I Thessalonians 5:20, 21

Do not despise expounding of scripture, but scrutinize all things. Hold fast that which is right.

Malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium

- I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery.


See also Kerux Replies at Wordpress.com where all future missives will also be posted.

However, because Wordpress charges an outrageous $59.95 a year for a video upload upgrade, videos will only be linked, not embedded.

Friday, December 21, 2007

Ron Paul Supporters Preventing Comments on Deceitful YouTube Videos


timbukto1 (4 days ago)

Only 15 minutes left to donate to the Ron Paul Campaign "Tea Party"! Donate now or forever hold your peace and be happy with your over-taxed, over-regulated lot in life and the status quo.

Please donate at: RonPaul2008. com
or call 1-877-Ron-Paul
thats 1-877-766-7285

View all 1 comments
Adding comments has been disabled for this video.

Here's another video with the comments section disabled.



Adding comments has been disabled for this video.

Why would Ron Paul supporters block comments of the viewers of these videos? Are they afraid the truth about Ron Paul will get out? Like Ron Paul's connection with Lewis Lehrman of PNAC fame?

And his support of a gold backed currency which will do nothing but keep control of our money supply in the same hands it was in with the Jewish controlled Federal Reserve?

Methinks so.


Megaphone Shofar - Cyber-Soldiers for Israel

The Zionists have an online army that is used to influence information concerning Israel.


International Jewry controls most if not all of mainstream media and they still aren't satisfied? They want 100% of the internet too?

[Note: On checking this link on Jan. 22, 2008, I found it removed for "terms of use violation," which is nothing more than a euphemism for "the video criticized Israel." The video's removal proves the point of this short missive - Zionists fear the truth.


Wednesday, December 19, 2007

Lincoln's Monetary Policy - 1865

Despite what the gold bugs claim - including Ron Paul and his buddy Lewis Lerhman - we don't need a gold standard. A gold standard backed monetary system would only keep control of our financial system in the hands of those who own the gold, and that isn't you or me.

By the way, is there any gold in Fort Knox? If not, where is it and who took it? And why did Britain's Gordon Brown sell off Britain's gold at $265 an ounce when it is now worth three times that? Who bought all that gold on the cheap and then rewarded Brown for his colossal mistake?

Read what Abraham Lincoln had to say about a gold back currency back in 1865. Some historians believed Lincoln was assassinated for his stand against the bankers of his day.

"Money is the creature of law, and the creation of the original issue of money should be maintained as the exclusive monopoly of national government. Money possesses no value to the state other than that given to it by circulation Capital has its proper place and is entitled to every protection. The wages of men should be recognized in the structure of and in the social order as more important than the wages of money [interest].

No duty is more imperative for the government than the duty it owes the people to furnish them with a sound and uniform currency, and of regulating the circulation of the medium of exchange so that labour will be protected from a vicious currency [private bank-created, interest-bearing debt], and commerce will be facilitated by cheap and safe exchanges.

The available supply of gold and silver being wholly inadequate to permit the issuance of coins of intrinsic value or paper currency convertible into coin in the volume required to serve the needs of the People, some other basis for the issue of currency must be developed, and some means other than that of convertibility into coin must be developed to prevent undue fluctuation in the value of paper currency or any other substitute for money of intrinsic value that may come into use.

The monetary needs of increasing numbers of people advancing towards higher standards of living can and should be met by the government. Such needs can be met by the issue of national currency and credit through the operation of a national banking system. The circulation of a medium of exchange issued and backed by the government can be properly regulated and redundancy of issue avoided by withdrawing from circulation such amounts as may be necessary by taxation, re-deposit and otherwise. Government has the power to regulate the currency and credit of the nation.

Government should stand behind its currency and credit and the bank deposits of the nation. No individual should suffer a loss of money through depreciation or inflated currency or Bank bankruptcy.

Government, possessing the power to create and issue currency and credit as money and enjoying the right to withdraw both currency and credit from circulation by taxation and otherwise, need not and should not borrow capital at interest [from the private banking system or their affiliates] as a means of financing government work and public enterprise. The government should create issue and circulate all the currency and credit needed to satisfy the spending power of the government and the buying power of consumers. The privilege of creating and issuing money is not only the supreme prerogative of government, but it is the government's greatest creative opportunity.

By the adoption of these principles, the long-felt want for a uniform medium will be satisfied. The taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest, discounts, and exchanges. The financing of all public enterprises, the maintenance of stable government and ordered progress, and the conduct of the Treasury will become matters of practical administration. The people can and will be furnished with a currency as safe as their own government. Money will cease to be the master and become the servant of humanity. Democracy will rise superior to the money power."

Abraham Lincoln, Senate document 23, Page 91. 1865.


Tuesday, December 18, 2007

Ron Paul - Not All He Appears to Be.

Thanks to Darryl Bradford Smith of http://www.iamthewitness.com/index.html for outing Ron Paul who co-authored a book about gold - The Case for Gold - with Lewis E. Lehrman, who just happens to be on the board of directors of the Project for the New American Century. You know who the PNAC is don't you? They're the neo-cons who wrote the PNAC's policy document, "Rebuilding America's Defenses," which openly advocates for total global military domination. Many PNAC members hold highest-level positions in the George W. Bush administration.

