I Thessalonians 5:20, 21

Do not despise expounding of scripture, but scrutinize all things. Hold fast that which is right.

Malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium

- I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery.


See also Kerux Replies at Wordpress.com where all future missives will also be posted.

However, because Wordpress charges an outrageous $59.95 a year for a video upload upgrade, videos will only be linked, not embedded.

Saturday, December 07, 2013

Can Adamic Man Know God?

Many believe, especially "non-religious" White nationalists, that all religious beliefs are based on faith, not hard, provable, objective data. Many also believe mankind is incapable of conceptualizing the true nature of God.

I would suggest both of these beliefs are false.

Scripture, archaeology and history is full of "hard, probable objective data." The God of Scripture, Yahweh, moved entire nations to work his will - His Story - in the world throughout time. Scripture foretold (prophesied) this history and Yahweh, through His People and through other nations / peoples, brought about his will. All one needs is an understanding of Scripture, history and archaeology to see how Yahweh has brought what his prophets have accurately foretold throughout history.

Most people have little or no knowledge of Scripture, history or archaeology and thus do not realize that faith is based upon fact.

Yahweh has made every effort to enable Adamic man, created in His image, to conceptualize their God. "In the beginning was the Word (or Logos). And the Logos was with God, and the Logos was God. .... And the Word / Logos was made flesh, and dwelt among us and we beheld his glory, as of the most beloved of the Father, full of grace and truth. No man has seen Yahweh at any time; the most beloved Son, he has declared him." verses John 1:1,14,18.

Words express thoughts. Mankind communicates through language, words. We, Adamic man - (there are no other "men," made in the image of God) can know God's thoughts because we are created in His image, in his likeness. God has communicated, has expressed himself, who he is, not only through his written Word, but through his beloved son, the living Word, who has declared God, made the Creator known.

Adamic White man (endowed with God's spirit) can conceptualize the true nature of God, by examining the life of Yahshua Christ, the Kinsman Redeemer who paid the penalty for His People's transgression of His Law to bring His People back to himself. Yahweh's spirit communicates with our spirit that we are children of God. John 4:24; I John 2:27.

Adamic man can also get an understanding of the nature of Yahweh through His creation: Romans 1:19: Because what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. 20 For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse."

However, many suppress this truth of Yahweh's nature, his eternal power, his divine nature, in an unrighteous manner and then say that God cannot be known by man. 

Don't let anyone fool you into thinking that the God of Scripture cannot be known to you. Look at nature, look at the creation surrounding you to understand just a small part of Yahweh's limitless power and divine nature.

Examine the life and teachings of Yahweh himself as Yahshua the living Word, found within the written Word of God to get an idea of his grace and truth, how much he loves and cares for you, His People.

Praise Yahweh! 


Sunday, November 24, 2013

New Testament Only Christians

To all you New Testament only Christians: if the Old Testament is no longer relevant, why is Abraham - with whom Yahweh made an everlasting unconditional covenant with (aka the Abrahamic Covenant) - mentioned 69 times in the New Testament? 

These so-called Christian bozos ignore the fact that there was no New Testament Scriptures in the early church period. The earliest Christians ONLY had the Old Testament. Paul the apostle quotes from the OT dozens of times in the New Testament. How does a New Testament Christian understand Paul's teaching if they don't believe the Old Testament is relative today? 

Further, what about the fulfillment of OT prophecy in the New Testament period?  Simply search the word fulfilled, referring to prophecy from the OT testament fulfilled in the NT period and later and you will find the word occurs 57 times in the New Testament. One such occurrence is Luke 4:21 "And he began to say unto them, This day is this scripture fulfilled in your ears," referring to Isaiah 61:2. Notice he leaves out "day of venegance," which will be fulfilled soon.

Additionally, there is the passage "All scripture is inspired by Yahweh and is profitable for doctrine, for conviction for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of Yahweh may be complete, thoroughly furnished unto all good works. 2 Tim. 3:16,17.   When Paul wrote that admonishment to Timothy, they only had the Old Testament. How could Timothy comply if he was to ignore the OT? How can one be thoroughly furnished unto all good works if one omits the doctrines found within the OT?

My guess is that many of these so-called Christians who only follow the NT believe the OT applies to the jews. While I have news for them: the OT applies to the Israelites, not the jews, as the jews are not the Israelites of the OT. If they actually read and studied their bibles closely they just might learn that important fact.  

Many more Christians believe that Yahweh did away with the Old Testament law. The reality is that the rituals involved in the sacrifices were what was done away with, not the entire law. Yahshua himself said: 17 “Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish but to fulfill. 18 For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke shall pass from the Law until all is accomplished. 19 Whoever then annuls one of the least of these commandments, and teaches others to do the same, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever keeps and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. Matthew 5:17-19. 

The law was given ONLY to the Israelites and the 12 Tribes of the nation of Israel are the Caucasians - the Anglo-Saxon-Scandinavian-Celtic-Germanic and kindred peoples of the world. And it is only the Israelites who should be obeying them.Most of those laws are found within the Old Testament: laws regarding marriage, dietary laws, economic laws, legal principles, etc.

The law - minus the rituals - found in the Old Testament are indeed appropriate and applicable to all Israelites today. Any one who annuls one of the least of these commandments and teachers others to do the same, shall be the least in the kingdom of heaven. There are going to be quite a few called the least in the kingdom of heaven. Don't you be one of them.


Sunday, November 17, 2013

Cain Was Not a Son of Adam

 Here's the evidence found in Scripture that Cain was not the son of Adam.

