⁸ For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke shall pass from the Law until all is accomplished. ¹⁹ Whoever then annuls one of the least of these commandments, and teaches others to do the same, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever keeps and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. Matthew 5:17-19. 

The law was given ONLY to the Israelites and the 12 Tribes of the nation of Israel are the Caucasians - the Anglo-Saxon-Scandinavian-Celtic-Germanic and kindred peoples of the world. And it is only the Israelites who should be obeying them.Most of those laws are found within the Old Testament: laws regarding marriage, dietary laws, economic laws, legal principles, etc.

The law - minus the rituals - found in the Old Testament are indeed appropriate and applicable to all Israelites today. Any one who annuls one of the least of these commandments and teachers others to do the same, shall be the least in the kingdom of heaven. There are going to be quite a few called the least in the kingdom of heaven. Don't you be one of them.

Read More...

Summary only...

Cain Was Not a Son of Adam

 Here's the evidence found in Scripture that Cain was not the son of Adam.

Jude 14 And Enoch, seventh from Adam, prophesied to these saying “Behold, the Prince has come with ten thousands of His saints 15 to execute judgment against all and to convict every soul for all of their impious deeds which they committed impiously and for all of the harsh things which the impious wrongdoers have spoken against Him!”

Jude seems to be referring to Enoch 1:9, which says in the Charles edition: “9. And behold! He cometh with ten thousands of His holy ones, to execute judgement upon all, and to destroy all the ungodly: and to convict all flesh of all the works of their ungodliness which they have ungodly committed, and of all the hard things which ungodly sinners have spoken against Him.”

Note that Jude calls Enoch “seventh from Adam”. In Charles' 1 Enoch, at chapter 60 verse 8 Enoch is also called the “seventh from Adam”. Adam himself does not count here, Enoch being seventh from Adam. Therefore, either Cain or Abel – but not both, must be included in this reckoning in order to arrive at 7 first-born males. There is no other way to reckon Enoch as “seventh from Adam” within the confines of Scripture. What can this refer to, except first-born males?

Seth, replacing the murdered Abel, therefore inherits the rights of the first-born from him. So we have: 1-Abel 2-Seth 3-Enos 4-Cainan 5-Mahalaleel 6-Jared 7-Enoch, and this also demonstrates the exclusion of Cain from his birth.

Thanks to Don Brown for writing this up - saved me the time. 

Read More...

Summary only...

The Evil of Those Soon to be Stubble

The evil of those soon to be stubble (Obadiah 18) is so far beyond the ability of most naive, gullible, so easily duped Whites to comprehend, they have the illusion of "that can't happen here" while suffering from a little discussed type of bias, normalcy bias. The deception has been so far reaching, it boggles the White mind. Whites have the problem of projecting how they are unto others who are in no way like them, and do not follow the same law we have written in our hearts.

That is why the Big Lie works: Whites simply can not believe others can and would lie so easily and on such a grand scale: eg., the holocaust. The first lie was "ye shall not surely die, for Yahweh does know, that in the day you eat thereof, then your eyes will be opened and you shall be as Yahweh, knowing good and evil." It all started at the "Tree of the Knowledge of Good AND Evil." Our race knew not evil until Nachash (the Enchanter, Magician) seduced Eve and produced Cain. Evil destroys all it touches, hence Cain, who according to Josephus was a hybridizing farmer who "forced the ground," (prelude to Monsanto) slew his brother, Abel.

This Stubble have been murderers since the beginning, and yet most Whites believe this same stubble, who would murder them in a heartbeat once given the chance, are Yahweh's Chosen. How big of a deception is that?

Read More...

Summary only...

And the tree of knowledge of good and evil

"And the tree of knowledge of good and evil." Genesis 2:9. As mentioned in other missives, Nachash, the enchanter / magician, seduced Eve to commit adultery, and that union resulted in Cain. Apparently Eve was a virgin when this "eating of the apple" occurred. When you mix good with evil, you always get evil. We've been offered the lesser of two evils for decades now. 

to be added to as time allows. 

Kerux 

First edit: 

The tree of good and evil is, according to George Lamsa, a Hebrew idiom, with a metaphorical meaning of - sexual relationship. 

Read More...

Summary only...

Scofield Reference Bible Deception

A major deception promoted by the judeo-christian zionists like Hagee is found in the Scofield Reference Bible in the notes for Genesis 12:2: 

12 Now the Lord had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father's house, unto a land that I will shew thee:

² And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing:
³ And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.

"It has invariably fared ill with the people who have persecuted the Jew - well with those who have protected him. For a nation to commit the sin of anti-Semitism brings inevitable judgment." 
C. I. Scofield, notes, page 19, 1967 Edition Oxford University Press.

First off, this verse is in reference to Abram, who was not a jew. 

Second, since when is anti-Semitism a sin? No where in Scripture is this "sin" found. 

Third, since when can a nation - collectively - commit anti-Semitism? 

Fourth, jews don't descend from Shem, but from Cain/Esau, and therefore cannot be Semites. So,  how can "persecuting" the jew be anti-Semitism?

Fifth, who brings this alleged judgment upon those who "persecute" the jew? Certainly not the God of Scripture, as He says He hates Esau (Malachi 1:2), refers to the jews as being "of their father the devil" (through Cain/Esau, not Jacob/Israel - John 8:44), calls the jews the antichrists, (I John 2:18) and of the assembly of satan (the adversary) (Revelation 2:9, 3:9).

Lastly, if it has fared well with those who have protected the jew, why is the United States now in rapid decline as a nation, over $18 trillions in debt ($220 trillion if all liabilities are included)  and is being invaded with non-Whites (since the jew - Celler and Javits - promoted 1965 Immigration Act) who are turning the once great White nation into a third world cesspool? 

How well do YOU feel because your nation has "protected the jew?"

And pray tell us, how have "all the families of the earth been blessed" by the jew? The European nations, deep in debt due to Jewish control of the European Union, the Euro currency, the IMF, are collapsing - starting with Greece, to be followed soon by Spain, and Portugal with more to follow until the entire house of Jewish usury based fiat currency fails.

The one nation that told the Jews to take their banking system and stick it, Iceland, is doing just fine isn't it? So much for those who curse the jews will be cursed. The reality is the exact opposite.

Read More...

Summary only...