Something to me just didn't seem right about Ron Paul. Now I know why.
Funny, I went here http://rightweb.irc-online.org/ind/lehrman/lehrman.html
and none of these links worked:

(1) Project for the New American Century

(2) Gerson Lehrman Group

(3) Lewis (Lew) Lehrman: 1982 Governor Campaign Retrospective

(4) Joe Conason, “Notes on a Native Son,” Harper’s Magazine, February 2000

(5) GroupWatch: Citizens for America

6) Group Watch: Council for National Policy

Now, isn't that strange? Are we not supposed to know more about Mr. Lehrman?


Monday, December 17, 2007

Immigrants' Poem

I cross ocean,
poor and broke,
Take bus,
see employment folk.

Nice man treat me
good in there,
Say I need to
see welfare.

Welfare say,
"You come no more,
We send cash
right to your door."

Welfare checks,
they make you wealthy,
Medicaid it keep
you healthy!

By and by,
I got plenty money,
Thanks to you,
American dummy.

Write to friends
in motherland,
Tell them 'come
fast as you can.'

They come in turbans
and Ford trucks,
I buy big house
with welfare bucks

They come here,
we live together,
More welfare checks,
it gets better!

Fourteen families,
they moving in,
But neighbor's patience
wearing thin.

Finally, American
moves away,
Now I buy his house,
and then I say,

"Find more aliens
for house to rent."
And in the yard
I put a tent.

Send for family
they just trash,
But they, too,
draw the welfare cash!

Everything is
very good,
And soon we
own the neighborhood.

We have hobby
it's called breeding,
Welfare pay
for baby feeding.

Kids need dentist?
Wife need pills?
We get free!
We got no bills!

American crazy!
He pay all year,
To keep welfare
running here.

We think America
darn good place!
Too darn good for
the American Race.

If they no like us,
they can scram,
Got lots of room in


Saturday, December 15, 2007

20 Things We Know

1. 9/11 was not pulled off by "19 Arabs with box cutters."
2. Millions of illegal aliens have been allowed in to the United States and Congress has even tried to grant the law breakers amnesty, but law abiding visitors and citizens must get their fingerprints and pictures taken for entry into the country.
3. Iraq did not have weapons of mass destruction.
4. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.
5. Bin Laden, except as scapegoat, had nothing to do with 9/11
6. The mainstream media is involved in covering up what actually did happen on 9/11
7. Saddam Hussein had no ties with Al Qaeda.
8. Massive fraud occurred during both the 2000 and 2004 elections.
9. Few, if any, congressmen read the Patriot Act [sic] before they signed that sweeping legislation into law.
10. The federal government has been destroying the Constitution
11. American citizens are losing their liberties.
12.. Zionista Pelosi said, immediately after the 2004 election, "impeachment is off the table."
13. Michael Chertoff, head of the largest and most intrusive federal agency - Homeland Security - is a dual Israeli/US citizen.
14. According to the NIE, Iran is not building nuclear weapons.
15. The Jewish controlled mainstream media is purposely ignoring the candidacy of Ron Paul, who would immediately pull the military out of the Middle East.
16. The Jewish controlled mainstream media is nothing more than a propaganda machine for Zionism.
17. The time is drawing near for us citizens to take action.
18. There are millions more of us then there are of them.
19. We still have the right to bear arms.
20. We may need to use those arms.


Friday, December 14, 2007

Why Contacting Your 'Representative" is Futile

Below posted in full is a reply from my 'representative' in Congress to an email I sent telling him to impeach Bush and Cheney:

December 13, 2007

Dear Mr. Fockaert,

Thank you for contacting me regarding impeachment. I appreciate
you taking the time to share your concerns with me.

I certainly share your anger and frustration with the Bush
Administration. My record of criticism against this Administration
is extensive. From the devastating war in Iraq to the blatant attack
on our civil liberties to its harmful environmental policies, I
believe this Administration has taken our country in a dangerous

There is no doubt in my mind that this Administration is the worst
in my lifetime. However, while I have supported further study and
debate of impeachment, I believe impeachment proceedings are
not the best course of action at this time for two reasons:

First, impeachment hearings would bring our government to a
standstill for many months. Congress would be completely
consumed with the process of impeachment and we would not be
able to continue our efforts to take the country in a new direction.
Two prime examples of critical priorities that would suffer are: 1)
Our work on one the most forward-thinking energy bills in more
than 30 years and 2) Efforts to get 10 million children the
healthcare coverage they desperately need.

Second, an effort to impeach the president or vice president would
ultimately fail. Even if the House voted to initiate impeachment
proceedings, the Senate is the only body charged by the
constitution with trying impeachment. Right now, the Senate has a
very slim Democratic majority, and as a result, the Senate has been
unable to pass many important measures drafted by the Democratic
Leadership. Given its current make up, the Senate would never be
able to pass an impeachment provision. Therefore, I do not believe
we should bring our government to a standstill when we know that
impeachment would fail.

I do, however, believe it is important that we continue talking
about impeachment. This kind of discourse is what our democracy
is all about. That is why when a resolution by Congressman
Dennis Kucinich to initiate impeachment was recently brought to
the House floor, I voted in favor of the resolution because I
thought it deserved further debate. This resolution is now being
reviewed by the Judiciary Committee and I will continue to follow
its progress.