Jude 14 And Enoch, seventh from Adam, prophesied to these saying “Behold, the Prince has come with ten thousands of His saints 15 to execute judgment against all and to convict every soul for all of their impious deeds which they committed impiously and for all of the harsh things which the impious wrongdoers have spoken against Him!”

Jude seems to be referring to Enoch 1:9, which says in the Charles edition: “9. And behold! He cometh with ten thousands of His holy ones, to execute judgement upon all, and to destroy all the ungodly: and to convict all flesh of all the works of their ungodliness which they have ungodly committed, and of all the hard things which ungodly sinners have spoken against Him.”

Note that Jude calls Enoch “seventh from Adam”. In Charles' 1 Enoch, at chapter 60 verse 8 Enoch is also called the “seventh from Adam”. Adam himself does not count here, Enoch being seventh from Adam. Therefore, either Cain or Abel – but not both, must be included in this reckoning in order to arrive at 7 first-born males. There is no other way to reckon Enoch as “seventh from Adam” within the confines of Scripture. What can this refer to, except first-born males?

Seth, replacing the murdered Abel, therefore inherits the rights of the first-born from him. So we have: 1-Abel 2-Seth 3-Enos 4-Cainan 5-Mahalaleel 6-Jared 7-Enoch, and this also demonstrates the exclusion of Cain from his birth.

Thanks to Don Brown for writing this up - saved me the time. 


Saturday, October 12, 2013

The Evil of Those Soon to be Stubble

The evil of those soon to be stubble (Obadiah 18) is so far beyond the ability of most naive, gullible, so easily duped Whites to comprehend, they have the illusion of "that can't happen here" while suffering from a little discussed type of bias, normalcy bias. The deception has been so far reaching, it boggles the White mind. Whites have the problem of projecting how they are unto others who are in no way like them, and do not follow the same law we have written in our hearts.

That is why the Big Lie works: Whites simply can not believe others can and would lie so easily and on such a grand scale: eg., the holocaust. The first lie was "ye shall not surely die, for Yahweh does know, that in the day you eat thereof, then your eyes will be opened and you shall be as Yahweh, knowing good and evil." It all started at the "Tree of the Knowledge of Good AND Evil." Our race knew not evil until Nachash (the Enchanter, Magician) seduced Eve and produced Cain. Evil destroys all it touches, hence Cain, who according to Josephus was a hybridizing farmer who "forced the ground," (prelude to Monsanto) slew his brother, Abel.

This Stubble have been murderers since the beginning, and yet most Whites believe this same stubble, who would murder them in a heartbeat once given the chance, are Yahweh's Chosen. How big of a deception is that?


Friday, September 27, 2013

And the tree of knowledge of good and evil

"And the tree of knowledge of good and evil." Genesis 2:9. As mentioned in other missives, Nachash, the enchanter / magician, seduced Eve to commit adultery, and that union resulted in Cain. Apparently Eve was a virgin when this "eating of the apple" occurred. When you mix good with evil, you always get evil. We've been offered the lesser of two evils for decades now. 

to be added to as time allows. 


First edit: 

The tree of good and evil is, according to George Lamsa, a Hebrew idiom, with a metaphorical meaning of - sexual relationship. 


Sunday, September 01, 2013

Scofield Reference Bible Deception

A major deception promoted by the judeo-christian zionists like Hagee is found in the Scofield Reference Bible in the notes for Genesis 12:2: 

12 Now the Lord had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father's house, unto a land that I will shew thee:
And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing:
And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.

"It has invariably fared ill with the people who have persecuted the Jew - well with those who have protected him. For a nation to commit the sin of anti-Semitism brings inevitable judgment." 
C. I. Scofield, notes, page 19, 1967 Edition Oxford University Press.

First off, this verse is in reference to Abram, who was not a jew. 

Second, since when is anti-Semitism a sin? No where in Scripture is this "sin" found. 

Third, since when can a nation - collectively - commit anti-Semitism? 

Fourth, jews don't descend from Shem, but from Cain/Esau, and therefore cannot be Semites. So,  how can "persecuting" the jew be anti-Semitism?

Fifth, who brings this alleged judgment upon those who "persecute" the jew? Certainly not the God of Scripture, as He says He hates Esau (Malachi 1:2), refers to the jews as being "of their father the devil" (through Cain/Esau, not Jacob/Israel - John 8:44), calls the jews the antichrists, (I John 2:18) and of the assembly of satan (the adversary) (Revelation 2:9, 3:9).

Lastly, if it has fared well with those who have protected the jew, why is the United States now in rapid decline as a nation, over $18 trillions in debt ($220 trillion if all liabilities are included)  and is being invaded with non-Whites (since the jew - Celler and Javits - promoted 1965 Immigration Act) who are turning the once great White nation into a third world cesspool? 

How well do YOU feel because your nation has "protected the jew?"

And pray tell us, how have "all the families of the earth been blessed" by the jew? The European nations, deep in debt due to Jewish control of the European Union, the Euro currency, the IMF, are collapsing - starting with Greece, to be followed soon by Spain, and Portugal with more to follow until the entire house of Jewish usury based fiat currency fails.

The one nation that told the Jews to take their banking system and stick it, Iceland, is doing just fine isn't it? So much for those who curse the jews will be cursed. The reality is the exact opposite.


Monday, May 13, 2013

Perilous Times Are Here

This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. 2 Timothy 3:1

Perilous - hard to take, hard to bear, troublesome, dangerous.

"2 For men shall be lovers of their own selves ...."

So many "resist the truth." So many are set against the truth, so many are opposed to the truth. (v. 8) They simply refuse to accept the truth.

