I Thessalonians 5:20, 21

Do not despise expounding of scripture, but scrutinize all things. Hold fast that which is right.

Malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium

- I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery.


See also Kerux Replies at Wordpress.com where all future missives will also be posted.

However, because Wordpress charges an outrageous $59.95 a year for a video upload upgrade, videos will only be linked, not embedded.

Sunday, April 13, 2008

The Jewish Role in China's Opium Wars

The Hong Kong Museum of History, located on 100 Chatham Road South in Tsim Sha Sui, Kowloon, is divided into four main areas of interest: natural history, archaeology, ethnography and local history. According to the museum’s website, Hong Kong Museum of History, the local history gallery “outlines the Opium Wars, their causes, the way in which the wars unfolded and the consequences.”

One vital fact is not mentioned in the Hong Kong’s museum’s historical gallery. Although the gallery’s descriptive texts do mention the fact that opium was introduced by the British merchants, it doesn’t mention who those British merchants were. The British government had granted "monopoly rights" to the manufacture of cotton goods, silk and most importantly, opium -- at that time the most addictive drug in the world - to one British merchant. That one British merchant was David Sassoon.

David Sassoon – “the Rothschild of the East” – the son of Saleh Sassoon of Baghdad, Iraq, “was a Bombay businessman who owned a counting house, a small carpet godown and an opium business.” David Sassoon

“The Jewish Encyclopedia of 1905, states that Sassoon expanded his opium trade into China and Japan. He placed his eight sons in charge of the major opium exchanges in China. According to the 1944 Jewish Encyclopedia: "He employed only Jews in his business, and wherever he sent them he built synagogues and schools for them. He imported whole families of fellow Jews . . . and put them to work." Sassoon's sons were busy pushing this mind-destroying drug in Canton, China. Between 1830 and 1831 they trafficked 18,956 chests of opium, earning millions of dollars. Part of the profits went to Queen Victoria and the British government. In the year 1836 the trade increased to over 30,000 chests and drug addiction became endemic in coastal cities.” Hong Kong, Land Built on Opium

The gallery tells the story of how British merchants were buying Chinese goods – tea, silk, spices, salt, a ‘magical’ cloth - asbestos, gunpowder, ceramics and iron products, in exchange for silver and gold, especially silver. The gallery tells how the British merchants wanted the Chinese to buy goods from the British, but only got the reply that the British had nothing the Chinese wanted. This one-sided trade caused a deficit of payments for the British traders, a deficit they didn’t like, as they were spending silver and gold species in exchange for the Chinese silk, tea and manufactured goods but no hard currency was returning to Britain. The British demand for Chinese products was so great and, because of the demand that they be paid in real species - the silver being mined in the 1800s in South America – e.g. Peru, was dropped shipped directly to China from the South American ports. The trade imbalance was so great, that it resulted in the Chinese accumulating half the world’s reserves of silver. This imbalance disturbed the British merchants.

In 1839, the Manchu Emperor demanded a stop to the opium smuggling into China. The Emperor appointed the Commissioner of Canton, Lin Tse-hsu, to lead a campaign against opium. Lin-Tse-hsu was a moral and incorruptible individual. He seized 2,000 chests of opium, and as depicted in the museum’s gallery, damned off part of the seashore in Hong Kong in which to destroy the prodigious amount of seized opium. This act of Lin Tse-hsu outraged Sassoon and when his demands went unmet, easily defeated the Chinese army who, after over 10 years of opium addiction, had been devastated and proved no match for the superior equipped and trained British forces, who acted as mercenaries for the Sassoons. The first Opium War ended in 1842 and culminated in the “Treaty of Nanking.” The so-called ‘peace treaty’ included three important provisions, all highly favorable to Sassoon:

1. Full legalization of the opium trade in China
2. Compensation from the opium stockpiles confiscated by Lin of two million pounds
3. Territorial sovereignty for the British Crown over several designated offshore islands.

The Treaty of Nanking gave Sassoon monopoly rights to push opium in port cities of China. Not satisfied with just addicting the Chinese in the coastal areas, he demanded the right to sell his drug to the millions of Chinese throughout mainland China. British Prime Minister Palmerston declared that all of interior China must be open for uninterrupted opium traffic. When the Chinese resisted, Sassoon’s British mercenaries started the Second Opium War of 1858 – 1860. In October, the British besieged Peking. When the city fell, British commander Lord Elgin, ordered the temples in the city sacked and burned to the ground as a show of contempt. In the new "Peace Treaty" of Oct.25, 1860, the British were assigned rights to a vastly expanded opium trade covering seven-eights of China, which brought in over 20 million pounds in 1864 alone. In that year, the Sassoons imported 58,681 chests of opium and by 1880 it skyrocketed to 105,508 chests, making the Sassoons the richest Jews in the world. England was given the Hong Kong peninsula as a colony and large sections of Amoy, Canton, Foochow, Ningpo and Shanghai. The Sassoons were now licensing opium dens in each British occupied area with large fees being collected by their Jewish agents. Sassoon would not allow any other race to engage in "the Jews' business."

However, the British government would not allow any opium to be imported into Europe! Hong Kong - Land Built on Opium

Today, another war promoted by International Jewry is being waged in Afghanistan, the world's top supplier of opium. Once again we see how Jews use the goyim - in this instance young American men and unfortunately women - to fight their wars for profit in yet another attempt to satisfy their insatiable lust for money and power no matter what the cost to human lives and other peoples' resources.


Friday, April 11, 2008

What Are Darwinists Afraid Of?