Meanwhile, Congress will continue holding the Bush
Administration accountable for its actions. Since the beginning of
this year, we have held dozens of hearings into the
Administration's actions, from the war in Iraq to the response to
Hurricane Katrina to its damaging environmental policies. If these
hearings find proof the President or the Vice President committed a
crime, then I will certainly support moving impeachment
proceedings forward in the House.

Again, thank you for sharing your passionate concerns with me.
Please continue to contact me on all issues of importance to you
and to our district.


Member of Congress

You cannot reply to this email. If you would like to email me, please

My reply was:

Mr. Thompson,

Your words:
I certainly share your anger and frustration with the Bush
Administration. My record of criticism against this Administration
is extensive. From the devastating war in Iraq to the blatant attack
on our civil liberties to its harmful environmental policies, I
believe this Administration has taken our country in a dangerous

The Bush Administration has taken this entire country in a 'dangerous direction,' but you don't support impeachment? But some smoke a joint and get busted or break the speed limit by five mph and pay the price? Next time I have to pay the price for breaking the law, I'll try your suggestion:

"....it is important that we continue talking about"
breaking the law "as that is what our democracy is all about."

We don't have a democracy Mr. Thompson, we had a Constitutional Republic, that is until representatives like you no longer represented us because you think that you were sent to Washington to do what you think needs doing - energy bills and health care for children - [why is it you politicians always hide behind children?] - rather than doing what your constituents tell you to do - which in this case is making our leaders obey the law of our land and when they don't you take steps to remove them from office whether those attempts fail or not.

"Please continue to contact me on all issues of importance to you
and to our district."

Why should I? it does no good.

You, Mr. Thompson, work for me and based upon the foregoing are unfit to represent me and my family, as you're not fulfilling your oath of office which is to uphold and defend the Constitution of these United States.


Charles Fockaert


Thursday, December 13, 2007

Don't Own a Gun? Buy one - now

Some Christians seem to think there is something wrong with owning - and having to use - a gun. There isn't.

"When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own house, his possessions are safe." Luke 11:21

Appears to this writer, that a strong man, when fully armed, guards his house, his possessions are safe, and those possessions must include his rights, that is, his right to liberty. And liberty is why we have the right, in the US, according to the Second Amendment of Bill of Rights, to bear arms - to protect our liberties.

Jesus Christ himself spoke those words recorded by Luke about a strong man being fully armed. This idea that a Christian is some how commanded to turn his cheek forever like a revolving door is ludicrous. There comes a point in time when a man, a strong man, must and should defend himself.

"He that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one." (Luke 22:36 KJV) The Roman sword was, at the time these words were spoken by Christ Himself, the equivalent of a modern handgun. It was the most practical and convenient form of self-defense available at that time. At least two of Jesus' disciples including Simon Peter, were in the habit of carrying their own personal swords, and Jesus never rebuked them. (See Luke 22:38.)

Don't have a gun? Buy one, or two, or more - now. And enough ammunition for a long war. Better yet, buy a re-loader's kit and enough supplies to reload your weapons.

It looks like we are going to have to defend our house and our possessions - sooner rather than later.


Thursday, November 22, 2007

US to Fingerprint Foreign Vistors But Let Illegal Immigrants Enter Without Visas

DHS to begin full fingerprint scans for visitors

The Homeland Security Department intends to begin scanning all 10 fingerprints for foreign visitors starting Nov. 29 at Dulles International Airport in Virginia, department officials said Tuesday.

Foreigners visiting the United States on visas must have a digital photograph taken and a scan of their two index fingers under the U.S. Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology program. DHS has built a database of 90 million fingerprints in the four years the program has been in operation.

Expansion to 10-finger scans, which has been in the planning stages for several years, is now beginning, Robert Mocny, U.S. Visit director, told journalists at the Foreign Press Center in Washington yesterday.

The 10-finger U.S. Visit scans are being rolled out at U.S. airports and at all land and sea border crossings, with a goal of being fully operational by the end of 2008, according to press reports of the briefing.


Fingerprint the foreign visitors who actually go through the trouble to get a legal visa but allow illegal immigrants to enter our country across our unprotected borders and once they get here, the Senate tries to give them amnesty and the governor of New York wanted to give the illegals driver's licenses until we the people revolted. Anyone else see anything wrong with this picture?

Department of Homeland Security, headed by the dual Israel/US citizen Chertoff, is not trying to stop terrorism. If they were concerned about stopping terrorism, they would close the borders. Instead, our government is building a Fascist Police State and this is one more solid step in that direction.


Wednesday, November 14, 2007

Airport screeners missed bomb parts

So goes the headline of a lead Yahoo news story. The story continues:

WASHINGTON - Government investigators smuggled liquid explosives and detonators past airport security, exposing a dangerous hole in the nation's ability to keep these forbidden items off of airplanes, according to a report made public Wednesday.


If this is the case, that is, government investigators are able to smuggle explosives past airport security, why aren't real terrorists getting aboard planes and committing acts of terrorism? If it's that easy to get past Transportation Safty Administration security, then why aren't all those terrorists that are supposed to be plotting to blow-up or hijack planes doing just that - smuggling bombs aboard planes and blowing them up or hijacking them?