We live in perilous times, yes? This morning, once again, I am weary of hearing of the troubling news, the problems, the evil all around us. Haughty, pride filled traitors in charge. (v.4)

What is the "secret" of surviving during these trouble filled times?


v. 16: All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for education in righteousness:

17 That the man of Yahweh may be perfect, (mature) thoroughly furnished unto all good works.

Spend time in Scripture - reading, educating yourself, soaking in the Word of Yahweh. Soak in Yahweh's truth. More importantly, believe His Word, by making His Word your "course of life" by living it day-by-day.


Friday, May 10, 2013

Givers and Takers

Basically, two types of people exist: the Givers and Takers. You can usually spot a Taker because once a Taker realizes they can no longer take from you, you never hear from them again. They take as much and for as long as they can, and then forget about you. They don't contact you to see how you're doing, because they don't care how you're doing; they only seem to "care" about you when they think they can, in one way or another, get more from you. 

Takers don't usually prosper, because a person who sows sparingly also reaps sparingly.

In contrast, a Giver doesn't want anything from others; a Giver simply wants to give - because a Giver knows there is more blessing in giving than receiving. (Acts 20:35) A Giver will contact you to see how you're doing, simply because a Giver actually does care about you, and not for what they can get from you.

A Giver is usually prosperous in many ways: cheerful, content, not selfish, has a positive attitude, is outward focused and generally a good person to be around. A Giver is a good person to have as a friend.

Which are you: A Taker or a Giver? 


Sunday, March 24, 2013

Are You an Israelite Sheep or a Judeo-Christian Sheeple?

There are well over four dozen references to sheep found in the Old Covenant (Old Testament or OT) and the New Covenant (New Testament or NT) Scriptures. What is one characteristic of sheep? Sheep follow each other. 

This missive discusses the difference between true Israelite sheep and judeo-christian sheeple. Israelite sheep tend to examine the Scripture without bringing to their studies any preconceived ideas. Israelite sheep examine the biblical text, including the original Hebrew and Greek texts, especially  the original Hebrew and Greek texts, and not just the multitude of English language versions of translations; the context wherein those texts are found, use proper exegesis, and come away with an accurate interpretation of what the Scripture actually says, despite what the text says, and not what they want it to say.   

A true Christian Israelite will “prove all things, hold fast to that which is good.” I Thes. 5:17. 

Judeo-christian sheeple, on the other hand, tend to only read their bibles, if they read them at all, superficially. Rarely do they dig into the meanings of the words they read in the Greek or the Hebrew, the languages the Scriptures were written in. Having lived in four different countries, all using a different language, Spanish, Thai, Arabic and Korean, I have learned first-hand that getting a proper translation from one language to another, is not an easy process. Using the wrong word, when a different word could just as easily have been used, quite often gives a totally different meaning to the text than the intended meaning. Translating the bible from Hebrew and Greek into English is no different; wrong English words are often used, leading to entirely different understandings by the reader than what was intended by the author. Judeo-christian sheeple tend to ignore the additional meaning words used in Scripture may have, and thereby miss the true meaning of the passage. 

Judeo-christian sheeple also tend to ignore the context of the passage under examination.  For example, the book of Romans was written by Paul in the first century A.D., to Romans, not to the 21st century Mongolians, or the Aborigines of Australia. Paul was of the tribe of Benjamin, the Romans were one of the tribes of Israel. (Judah) This is the context of Romans. Taking Paul's message to the Romans and appling it to any other non-Israelite tribe is simply error. It would be like writing a letter to a family member, and someone, outside your family, applying to themselves the contents of that letter. You would think that application to be ridiculous. But that is exactly what millions of judeo-christians do when they attempt to apply Scriptures written by Israelites, about Israelites, for Israelites and to Israelites, to any other people.

Judeo-christian sheeple also tend to look around them, at the other sheeple they associate themselves with, and don’t see many Israelites. They don’t see any mega-churches that teach that the 12 Tribes of Israel are actually the Anglo-Saxon-Scandinavian-Celtic-Germanic and kindred peoples of the world. With this limited world view, they erroneously assume the Christian Identify message can't be the true interpretation of Scripture. Jerry Falwell didn’t teach this message. Pat Robertson doesn’t teach this message and look at the mega-ministry Pat Robertson has; surely Robertson and all those millions of his followers can’t be wrong, can they? John Hagee’s Christians United for Israel is a worldwide ministry reaching millions of judeo-christian-zionists and raises millions of dollars for Israel every year. Hagee and all those millions of judeo-christians can’t be wrong, can they? 

Or can they be wrong?

Let’s examine Scripture together, shall we? 

The use of sheep as a metaphor for the people of Yahweh are used by the Psalmists, for example,  “For he is our God; and we are the sheep of his pasture, and the sheep of his hand.” Pslam 95:7. “Know ye that the Lord he is God: it is he that hath made us, and not we ourselves; we are his people, and the sheep of his pasture.” Psalm 100:3 and Psalm 119:176: “I have gone astray like a lost sheep;”
The most famous of the psalms is, of course, Psalm 23: “The LORD is my shepherd,” obviously indicating that the author of the psalm, King David, himself a shepherd, also considered himself, metaphorically, a sheep. 

References to the Israelites as sheep are also found in the major prophets, such as Isaiah 53:6: “All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the Lord hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.” The image of a sheep before her shearers is used to provide us with the submissiveness with which Yahshua Christ willingly yielded to his oppressors in Isaiah 53:7: “He was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he opened not his mouth: he is brought as a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is dumb, so he openeth not his mouth.”