For starters, the truth. Those in control of the mainstream media, [MSM] that is, Jewish interests, have been able to stifle any and all discussion even remotely critical of Darwinian evolution for years. Never is a respected creationist or intelligent design [ID] advocate given a platform in the Jewish controlled MSM to even present the case for either view opposed to evolution. Creationists and ID advocates, whenever they are mentioned in the MSM, are instead ridiculed, marginalized or attacked vehemently. Some are punished with smear campaigns, as in the case of Dr. Stephen Meyers and Dr. Richard Steinberg, mentioned by Ben Stein in the trailer of his upcoming film, Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed.

In addition to the assaults by the MSM, through the American Civil Liberties Union - an organization top heavy with Jewish attorneys and Jewish activists - anything remotely pro-Christian, including scientific creationism or ID, is attacked with the express purpose of having that particular view expunged from the public arena, be it in a public school science textbook, classroom or curriculum. Any teacher or school board that allows or advocates the teaching of creationism or ID along side the teaching of evolution is threatened with legal action unless they withdrew their plan of allowing both Biblical creation or ID to be taught. In no way will the ACLU allow students to be exposed to opposing viewpoints to evolutionary Darwinism. In no way will the ACLU allow public school students to examine all the evidence and make up their own minds as to the merits of each. No, the ACLU has made sure, around the nation, that Darwinism and only Darwinism is taught. The ACLU advocates free choice for women to abort babies, but not students to chose what to believe regarding man's origins or human design by an Intelligent Designer. It's evolution or nothing. So much for 'tolerance.' As the anti-Creationists and anti-Intelligent Design advocates say, 'non-scientific' propaganda has no place in the public school systems of the United States. But of course, the 'scientific' evolutionary Darwinism propaganda is allowed.

Just like with the alleged Jewish holocaust, anyone who questions or challenges evolution, is threatened with job loss, denied tenure, ostracized or labeled as conspirators attempting to subvert others with unscientific propaganda. As Ben Stein points out, free speech is tolerated in every other area of our society, but not with views opposing evolution.

Stein asks the question, "What makes this situation so different?" He observes that in his experience, "those who are confident of their ideas or thoughts, are not afraid of criticism. And that tells me [Stein] that Darwinists are afraid. They are hiding something."

What are the Darwinists hiding? I believe they are hiding, just like the Holocaust Industry is hiding the fact that their dogma, their doctrine, if investigated openly, objectively and thoroughly, will not stand up to the light of the truth.

I, for one, applaud the efforts of Ben Stein. I am glad to see a Jewish person, such as Stein, stand up to the propaganda machine that is preventing the truth from being known about many subjects that have become taboo and even dangerous to one's academic career, if questioned.

I can't wait to view Stein's movie, Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed


I also can't wait to see a similar movie in the same documentary format about the alleged Jewish holocaust. I say Jewish holocaust because there have been many holocausts down through history, but because Jewish interests control most all the outlets of mass information dissemination, we only hear of the alleged Jewish holocaust. And that is why many are attacking Ben Stein for making this documentary. "Expelled" may just be the beginning of other documentary style movies exposing the fact that we are being force fed lies and propaganda about many other topics as well.


Saturday, April 05, 2008

"Christ Sucks"

At least that is what Al Goldstein, the Jew publisher of Screw, said on lukeford.net and was quoted in the Jewish Quarterly [Winter 2004/05 issue] article "Triple-exthnics" by Nathan Abrams. Taken in context, Goldstein said, "The only [sic] reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks. We don’t believe in authoritarianism."

Let's get this straight. Jews are not "in pornography' because they are greedy, depraved, lustful and licentious. The only reason Jews are 'in pornography" is because they think "Christ sucks." In other words, Christ makes them do it. And the Jews 'in pornography' don't like the idea that Christ, man's Creator, has established moral laws for the protection of our culture. That Jews 'in pornography' don't believe they need to follow the moral codes of the dominant culture they find themselves in. Just to be sure we understand where the Jews 'in pornography' are coming from, orthodox Jew and porn gossipmonger Luke Ford explains on his website (lukeford.net): ‘Porn is just one expression of [the] rebellion against standards." And to quote Nathan Abrams,"Pornography thus becomes a way of defiling Christian culture...as it penetrates to the very heart of the American mainstream...."

I'm glad we got that straight. And I wonder what the other expressions of rebellion against standards are? But we can get into those expressions of rebellion in another missive.

In essence then, Goldstein and the other Jews, who are 'in pornography,' reject Western culture's Christian moral standards established over the last 2000 years. Not only do those Jews who are 'in pornography,' reject Christian morality, the Jews involved in pornography as a result of "hatred of Christian authority," are trying to "weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion," and pornography is a means of "defiling Christian culture," as observed by Nathan Abrams.

When I read statements written by a Jew quoting other Jews published in a salient Jewish publication intended for Jewish readership, I realize why the Jews have been expelled from dozens [at least 79 by latest count] of countries down through history. It's because they reject the standards of the non-Jewish culture around them and 'seek to weaken the dominant culture," through whatever means possible, in our case, pornography. When the dominant culture realizes what has happened to their culture,i.e., their culture has been defiled and weakened by the Jewish minority in their midst, they give Jews the boot, and rightly so. What culture can survive if it allows a minority within their culture to reject the dominant moral standards of the majority and host culture and defile, subvert and weaken the dominant culture?

Fortunately for the Jews, but unfortunately for the next dominant culture the Jews latched on to as parasites, these peoples and cultures only gave the Jews the boot and not the noose. Or the gas chambers, as the Jewish Holocaust Industry fraudulently claims.