The reason terrorist aren't doing just that is obvious: there are no terrorists within the United States who are trying to smuggle bombs aboard US flights.


Friday, November 09, 2007

Not My Problem

There is a saying that keeps wise people out of other people's troubles: "Not my Problem" or NMP. To say there are many problems in the world today, always has been and always will be, is a gross understatement. The question is, does the problem have any thing to do with me? If not, then the problem is NMP. It's somebody else's problem. So when I read the Jewish writer Matthew Rosenberg's piece entitled, "US worries rise over Pakistan crackdown" I think to myself, what goes on in Pakistan is not USrael's problem. The problem is, USrael is sticking their unwanted nose in everyone else's problems all over the world, and oftentimes, by nosing in, create more problems - bigger problems - than if they would just keep their noses out of other people's problems.

"We remain concerned about the continued state of emergency and curtailment of basic freedoms, and urge Pakistani authorities to quickly return to constitutional order and democratic norms," Gordon Johndroe, a spokesman for the National Security Council, said in a statement.


Can you imagine if Pakistani leaders said they were concerned about the continued rise of a fascist Police State in the US, which is indeed happening at this very moment in history, and that Pakistan was concerned about the erosion of constitutional freedoms, election fraud, illegal rendition, torture, the appointment of a torture supporting Attorney General by the torture supporting US Senate? If Pakistani leaders urged US leaders to return "constitutional order and democratic norms," the USrael leaders would go ballistic. USraeli leaders would no doubt tell the Pakistani leaders to keep their noses out of USrael internal affairs.

But when it comes to USrael sticking their long hook-noses into every country in the world because they say it concerns vital "USraeli interests" most people accept that as perfectly legitimate and virtually no one tells USrael to butt out. Why do so few tell USrael to butt out? Because of "aid."

And why is the American taxpayer giving money to Pakistan?

In Washington, where some lawmakers are calling for aid to Pakistan to be curtailed, U.S. officials again criticized Musharraf's crackdown.

USrael has gotten the US taxpayer so deep in un-repayable debt, by just this type of meddling, that is, giving "aid" to foreign countries, which are nothing more than bribes to foreign leaders. When the bribes don't work, that is, the foreign leaders don't do what USrael wants then to do, USraeli lawmakers 'call for aid to Pakistan' to be curtailed. Aid to Pakistan should never have been commenced, never mind curtailed.

USrael should keep their long hooked-noses out of every one's else's business, as their business ii none of the American citizen's business, and their problems are not our problems. Until their problems become our problems, we should take the view of wise men everywhere - "it's NMP." Or as Jefferson said, "beware of foreign entanglements."

We have enough of our own problems to deal with, and, as far as this writer can see, we're not doing too good with any of them.


Wednesday, November 07, 2007

Original Right of Self-defense

The founding fathers envisioned the several and individual states would be an adequate obstacle to the rise of tyranny by the national, i.e. federal, government. It was their intent – with the right of individual citizens of the various states to bear arms and form militias – that the states would rise up and provide the security needed to fight any federal usurpation of power by national leaders. That, as we well know, has not been the case. The individual states, over the last several decades, have been bribed and or coerced into conceding power granted by the US Constitution to the states, under the tenth amendment, to the federal government. Therefore, we the people are left without state protection against federal despotism.

That leaves us no choice but to fall back to our “original right of self defense” as Alexander Hamilton stated in Federal Paper # 28.

If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government....

There is no doubt that our representatives have betrayed us. They pass laws against our best interest – the Patriot Act, which U.S. District Judge Audrey Collins has already ruled that the ban on providing "expert advice or assistance" is impermissibly vague, and in violation of the First and Fifth Amendments of the US Constitution; the Military Commissions Act of 2006, which eliminated the right of habeas corpus, established way back in 1215, to American citizens; Public Law 109-364, or the "John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007, "allows the president to declare a "public emergency" and station troops anywhere in the United States and take control of state-based National Guard units without the consent of the governor or local authorities, in order to "suppress public disorder;" Most recently 404 members of the U.S. House of Representatives passed HR 1995 - called the 'Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007,’ which legally allows the government to label any one of us, at their discretion, a terrorist – “a radicalized homegrown terrorist” - and arrested. And let’s not forget the Senate Judiciary Committee approved for appointment for the office of attorney general of the United States, the highest official in the land charged with prosecuting criminals, Michael B. Mukasey, a man who is not sure if the same “enhanced interrogation” technique used by the Pol Pot regime in Cambodia in the 1970s - water boarding - is torture or not.

What we the people now face in these United States is a federal government that can declare anyone of us citizens a “radical homegrown terrorist” or an “enemy combatant” or both on any pretext and imprison us here in the US or flown abroad, without a writ of habeas corpus, without our families knowing where we are or what happened to us. While imprisoned, we can be water boarded in Pol Pot fashion in order to extract confessions from us regarding our alleged terrorist activities or to “re-educate” us. Meanwhile, if enough of us protest and create a “public emergency” the president, at his sole discretion, can overrule the governors of the states of these United States and commandeer the National Guard, i.e. the militia, of those States and send them, along with federal military troops, including the mercenary outfit - Blackwater - to suppress any and all dissent in any state of the union

Folks, get out of denial. What we have in the here and now in the United States is dry kindling meticulously set for martial law and the imposition of despotism.