The prophet Jeremiah refers to the Israelites as “scattered sheep” in 50:6; as “scattered, devoured sheep" with “bones broken”  by Nebuchadrezzar king of Babylon in 50:17. 

The priest - prophet, in exile in the land of the Chaldeans, Ezekiel, talks of the Israelite “sheep (who) wandered through all the mountains, and upon every hill, yea, my flock was scattered upon all the face of the earth, and none did search or seek after them.” Ezekiel 34:6. He predicts the Lord God  “will both search my sheep, and seek them out.” Ezekiel 34:11, and verse 12: “As a shepherd seeketh out his flock in the day that he is among his sheep that are scattered; so will I seek out my sheep, and will deliver them out of all places where they have been scattered in the cloudy and dark day.”

In Micah 2:12, Yahweh uses sheep as a simile,  for the tribe of Jacob, and when referring to the remnant of Jacob "among the nations in the midst of many people as a lion among the beasts of the forest, as a young lion among the flocks of sheep” in Micah 5:8. Zechariah 13:7 refers to "scattered sheep of Judah" when the shepherd is smitten. 

Notice, every single mention of the word sheep above, taken from the OT, refers to Israelites. No other people are included. Notice particularly Pslam 95:7: "Know ye that the Lord he is God: it is he that hath made us, and not we ourselves; we are his people, and the sheep of his pasture.”

“We are his people, the sheep of his pasture.” Connect this psalm with Amos 3:2: “You only have I known of all the families of the earth;” Verse 1 of Amos 3 shows the context of this verse, i.e., who this family is: “Hear this word that the LORD has spoken against you, O children of Israel, against the whole family which I brought out of the land of Egypt.” Only one family did Yahweh bring out of Egypt; the family of Jacob/Israel. Only one family has Yahweh known of all the families of the earth; the family of Jacob/Israel. 

How much plainer does it have to be? If there is a problem interpreting the meaning of these verses, the problem lies with the person doing the interpretation, not any alleged difficulty inherent within the text. If there is a difficulty understanding the meaning of these verses, the difficulty is in the refusal of the student accepting  the clear meaning of the passages, not the passages themselves. 

Moving into the New Testament, the NT being the only portion of the bible many, if not most of those trapped within the judeo-christian cult actually read, we find numerous uses of sheep as a simile for the members of the family known as the twelve tribes of Israel. 

“But when he saw the multitudes, (while Yahshua went about in all the cities and villages of Judaea – see Matthew 9:35; that is the multitudes were Judaeans) he was moved with compassion on them, because they fainted, and were scattered abroad, as sheep having no shepherd.” Matthew 9:36

“And Jesus, when he came out, saw much people, and was moved with compassion toward them, because they were as sheep not having a shepherd: and he began to teach them many things.” Mark 6:34.  The context is the same as in Matthew 9:36, that is, in Judah. 

“And Jesus saith unto them, All ye shall be offended because of me this night: for it is written, I will smite the shepherd, and the sheep shall be scattered.” Mark 14:27, quoting from Isa. 53:5, 10; Zechariah 13:7. 

Yahshua Christ used sheep in many of his parables, including: Mathew 18:12, 13 and Luke 15:4-6.
Christ refers to himself as “the door of the sheep,” John 10:7; as the “good shepherd,” John 10:11 and 14, that he “lay down his life for the sheep.” John 10:15. 

Who are these sheep? The Israelites of the 12 Tribes of Israel. 

Further evidence that the sheep are the Israelites of the 12 Tribes of Israel is found in Yahshua Christ’s instructions to his disciples recorded by Matthew in 10:5,6: “Go ye not into the way of the heathen, and into any city of the Samaritans enter not, but rather, go to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” Judeo-christians like to ignore this Scripture, the very words of Yahshua Christ himself, explaining in clear unmistakable language to what people he was sent to: “I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” Matthew 15:24. Nowhere in all of Scripture is this clear statement contradicted.

I’ve had numerous judeo-christians quote Matthew 28:19, the passage they like to call “The Great Commission.” “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations ….” They say everything changed after the resurrection. That the gospel was, at that point in time, no longer limited to just the jews, (sic) but was now available to all the nations, (the KJV uses a Latin word, Gentile, which they want us to believe means non-jews) because the jews had crucified Christ and thus rejected Christ as their Messiah.” 

These same judeo-christians will also most often admit that Jesus Christ is the same "yesterday, today and forever,” but that He changed his mind on the most important message in all of history – and the gospel of salvation - which was promised exclusively to the 12 Tribes of Israel, his people, the sheep of his pasture, the one family of all the families of the earth that he knew – was now open to the vast heathens throughout  the world. 

Nothing could be further from the truth. 

Let’s take a closer look at the word nations used in Matthew 28:19, the "Great Commission" passage. The word is ethnos, (Strong’s G1484) and the meaning Strong’s gives it is; a race, as of the same habit, that is, a tribe, same nature or genus, people group. 

Thayer’s (Eighth Edition – Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament) the definition of ethnos given is: 1. A multitude (whether of men or of beasts) associated or living together, a company, a troop. Swarm. 2. a multitude of individuals of the same nature or genus. 3. Race, nation. 

When one takes this Great Commission command, in context of the entire Scripture, the race, or multitude of individuals, the nation of same habit, the tribe with the same nature, or people group is clearly the 12 Tribes of Israel, the same family called the scattered sheep in Zechariah 13:7 and Ezekiel 34:12. 

