I Thessalonians 5:20, 21

Do not despise expounding of scripture, but scrutinize all things. Hold fast that which is right.

Malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium

- I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery.


See also Kerux Replies at Wordpress.com where all future missives will also be posted.

However, because Wordpress charges an outrageous $59.95 a year for a video upload upgrade, videos will only be linked, not embedded.

Monday, May 31, 2010

Sovereign State Depository™



The goal of Sovereign State Depository™ is to provide businesses and individuals with a safe, secure, and most importantly, a sound, stable, Constitutional monetary system based in gold and silver that will be electronically transferred from one account to the other.

We could kill the jewish controlled banking cabal with this idea. More to follow.



Tuesday, May 25, 2010

Jobs, Jobs, Jobs


Have you noticed the increasing government talk about creating jobs? In today's America, most people assume it is government's job to create jobs, jobs and more jobs. So, in sync with the political savvy most clever politicians have, they promise the people, jobs, jobs, jobs. However, no where in the US Constitution, the contract between We the People and their government, can there be found any clause where it spells out the government's role in creating jobs, jobs, jobs.

What we do see is government's responsibility to protect our God given unalienable right to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness," which was originally written as "the pursuit of property" but changed just before ratification. Here's what George Mason had to say about the pursuit of property:

That all men are by nature equally free and independent, and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity; namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.

Yes, We the People have the right to property, that is, we have the right to acquire - through our efforts - property, and then we have the right to hold on to that property. It is the government's main responsibility to provide the environment to do just that - legally acquire property and then keep what property is acquired. In fact, arguments can be made that securing our rights is the sole purpose of government; why the people created government in the first instance.

Instead, we have a government that is doing everything in it's power to destroy our ability to earn property, through small business endeavors, self-employment, contracts, hard work, in short, what it takes to acquire property, also known as working capital. Today, we find the tail wagging the dog, to death. Worse, if We the People are fortunate, through our efforts and despite the myriad of obstacles, hurdles and roadblocks government - at all levels - sets up to hinder our efforts, and do manage to succeed, government, at all levels, takes as much as it can through taxation. The tail wags the dog to death and yet sniffs around expecting to extract more taxes from the dead corpse.

In the place of opportunity, government offers the promise of jobs, jobs, jobs. In short, a job is nothing more than a way for corporations to keep most people on slave wages. True wealth is created through self-employment, small business endeavors, free market capitalism, not jobs, jobs, jobs.

One of my favorite sayings related to work is: "I'm so busy working, I can't make any money." I for one, don't want a job. I want an opportunity to create wealth for myself and my posterity and then to be able to keep what I create safe from government confiscation. This is at direct odds with what our government is doing today: they destroy those who create wealth - this is what happened to small business owners in California - and jobs, and then, once the destruction of wealth takes place, step up to the microphone and promise jobs, jobs, jobs. Any and all jobs which do happen to be created, of course, are created with the very funds government extracts from its citizens, through the heavily progressive income tax, the second plank of the Communist Manifesto. When government succeeds in confiscating our wealth, which it most certainly has, we all end up poor, which we are most certainly becoming.

To the government's repeated promise to provide jobs, jobs, jobs, I respond "take this promise of jobs, jobs, jobs and shove it."



Sunday, May 23, 2010

What We Are Not Being Told About the Gulf Oil Fiasco


From: James Wickstrom Blogspot


The estimated super high pressure release of oil from under the earth's crust is between 80,000 to 100,000 barrels per day. The flow of oil and toxic gases is bringing up with it... rocks and sand which causes the flow to create a sandblasting effect on the remaining well head device currently somewhat restricting the flow, as well as the drilled hole itself.

As the well head becomes worn it enlarges the passageway allowing an ever-increasing flow. Even if some device could be placed onto the existing wellhead, it would not be able to shut off the flow, because what remains of the existing wellhead would not be able to contain the pressure.

The well head piping is originally about 2 inches thick. It is now likely to be less than 1 inch thick, and thinning by each passing moment. The oil has now reached the Gulf Stream and is entering the Oceanic current which is at least four times stronger than the current in the Gulf, which will carry it throughout the world within 18 months..

The oil along with the gasses, including benzene and many other toxins, is deleting [sic] the oxygen in the water. This is killing all life in the ocean. Along with the oil along the shores, there will be many dead fish, etc. that will have to be gathered and disposed of.


At some point the drilled hole in the earth will enlarge itself beneath the wellhead to weaken the area the wellhead rests upon. The intense pressure will then push the wellhead off the hole allowing a direct unrestricted flow of oil, etc.. The hole will continue to increase in size allowing more and more oil to rise into the Gulf. After several billion barrels of oil have been released, the pressure within the massive cavity five miles beneath the ocean floor will begin to normalize.

This will allow the water, under the intense pressure at 1 mile deep, to be forced into the hole and the cavity where the oil was. The temperature at that depth is near 400 degrees, possibly more. The water will be vaporized and turned into steam, creating an enormous amount of force, lifting the Gulf floor. It is difficult to know how much water will go down to the core and therefore, its not possible to fully calculate the rise of the floor.