What recourse is left for us? Alexander Hamilton also addressed that critical issue in Federalist Paper # 28.

The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair.

What Hamilton said in plain language was, when our representatives have betrayed us, we must rush tumultuously to arms, that is, without order, with an uproar, riotously, armed only with our weapons and our courage. That time has come. We must rush to arms to assert our original right of self-defense. Our way of life, our liberty is being threatened by domestic enemies, by our very own representatives, who have sold us out.

Come out of denial, stop with the self-delusion. Other than succumbing to slavery and tyranny, a rush to arms is our only and last option. Our representatives are not listening to our words. They need to be taught a history lesson, that this country was founded on the original right of self-defense.

Those of us who love liberty, aim to defend our liberty with weapons as is our right. And our duty.


Sunday, November 04, 2007

Waterboarding Was Considered Torture by the Cambodians

If U.S. attorney general nominee Michael Mukasey needs help in deciding whether waterboarding is torture or not, perhaps he should visit the Tuol Sleng Genocide Museum in Phnom Penh Cambodia, where these photos were taken. They depict the torture technique, or as Mukasey and his ilk prefer to refer to it - "enhanced interrogation technique" - used by the Pol Pot Khmer Rouge regime.



The Tuol Sleng Genocide Museum is located in the former Khmer Rouge S-21 Prison. How many years before people from around the world will visit a similar museum in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, depicting the "enhanced interrogation" technique known as waterboarding approved of and used by the Bush/Cheney Regime?


Monday, October 29, 2007

We're in Big Trouble

404 members of the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill - HR 1995 - called the 'Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007.' These traitors are so afraid that when we finally rise up and find solutions to the problems these politicians have created, they want to be able to deal with us legally since they won't be able to deal with us morally or ethically. They will be able to legally label anyone who disagrees with them, dissents or attempts to defend themselves or even thinks about defending themselves, as a terrorist and do what they feel is necessary to prevent the rest of us from dealing with them as we should - that is, as tyrannical treasonists.

It is simple unbelievable that in the United States over 400 congressmen voted for the passage of this bill - a bill that most of us didn't even know about - that would make us, at their discretion, a terrorist - a radical homegrown terrorist.

Read bill here: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h110-1955

Sponsor - Rep. Jane Harman [D-CA]
Passed the House of Representatives October 23, 2007.

"The Internet has aided in facilitating violent radicalization, ideologically based violence, and the homegrown terrorism process in the United States by providing access to broad and constant streams of terrorist-related propaganda to United States citizens."

The facts that we are finally able to get without being vetted through the Zionist controlled media is now referred to by these traitors as "terrorist-related propaganda."

"Understanding the motivational factors that lead to violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence is a vital step toward eradicating these threats in the United States."

These traitors have started a bogus international 'war on terrorism' while at the same time refusing to fully and objectively investigate 9/11, the event which started this entire bogus war on terrorism. Now they feel there is a need for "eradicating these [homegrown terrorist] threats in the United States."

If we Americans follow the lead of our founding fathers, and invoke our right to defend our rights, even if that means invoking use of the 2nd amendment, such defensive action could and most likely would be deemed "ideologically based violence" and dealt with accordingly, quite likely with the new mercenary force the government pols are now utilizing to protect themselves, Blackwater.

"Preventing the potential rise of self radicalized, unaffiliated terrorists domestically cannot be easily accomplished solely through traditional Federal intelligence or law enforcement efforts, and can benefit from the incorporation of State and local efforts."

In other words, the government can not prevent the rise of defensive forces within the United States composed of American citizens while remaining within the limits of the US Constitution. So the government is - through HR 1955 and other unconstitutional acts such as Public Law 109-364, aka the “John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007” (HR5122) - circumventing the Constitution and planning to incorporate State and local efforts with Federal i.e. military, efforts by commandeering local law enforcement - such as the individual state National Guard units - to be utilized where they see fit, i.e. in areas where violent protests are taking place.

"Any measure taken to prevent violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence and homegrown terrorism in the United States should not violate the constitutional rights, civil rights, or civil liberties of United States citizens or lawful permanent residents."

As if these traitors care about the Constitution. This was thrown in the text to be used to continue to fool those foolish enough to believe that these traitors don't have evil intentions or for those who are simple deluded.

Over 400 members of the House of Representative are traitors. When we finally decide to rise up and do something about these tyrants - "all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security" - we will be considered radical "homegrown terrorists."


Saturday, October 27, 2007

Terrorist Attack in Southern California

Southern California was attacked by a terrorist organization this past week.

Orange County, California (CNN) Radical Hispanic separatist organization MEchA (Movemiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan") is taking responsibility for setting the wildfires in California, confirmed Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. California Officials received a letter earlier today containing photographs of individuals holding Molotov cocktails, then throwing them into dry bush. The faces of the individuals appeared to have been digitally distorted.
This was posted on the CNN site briefly before being removed and not replaced.