What did Yahshua command Peter to do to show his love for Christ? Feed “His sheep.” It should be clear by now who “his sheep” were. Peter, following these instructions of Christ, addresses his first epistle to “the elect sojourners of the dispersion of Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia and Bithynia.” In tThe KJV we have: “to the sojourners scattered throughout …” Who are these sojourners scattered through the Mediterranean Sea area? James tells us they are the “twelve tribes which are scattered abroad …” James 1:1. 

What was the message of Peter to these sojourners scattered abroad? “For ye were as sheep going astray; but are now returned unto the Shepherd and Bishop of your souls.” 1 Peter 2:25

If Matthew 28:19 meant all the nations of the world, the Mongolians, the Africans, the Chinese, the Koreans, the Thais, the Cambodians, the Polynesians, all the other peoples found on the planet, then he would have used a different Greek word, allophulous, foreign, of another race, (allos - another, phulon - a tribe) the very word Luke used in Acts 10:28.  

If Matthew 28:19 meant all the nations of the world, the Mongolians, the Africans, the Chinese, the Koreans, the Thais, the Cambodians, the Polynesians, all the other peoples found on the planet, then all the apostles disobeyed the command of Christ, because none of the apostles went to any of those peoples. There is no record of any missionary journeys to any of these non-Israelite people by any of the apostles. Zero. Zilch. None. 

There is no historical record of any of the apostles writing any epistles to any of those peoples. Where is the epistle to the Chinese? The tribes of Africa? The natives of Peru?  The Mayans?  Zero. Zilch. None.

The message of Scripture is clear: “I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”
Christ told us “Other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: (not here in Judaea) them also I must bring and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold and one shepherd.” These “other sheep” were the sheep scattered throughout the Adamic world, the area around the Mediterranean Sea, the very area Paul went to on his three missionary journeys. 

We were warned by Yahshua Christ himself to “beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.” And that he was sending out his disciples “as sheep in the midst of wolves: be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves.” 

We’ve been deceived by the wolves in sheep’s clothing, by false teachers, into believing that non-Israelites, non-members of the 12 Tribes of Israel, are the sheep Christ came to save.
Matthew 25 explains what is to take place in that day, that is, at the end of the age: 

31 When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory:32 And before him shall be gathered all nations: (ethnos) and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats:33 And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left.34 Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world:35 For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in:36 Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me.

He shall set the sheep – the members of the 12 Tribes of Israel – on His right hand, and all the other people, the goats, on his left hand. 

THAT is what Scripture says. Whether you like it or not, whether you believe it or not, whether or not that is not what most people believe makes NO difference: THAT is what Scripture says and the entire context of Scriptures gives witness to this fact. 

It doesn’t matter what Jerry Falwell taught; it doesn’t matter if Pat Robertson teaches another gospel, it doesn’t matter if John Hagee doesn’t agree, and it doesn’t matter that the Scofield Reference Bible teaches doctrine completely contrary to the evidence laid out within this missive.

What matters is, “what saith the Scripture?”


Tuesday, March 19, 2013

The Early Greeks Were Israelites

Far too many White nationalists, Odinists and other Nordic pagans simply can not accept the fact that the earliest Greeks and Romans were in reality Israelites, of the 12 Tribes of Israel, not to be confused with the jews. Hebrews were not jews; they were Israelites.  See Was Abraham or Moses a Jew?

The jews have been able to deceive unwitting Christians, who believe the jews are "God's Chosen" and those, like the White nationalists,  who do not accept Scripture as the Word of God because they believe it is a "jewish book." The bible is an Israelite book; written by Israelites, about Israelites, for Israelites and to  Israelites and no other peoples. The jews have these Judeo-Christians and White nationalists believing the jews  are the Israelites of the Old Testament and therefore these White nationalists, understandably,  want nothing to do with the bible.  This is unfortunate, as the bible is anything but a jewish book. It is a racial book, a "White nationalist" book from cover to cover. 

Many of the earliest "Greeks" were with Joseph in Egypt. The historian Diodorus Siculus stated in his Library of History that the Athenians came from "Sais in Egypt." Sais was the area where Goshen was, in the Nile Delta, one of the most fertile areas of Egypt, where the Jacob/Israel family settled while Joseph was #2 in all of Egypt. From there they sailed and traded/migrated throughout the Med. Sea / Levant region. 

The 12 Tribes were in the Goshen/Sais area for 215 years before Moses led the others out of Egypt into Palestine. During that extended time period, and before "there arose a new king that knew not Joseph," the "children of Israel were fruitful, and increased abundantly and multiplied and became exceedingly mighty, and the land was filled with them." Ex. 1:6,7. 

"They say also that those who set forth with Danaus, likewise from Egypt, settled what is practically the oldest city of Greece, Argos, and that the nations of the Colchi in Pontus and that of the Jews, (sic - Israelites)  which lies between Arabia and Syria, were founded as colonies by certain emigrants from their country . . ." (Diodorus, Bk. I, xxviii, 1-5).

Early Danites fled Egypt at the time just prior to the Exodus, and migrated through SarDINia, and left their trail along the sea-coasts of the Mediterranean. Thus Dan, who was a "lion's whelp" who would "leap from Bashan," leaped all the way to Ireland, where historians explain that the early settlers were known as the "Tuatha de Danaan" -- literally, the "tribe of Dan." The Greeks called them the Danoi, the Romans called them Danaus.

 Israelites, for the most part, founded Greece and Rome and many other areas, including the Iberian (Hebrew) Peninsula. Israelite traders sailed through the Straits of Gibraltar, up the western coast of Iberia, all the way to the British Isles, which was referred to in Scripture as "the ends of the earth." It was these Israelite/Hebrew/Phoenician traders who most likely started the rumor/myth that the world was flat, to protect their trade monopoly. 

Evidence shows that these traders may have sailed as far away as the Great Lake region - Upper Michigan - in North America, in search of tin. (See Barry Feld's America B.C.) As early as 1500 years before Christ, Hebrew/Israelite traders had ships large enough to haul cargo back to the Mediterranean Sea area. It was from this trade that Joseph of Arimathea, great uncle of Jesus Christ, made his wealth trading with the Roman empire this metal for their weapons and other goods.

Paul mentions to the Romans, (fellow Israelites) that "the Yahweh of peace shall crush the Adversary under your feet shortly" in Romans 16:20. The Romans were of the Tribe of Judah.

White nationalists may not like or accept what the Scripture, archaeology and history states about the earliest history of the White race. They may resist, fight and even reject what the evidence clearly indicates, but their reasons for rejecting these facts are based upon reasons other than what can be found in the historical record or Scripture. 

Perhaps these White nationalists want to be able to live their lives just like the early Israelite pagans did, before they heard the gospel of the Kingdom God preached to them by the apostles who were sent out to the "lost sheep of the house of Israel." 


Sunday, March 03, 2013

Are You Putting God in a Box of Your Making?

The only people I can find that Yahweh (God does have a name) made the promise of preservation to was the physical seed i.e., descendants, of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel. Genesis 15:5; 17:2-8;22: 15-18; 26:3-5.

Christians today like to separate the OT from the NT, something neither Christ nor the apostles did. Abraham is referred to in the NT some 75 times. Semantic Bible Hyper Concordance

Yahweh, as Christ, came to fulfill the promises made to the fathers, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel. Luke 1:67-74. "I have not come but for the lost sheep of the house of Israel," Matthew 15:24.

Paul and the apostles then preached the gospel message of Yahweh keeping His promise of a New Covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah, writing His law upon the hearts of His People, Israel. Jeremiah 31:31-34.

Paul was the messenger to those Israelites that left Egypt prior to the Exodus w/Moses and the giving of the Law at Mt. Sinai. Paul was also the ambassador for Christ to those Israelites that did not return to Judah after the Assyrian and Babylonian captivities, but instead migrated north and west, around the Black Sea into Galatia, Macedonia and Corinth (Greece).

These Israelites, the Nations, are referred to by Paul as the "uncircumcised." Peter was accused, along with Barnabas, of hypocrisy because they would not eat with those of the Nations, for fear of what the Judaeans would think. This is the reason for the confrontation between Paul and Peter recorded in Galatians. 2:11-16. Paul goes on to explain that Israelites are not saved by the rituals of the law, that is, circumcision, but through faith in Yahshua Christ. Galatians 2:16.

Some Christians point to this passage to support throwing the entire Old Testament Mosaic Law out the window. "We're not under law, but under grace. The Old Testament was Law, the New Testament is Grace." However, Paul is not talking about the entire OT Law in Ga. 2, only the rituals of that law, one of which was circumcision. Christ Himself told us what to think when it came to the Law. He said:  Think NOT, that I came to destroy the Law or the prophets. I did not come to destroy, but to fulfill. Matthew 5:17. How much plainer can it be said? Then why do so many think that the entire law was abolished, destroyed, done away with, in direct contradiction to what Christ said?   

More confusion results when readers don't know that Gentile is a Latin word, and should not be in an English translation of the bible. Ethnos is the original Greek word Paul used in Galatians 2:12 and 14 and should be translated Nations, as in Israelite Nations, not Gentiles, or "non-jews," as the judeo-christian cultists like Chuck Baldwin would have us believe.

Yahweh did the choosing of His People, the Israelites, "before the foundation of the world." Ephesians 1:3 There are no other people, no other family, no other tribe of people thus called. "Ye ONLY have I known of all the families of the earth;"  Amos 3:2

There are those who like to say everything changed after the cross, after the resurrection. Those same people will proclaim "God doesn't change; He is the same yesterday, today and forever," but throw that teaching out the window when confronted with passages that clearly state that it was to the Israelites, and the Israelites only, that Christ came.

Readers of Scripture need to cease from bringing preconceived ideas into Scripture. Instead, they need to use exegesis to understand what the passages under study say, and then form their understanding of what Scripture teaches, not the other way around.

Stop trying to put God into a box of your making.


Sunday, February 24, 2013

Why No Moffatt or Fenton Translations?

The James Moffat and the Ferrar Fenton translations of the bible, out of the dozens available, quite often most accurately translate the meaning of the text as found in the original languages, the Hebrew and the Greek. However, neither are ever included in any of the websites (that I am aware of) that provide multiply translations.

There is the 21st Century King James Version, the Complete English Bible, Contemporary English Version, Easy-to-Read Version, Living Bible, Good News Version, etc., all meant, in my view, to teach the reader universalism and that the jews are "Gods' Chosen." (How long before there is a Fornicator's Bible made available?)

To confirm this fact for yourself, simple go to Biblegateway.com which has 45 English translations of the bible, some with several editions or the BlueLetterBible.org site with 18 English translations, but neither site has the Moffat or the Fenton.

Could it be that someone reading / studying either the Moffat or Fenton translation just might begin to understand that the jews are not "God's Chosen?" That "judeo-christianity" is an oxymoron?

That the 12 Tribes of Israel are the kinsmen who the Kinsman Redeemer redeemed?

And God forbid! that the Anglo-Saxon-Scandinavian-Celtic-Germanic and kindred peoples are the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel? And that it was these very peoples, the lost sheep of the house of Israel, and not the Chinese, or the Koreans, or the Aborigines of Australia, that Paul and the other apostles were sent to share the gospel with, that is, the good news that the Kinsman Redeemer had come to fulfill the promises made to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel and to them alone?