Their attack resulted in over $1 billion dollars damage in San Diego county alone. The arson fires set resulted in over 1800 homes being destroyed, nearly 500,000 acres burned in an area stretching from Ventura County north of Los Angeles south to the Mexican border and east to the San Bernardino National Forest.

President Jorge W. Bush arrived in the fire scorched area to give words of comfort to the hundreds of thousands of residents evacuated from their homes."We want the people to know there's a better day ahead — that today your life may look dismal, but tomorrow life's going to be better," he said. "And to the extent that the federal government can help you, we want to do so."

Yeah, right Mr. Jorge Bush. Had you done your job in the first place, that is protect the borders of our country from the invasion of illegal immigrants, this fire may never have happened. Now, after the fact, you want to take credit for alleviating the pain and misery you could have prevented. And we haven't even brought up the billions you've wasted in Iraq and Afghanistan that could have been spent buying equipment - like helicopters - to fight this fire here on our own land. And our National Guard could of been here in our country, in our state, where they belong, fighting this fire, instead of ten thousand miles away fighting a war that you lied us into, for Israel.

Yes, Mr. Jorge Bush, this fire was started by terrorists, terrorist your administration, for the last seven years, has been allowing to invade our nation.


Monday, April 09, 2007

If You’ve Done Nothing Wrong, Why Worry?

We hear this ooze from the brainwashed all the time. If the government is eavesdropping on what you say, looking into your emails, watching you on camera or searching through your house or car, “If you’ve done nothing wrong, you’ve got nothing to worry about.” "Even the innocent have to give up some of their freedoms to catch the guilty," the thinking goes.

Problem with this 'logic' is that it assumes the government has rights and we the people don’t. All government employees, the last time I checked, be they law enforcement, immigration, custom officials, judges, district attorneys, politicians, or other bureaucrats, every single one of them, work for ‘we the people.’ That is, ‘we the people’ are the boss, not the other way around. Our employees have no right to spy on us, either in public or in our personal lives. They have no need – unless they have reasonable suspicion to believe that there are some among us who have committed or about to commit a crime – and then they must convince a judge to issue a warrant to investigate us for a crime – to be spying on us. And the reason for their surveillance of the potential criminals is to protect us, not gather information about us that may be used against us in some illegal or immoral way. Employees don’t conduct surveillance of their employers without a compelling reason.

The idea that if “we have done nothing wrong we have got nothing to worry about” has got things backwards. If we have done nothing wrong, they there is no need to be spying on us, is there? No need to be watching our every move.

We don’t see our employees - our bureaucrats - asking if they can aim the cameras at themselves, do we? That we install cctvs in their lunch rooms or aimed at the water cooler. No, it’s always the government that wants to aim the cameras at us to record what we are doing.

And yet it seems it’s the government that has something to hide. The service station across from the Pentagon had its cctv recordings confiscated by the FBI within minutes after an alleged hijacked plane crashed into the Pentagon. These recordings were taken on private property by private individuals for their private use, and yet a government agency, the FBI, came and demanded they be given to them, as evidence of a crime. True enough, the private cctv recordings may contain evidence of a crime, but why is it that we have only been shown two frames of what must be an entire recording? Why don’t our employees show us the entire recording and let us – the Employer – make up our minds for ourselves as to what hit the Pentagon? Perhaps it is our employees, the Federal government, that is the criminal in this case. If the government has nothing to hide, what are they worried about?

The same could be said for the Sheraton Hotel cctv recordings. They also must show what happened on 9/11 at the Pentagon, but we haven’t been shown those clips either. Ditto the cctv recordings of the dozens of cameras around the perimeter of the Pentagon. If the government has nothing to hide, what are they worried about? THEY are hiding something, and yet the cameras are facing us!

“I have nothing to hide, but I don’t like being treated as if I have.”

Nothing I do is necessarily ‘wrong’ but that doesn’t mean I want people I don’t know or trust to know about what I do or where I go or who I see, or what I say or listen to. I’ve done nothing wrong and have nothing to hide but I don’t want people looking at my medical information or my financial matters. Its none of their business.

The United States government has held several hundred people at Guantanomo Bay for several years and then let them go after the said they found they had done nothing wrong. Don’t do anything wrong but lose a few years of your life, get tortured as a bonus and then let go because you’ve done nothing wrong? Our government can do that and we don’t do anything about it?

The government is not full of good people. Quite, it appears, the opposite is the case. Good people are avoiding government – the bad has driven out the good. That being the case, I don’t want the government to be accumulating information about me that will most likely get into the hands of bad people. Why make it easier for them to get information about me? That's why the IRS now accuses people of tax evasion, presumes your guilty and you have to prove you're innocent.

The less our government, which is full of bad people, know about us, the better. In fact, since our government is so full of bad people,I suggest we install cameras to watch their every move.

If they are doing nothing wrong, they have nothing to worry about, do they?


Friday, February 16, 2007

Zionism and Zundel

The recent ‘trial’ in Germany of Ernst Zundel shows the rest of us goyim the power of Zionism intimidation. Through so called ‘hate-crime’ laws, the Zionists were able to get a man - legally in the United States - married to an American - extradited to Canada – to waste an entire year solitarily confined in a Canadian cell – considered a 'threat to national security' - denied simple everyday items such as writing materials – given only pencil stubs and scraps of paper on which to write – denied media access afforded to murderers and rapists – denied a chair or blankets - and then dragged to Germany for a kangaroo trial - held there two years without a conviction - for things said on a web site - run by his wife Ingrid Rimland - in a country where what was said was legal - and then sent to prison for five years - all of this for a man who is 67 years old.

Zundel’s crime? He refused to bend the knee.

All over the world, and particularly in the United States where Ernst Zundel was living, a person can deny God exists, deny Jesus Christ ever existed, refuse to believe the world was created with no problem. Atheists – there is no God – or agnostics – we don’t know if there is a God – are free to believe whatever they want to believe. Even Jews are left alone to believe that Jesus Christ was not their Messiah. They are even left alone even though they are responsible for His death – an ignoble death on a cross.

But are the Zionists content to let others believe what they want to believe about one chapter in history – the alleged holocaust – that allegedly took place over 60 years ago? Oh, no. They have actively worked to get so-called ‘hate crimes’ laws enacted in many countries – Canada, France, Germany and Austria among others. The Zionists have also been working over time to get similar ‘anti-Semitic’ hate crime laws enacted in the United States.

How hypocritical of the Western world to condemn and ridicule Muslims for taking offense at cartoons that mocked Mohammed – proclaiming loudly that the West cherished their right to freedom of speech and expression and that the Muslim world should too. The “coalition of the willing,” led by USrael, to make sure the Muslims institute freedom of expression, has been bringing democracy to the people of the Middle East – Iraq being the first phase and entitled 'Operation Iraqi Freedom.' For nations such as the United States, Canada and Germany, to extradite, detain unnecessarily for three years without a conviction and try - in a kangaroo court - and then imprison a man like Zundel, for freely expressing his belief that alleged atrocities that allegedly happened 60 years ago has been embellished and exaggerated since then and may not be as we have been told - is a atrocity in itself.

The West has been bombarded by the Zionist controlled media repeatedly with propaganda about the sacrosanct holocaust and the ‘six million’ for sixty years. To even question or investigate any aspect of the holy holocaust, the casus belli, not only for the state of Israel, but for every criminal act of genocide or apartheid they wish to commit, is to be attacked in acts of intimidation and tarred with the dreaded ‘anti-Semitic’ label, as President Jimmy Carter was just recently.

Enough is enough. Let’s hope the Muslims don’t get the idea to start incarcerating elderly Americans, Canadians, Frenchmen or Germans living within their countries for not believing Mohammed is the Prophet of God.


Wednesday, February 14, 2007

Censorship by Google in the United States

I received this email late Wednesday night after I attempted to view the video "The 9/11 Solution":


On 2/10/07 I posted “The 9/11 Solution”,
and since then our logs show that 19,802
have visited the page and seen the video.

Unfortunately, for reasons not clear, Google Videoremoved the video from their web site last night.

This morning I attempted to upload the video to

It was automatically removed:

“…due to terms of use violation.”

I have read the Terms & Conditions of both Google
Video and YouTube and there is nothing in this video that violates their written terms.

I am the video maker and am sole copyright
owner of the material.

The content is not illegal, an invasion of anyone’s privacy, obscene, an incitement of hate or violence,or a portrayal of graphic violence.

In short, they had no cause to remove it.



Why did Google remove the 9/11 Solution video?
What is on that video they don’t want us to see?
Is this China where Google goes along with the Communists and censorship?


Thursday, February 08, 2007

Wiping Israel off the Map

The Zionist controlled media is repeating the lie that "Iran wants to wipe Israel off the map" over and over again. As with any translating from one language, in this case Persian, into English, mis-translations can occur. And indeed they have but the Zionist benefit from such inaccuracies, and have thus made no effort to correct them.

Iran denies wanting to "wipe Israel off the map"

By Sebastian Alison | February 20, 2006

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - Iran's foreign minister denied on Monday that Tehran wanted to see Israel "wiped off the map," saying President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had been misunderstood.

"Nobody can remove a country from the map. This is a misunderstanding in Europe of what our president mentioned," Manouchehr Mottaki told a news conference, speaking in English, after addressing the European Parliament. "How is it possible to remove a country from the map? He is talking about the regime. We do not recognize legally this regime," he said.


Our dear Imam (referring to Ayatollah Khomeini) said that the occupying regime must be wiped off the map and this was a very wise statement. We cannot compromise over the issue of Palestine. Is it possible to create a new front in the heart of an old front. This would be a defeat and whoever accepts the legitimacy of this regime has in fact, signed the defeat of the Islamic world. Our dear Imam targeted the heart of the world oppressor in his struggle, meaning the occupying regime. I have no doubt that the new wave that has started in Palestine, and we witness it in the Islamic world too, will eliminate this disgraceful stain from the Islamic world. But we must be aware of tricks.[1]

Translation of phrase "wiped off the map"

Many news sources have presented one of Ahmadinejad's phrases in Persian as a statement that "Israel must be wiped off the map"[4][5][6], an English idiom which means to cause a place to stop existing[7].
Juan Cole, a University of Michigan Professor of Modern Middle East and South Asian History, translates the Persian phrase as:

The Imam said that this regime occupying Jerusalem (een rezhim-e ishghalgar-e qods) must [vanish from] the page of time (bayad az safheh-ye ruzgar mahv shavad).[8]

According to Cole, "Ahmadinejad did not say he was going to wipe Israel off the map because no such idiom exists in Persian" and "He did say he hoped its regime, i.e., a Jewish-Zionist state occupying Jerusalem, would collapse."[9]
The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) translates the phrase similarly:

[T]his regime that is occupying Qods [Jerusalem] must be eliminated from the pages of history.[10]

The liberal Zionist media is doing all it can to foment war against Iran. Repeating the lie that Iran wants to eliminate Jews from off the face of the map is just one of them. If Iran wanted to rid the Persian/Arab region of Jews, they could start within their own borders, where Jews and Christians, according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran are reserved seats in the Majles (Parliament).