Monday, February 18, 2013

The Last Shall Be First

My experience has been that no matter how friendly I am, no matter how circumspect I am with presenting aspects of my Waltenschauung with others, if there is no almost immediate agreement, they are the party to separate, to exclude or cut off their communication. [separate: aphorizo - to set off by boundary, limit, exclude]

Speak is a verb, an action word. I am commanded to "speak (what you believe to be) the truth with love." Ephesians 4:15 For simply doing what we are commanded to do, (see verses 11-14) there is erected, by them, a boundary between us.

For this we should be glad.

"Blessed are you when men hate you and when they separate from you and they reproach and they cast out your name as evil because of the Son of Man. Rejoice in that day and leap for joy; for, behold your reward is great in heaven; for in the like manner did their fathers unto the prophets."

This response is nothing new. The prophets were separated from - and stone - since the beginning. This response is in fact, quite common. And to be expected.

Repent ( metanoeĆ³) is also a verb meaning to "re-think." Few there are who are willing to re-think their thinking, rethink their understanding, change their mind and to turn in another direction once they realize they were in error. What matters is: are we are doing our will, what we think we should be doing, or the will of our Father, which is in heaven?

Rewards are not handed out to everyone who believes they deserve one: but to those who do the Father's will. 2
1 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that does the will of my Father which is in heaven. 22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? 23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity. (Matthew 7)

These people think they are doing "many wonderful works," when in fact, they are "workers of iniquity." "The first shall be last, and the last shall be first."

Those who we least expect may just be those who rise to the top step in "that day."


Saturday, February 16, 2013

Whose Nation Are These United States, Anyway?

This missive is written with the experiences of having lived outside of these United States for almost 13 years.

I’ve lived in four different countries and traveled in over 25.

For several months I was the manager of the largest hotel on Corn Island, Nicaragua, on the Caribbean Sea. While there I worked with the Mestizo / Caribbean blacks and dealt every day with the native Nicaraguans and travelers from all over the world.

I lived six years in Thailand, working with the most educated Thai people.

I lived and worked in Qatar for several months, interacting with Muslims from Iran, South Africa, Iraq, the UAE and many other parts of the world.

I lived five years in South Korea working with the most educated Koreans.

I didn’t just vacation in these countries, enjoying the best these nations had to offer. I lived and experienced day-to-day life living in a foreign culture, among non-Caucasians who do not think, act or believe like Caucasians think, act or believe.

In my 13 years abroad, I learned – contrary to what I had been led to believe – non-Caucasians are not like me. I learned that diversity was not a strength.

I have nothing against those people.

Do you know what? Wanting to live with and be around your own people – your own kind - I learned - is normal. Kind after kind.

While living abroad, I noticed something – people tend to congregate with their own kind. Caucasians would associate with fellow Caucasians and Asians with fellow Asians. Kind after kind.

Again, people wanting to be around their own kind, I came to realize, is normal.

Never once did I hear the Koreans say: “Gee, we just don’t have enough non-Koreans here, not enough Filipinos, not enough Indonesian, not enough Japanese. We need to allow more non-Koreans in. After all, diversity is our strength.”

Which brings us to the question: Whose Nation Are These United States, Anyway?

The answer, I believe, is found in the

Preamble - U.S. Constitution

We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Posterity means – from one progeny; from one common ancestry.

Our Northern European ancestors were willing to lay down their lives to give us what became the greatest nation in man’s history.

Sadly, we are losing it, without a whimper.

We can see from the Ted Kennedy quote below that there was concern that the ethnic mix of our country would change if the 1965 Immigration Act passed.

"First, our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same.... Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset.... Contrary to the charges in some quarters, [the bill] will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area, or the most populated and deprived nations of Africa and Asia.... In the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the proposed measure is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to think." Ted Kennedy, chief Senate sponsor of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965.[28] (U.S. Senate, Subcommittee on Immigration and Naturalization of the Committee on the Judiciary, Washington, D.C., Feb. 10, 1965. pp. 1–3.)

Despite what traitor Ted had to say,

Since 1965 our cities have been flooded with millions of non-Caucasian immigrants annually.
Since 1965 the level of immigration has changed substantially.
Since 1965, the ethnic mix of our country has been upset.
Since 1965, America has been inundated with immigrants from the most populated and deprived nations of Africa, Asia and Central America.

At current immigration levels, our children and their children will be minorities in our own nation by 2050.

Some of you may be thinking: “Oh, it’s racist to think like you do.”

I understand that thinking.

We Caucasians, worldwide, have been programmed to think that way. That is why we Caucasians stand by and do nothing while our nations – Germany, France, Sweden, the UK - are invaded by non-Caucasians.

Quite often, living outside the US was not easy. I’ve learned my lesson the hard way.

I’m here to tell you what I learned:

Being “racist” is normal. To want to be around your own people is normal.

To want to preserve your country for your own kind, is normal. Kind after kind.

Most non-Caucasians preserve their nations, their way of life, for their own people. To do so is normal.

For me, the answer to the question, Whose nation are these United States, anyway?

Is - it is our nation.

Despite what we have been led to believe, it is normal - it is natural - to want to keep it that way.


Latin "Gentile" or Greek "Nation?"

Shortly after relocating to a new town, I discovered a local 6 a.m. Saturday morning bible study. The small gathering was led by a man who also led a prison ministry some four hours drive away. He was quick to let me know that in the 18 years he had been leading the prison ministry and driving to and fro all those years, that he never had to cancel a meeting because of illness, car trouble or weather. Obviously, God had been guiding and overseeing that ministry all those years, right?

During the third meeting of this study group composed mostly of elderly men, we were looking at 2 Timothy 1. As is my lifelong custom, I was prepared for the study by having studied the passage in the week leading up to the gathering. One of the other members initiated the early morning discussion by relating how he had picked up a woman he saw walking on the side of the road. He discovered she was on the way to the pharmacy to purchase medicine for her child. The problem was, she didn't have the money and didn't yet know how she was going to pay for what she needed to help alleviate her child's ailment. The man, with watery eyes, went on telling his story of how the Lord used this women's faith to reach his conscience. He related how the Lord moved him, despite his own the lack of funds, to supply her needs.

With that as the take-of point, the leader of the group went on for several minutes praising this bible study member for using his gifts of mercy and giving to help another. He brought us to the well known passages in I Corinthians 12; how we all have differing gifts, and even if we are only the little finger on one hand, God can and will use us to meet the needs of other members of the body of Christ.

We then moved on to read and discuss 2 Timothy 1. When we reached verse 11: "Unto which I am appointed a preacher and an apostle and a teacher of the Gentiles," I asked, being the newest member of the group not wanting to impose, if I could comment? The bible study and prison ministry leader spoke up and said, "Sure, we encourage participation. What do you have to contribute?" I said that the word Gentile is a Latin word and should not be in the verse, or any other verse in the New Testament. The Greek word used by Paul here was ethnos, and means nation, and should be translated nations, not Gentile, which has come to mean "non-jew."

Saying those words was like I had passed the worst gas imaginable. No, it was worse than that, I had committed blasphemy; I had questioned the King James Version of the bible, which I was soon to be told, in no uncertain terms, was THE inspired word of God. How dare I suggest that there was an error in the translation that has brought salvation to so many millions of Christians down through the ages?

I went on to explain, which I knew, from many similar experiences, was going to be a futile attempt, that a misunderstanding of the word ethnos, as Gentile, and not nation or nations, would lead the bible student to numerous errors of interpretation, errors that would cause nothing but confusion in trying to understand what Scripture teaches concerning who Paul is trying to reach when he uses the word ethnos. He is not talking about non-jews, he is talking about fellow Israelites.

Boy, did that set off the fireworks of indignation. The leader starting defending the authorized King James Version as being used by God to save countless souls for hundreds of years. He even raised his KJV translation in his left hand and declared: THIS is the inspired word of God! "The original Hebrew and Greek scriptures are the inspired word of God, not the multitude of translations," I replied. "Were those tablets Moses took down the mountain written in the KFV?

More indignation, this time from the man who had the gift of mercy and compassion not more than ten minutes earlier. He spoke up, his anger barely contained. "You're pissing me off, and you don't want to piss me off," he said, as he rose from his chair and walked away from the table to cool off.

I then said to the rest of the group, "No more than 10 minutes ago you all were going on about how we each have a gift or gifts to be used for the edification of others. I've been told by many I have the gift of teaching. I'm simply exercising my gift when I tell you that the Latin word Gentile should not be used in an English translation of the bible because it causes confusion, even deception. How is it that the gift of mercy is quite acceptable, and is encouraged to be used for the benefit of the rest of the body, but the gift of teaching is not to be used and the teaching is not to be accepted? You haven't disagreed that the word Gentile is Latin, and the original is ethnos, which means nation. So, what is the problem?"

The "leader" then asked, "What does this have to do with the saving of souls for Christ?"

I said, "Once one understands who Paul is speaking to, and who the gospel is for, it makes all the difference in the kingdom."

The leader then raised his KJV of the bible into the air and proclaimed with a loud voice: "THIS IS THE INSPIRED WORD OF GOD! It has been used by God to save millions of souls, including mine and everyone here in this room."

By this time, I had made my point. By this time I knew I would be wasting time and my breath. I closed my bible, which just happens to be a Scofield Reference Bible, by which I had been deceived by for most of my life, told the group good morning, and walked out.

No doubt I had created quite a stir, upsetting that group of righteous Judeo-Christians who then most likely spent the rest of the meeting despising me and what I had to say. Luke 23:11.

The saddest aspect of this episode is that this same scene could be repeated in Judeo-Christian-zionist congregations in all white nations today. No one caring that they are being deceived. No one questioning the status quo. No one daring to think other than what most of their small group of narrow-minded brainwashed fellow pew-sitters think, as they sit listening week after week to flat stone teaching. No one reflecting on what was just said and asking themselves "Gee, what if he is right? What if God sent that man to our little group to wake us up and we didn't listen?"

"He that hath an ear to hear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches." Revelation 3:22 KJV

Note: Some readers may be asking How is translating ethnos as Gentiles rather than nations causing confusion? The reason is most Judeo-Christians, an oxymoron, believe Christ came to save the jews not non-jews, i.e., the Gentiles. The reality is, in Christ's own words, "I have not come but to the lost sheep of the house of Israel." The house of Israel are the descendants of the 12 Tribes of Israel, not to be confused with jews. The 12 Tribes were and are the Anglo-Saxon-Scandinavian-Celtic-Germanic and kindred peoples. These tribes were scattered about the known world during the time of the apostles. The White race was the scattered "strangers of I Peter 1, the elect race of I Peter 2:9 and the twelve tribes scattered abroad of James 1:1.

The Blue Letter Bible has even gone so far, to continue the deception, to alter the meanings used in the online version of Strong's Concordance. Many many instances can be found where additional meanings have been added to Strong's Lexicon. Don't confuse the jew who reside in Palestine today with the Israelites of the Old and New Covenants.