Monday, January 29, 2007

The Way I See It

The Zionists were behind 9/11. Having control of over 90% of the mass media, they thought they could make sure that the lie that Al Qaeda and Osama Bin Laden were responsible would be told over and over again until it was believed. And by many, believed it was. And still is, but not by all.

Using 9/11 as the pretense, the Zionists attacked Afghanistan and Iraq, utilizing the US military, in their so-called and never ending 'war on terror." Simultaneously, they attacked what was left of our liberties in the United States, which liberties, along with Islamics, are the Zionists' major potential enemies.

They started Christian America fighting Islam - Huntington's 'clash of cultures.' The Zionist will not stop there. Using their puppet, George Bush, 'the decider,' who is deciding to do all things not in the best interests of America, but of Israel, they will continue to beat the war drums against Iran as they prepare to attack that nation next, quite likely with nuclear weapons, as a display of their superior power.

In Iran, like Iraq, the mission will not be easily accomplished. Iran will counter, and WWIII will rapidly expand into other parts of the Middle East and beyond. Oil flow, the lifeblood of any economy, will be disrupted and along with it the ecomomies in much of the world. China and Russia, as a counter to Zionist power and hegemony in the Middle East, will intercede on behalf of Iran.

What is left of the Constitution - that 'goddamned piece of paper' - will be ignored by the very ones it was designed to keep in check, the US government, as an outdated document that has not kept up with our 21st Century problems and issues, ie, their plans for complete control over the American citizenry.

Elections in the US will finally be seen by a great majority as worthless. This majority will also realize that Congress, to the man, is corrupt or its members blackmailable. The one or two exceptions, like Ron Paul, don't have a chance of making it into office. They'd be eliminated, ala Paul Wellstone, long before that ever happened.

In short, the US government is going to do what ever it wants to do, and that isn't good for the people of America.

It will be criminal to deny both of the Zionist's plots, the Holocaust and the Official Government 9/11 Conspiracy Theory. Deny either - go to jail.

Illegal aliens, as planned, will continue to flood into the United States, bringing crime and disease with them, and now, social security benefits back home with them. This will be encouraged by the politicians and our government, despite our demands. Stife between minorities and the now awakened white majority will make our major cities battlefields. Agent provocateurs, black ops and false flag ops will proliferate in the United States. Another 9/11 type event will occur, and be blamed on Islamic extremists and other so-called white hate groups working within the US. Many will be arrested in newly and hastily passed 'hate-crime' laws.

When the dollar finally collapses as planned, and economic chaos ensues as planned, the millions of dis-enfranchised and un-employed will take to the streets. The Police State that has become America will be mobilized. The military will be called out to restore order, never mind the Posse Comitatus Act, that's been negated. Many dissenters and other 'terrorists' will be thrown into the detention camps Cheney's Halliburton is busy building. Many of these people will be tortured and never heard of or from again, as habeas corpus is no more in America.

The internet, that has been the bane of the Zionists and other enemies of the people of the free world, will be severely interrupted, disrupting communication between the unorganized splintered groups trying to fight the tyranical behemoth waging war against them. Rumors will abound.

Many alarmed citizens will attempt to leave the US. Those formerly helping the illegal immigrants come into the United States, will be helping Americans flee the United States.

Most of America's elites will be safe in their enclaves - like Cheney on his ranch in Wyoming, Bush in Crawford, Bremmer in his newly purchased house on the lake next to Bush Senior in Switzerland. If things get too out of hand, George Bush, Laura and their twin daughters will high-tail it to their newly acquired property - 173,000 acres - in Paraquay. They will, of course, be protected by the military located at Mariscal Estigarribia. And convenietly, Paraguay has granted American military personnel immunity from prosecution by the national and International Criminal Court (ICC) jurisdiction. We can safely assume, as Commander in Chief, this includes George W. "Mission Acomplished' Bush.

However, many of the disenfrachised will see the chaos as an opportunity to settle old scores against the thousands of corrupt politicians, judges, attorneys and other misfits that have made life miserable for honest citizens. Many otherwise law abiding and upright citizens will take matters into their own hands.

All the various factions that have been fighting peacemeal the Zionist Bush Regime will finally realize that they need to unite in their struggle against the tyranny facing them. No one will care any longer about being labeled an anti-Semite. Many innocent Jews, because they will be easier prey than the Zionist elites, will be blamed for the chaos and persecuted.

What the end result will be is anyone's guess. Odds are in favor of the people, but perhaps only after a long and bloodly battle.