The tsunami wave this will create will be anywhere from 20 to 80 feet high, possibly more. Then the floor will fall into the now vacant chamber. This is how nature will seal the hole. Depending on the height of the tsunami, the ocean debris, oil, and existing structures that will be washed away on shore and inland, will leave the area from 50 to 200 miles inland devoid of life. Even if the debris is cleaned up, the contaminants that will be in the ground and water supply will prohibit re-population of these areas for an unknown number of years. [End of scientists information release]



JFK Was a "Conspiracy Theorist"


The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.

"For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.

Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed.

No President should fear public scrutinity of his program. For from that scrutiny comes understanding; and from that understanding comes support or opposition. And both are necessary. I am not asking your newspapers to support the Administration, but I am asking your help in the tremendous task of informing and alerting the American people. For I have complete confidence in the response and dedication of our citizens whenever they are fully informed.

I not only could not stifle controversy among your readers-- I welcome it. This Administration intends to be candid about its errors; for as a wise man once said: "An error does not become a mistake until you refuse to correct it." We intend to accept full responsibility for our errors; and we expect you to point them out when we miss them.

Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed-- and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy. And that is why our press was protected by the First (emphasized) Amendment-- the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution-- not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and sentimental, not to simply "give the public what it wants"--but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold educate and sometimes even anger public opinion.

This means greater coverage and analysis of international news-- for it is no longer far away and foreign but close at hand and local. It means greater attention to improved understanding of the news as well as improved transmission. And it means, finally, that government at all levels, must meet its obligation to provide you with the fullest possible information outside the narrowest limits of national security...

And so it is to the printing press--to the recorder of mans deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news-- that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help man will be what he was born to be: free and independent."

Does anyone dare call John F. Kennedy a "kook?" A "tinfoil hat nutter?" An "extremist?"

C'mon folks, this was the president of the United States saying these things way back in the early 1960s. Any wonder why he was assassinated, right in full view of the watching world? I remember exactly where I was that day. Sitting in front of the television set watching as the President was shot. That was a warning to all future presidents: "Step out of line and this is what can happen. Right in full view. We are that powerful."

That single event may well have been the turning point in American history. We have been fully controlled by the same group of conspirators who planned and carried out that assassination ever since.

And my educated guess is, the same group of criminals conspired together to execute 9/11.

These same criminals control the media, to which "we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help man will be what he was born to be: free and independent," and is a major reason we Americans are no longer free and independent.


Friday, May 21, 2010

“For What Reason Do You Speak in Parables to Them?”


Matthew 13:

1 The same day went Jesus out of the house, and sat by the sea side. 2 And great multitudes were gathered together unto him, so that he went into a ship, and sat ; and the whole multitude stood on the shore. 3 And he spake many things unto them in parables, saying , Behold , a sower went forth to sow ; 4 And when he sowed , some seeds fell by the way side, and the fowls came and devoured them up : 5 Some fell upon stony places, where they had not much earth: and forthwith they sprung up , because they had no deepness of earth: 6 And when the sun was up , they were scorched ; and because they had no root, they withered away . 7 And some fell among thorns; and the thorns sprung up , and choked them: 8 But other fell into good ground, and brought forth fruit, some an hundredfold , some sixtyfold , some thirtyfold. 9 Who hath ears to hear , let him hear . 10 And the disciples came , and said unto him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables? 11 He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given . 12 For whosoever hath , to him shall be given , and he shall have more abundance : but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath . 13 Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand . 14 And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Esaias, which saith , By hearing ye shall hear , and shall not understand ; and seeing ye shall see , and shall not perceive : 15 For this people's heart is waxed gross , and their ears are dull of hearing , and their eyes they have closed ; lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted , and I should heal them.

When reading the above passage, the first question that came to my mind was: If the gospel is universal, for "whosoever" and "anyone who believes," why did Christ say here in Matthew 13:11 "... it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given."

Let me rephrase what Christ said, so those of you who have a difficult time understanding English, may see the verse in a different light:

"What I have to say about the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven is for you. Keep in mind, I told you back in Matthew 10: 5 "You should not depart into the way of the heathens, and you should not enter into a city of Samaritans. 6 But rather you must go to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. 7 And going you proclaim, saying that ‘the kingdom of the heavens has neared!’ What I have to say is not for everyone, it is not for them. Because what I have to say about the mysteries is not for them, I speak to them in parables - to make sure they do not understand what I am saying. But to those of you who what I say is given to understand, I explain - in private - what the parables mean."

Right there in Matthew 13, Yahshua Christ plainly states what He had to say was not for them. Back in Matthew 10 He plainly commands the Twelve to not go to the "heathen" but rather go to the "lost [exiled] sheep of the house of Israel."

I actually had a universalist tell me that the command in Matthew 10, to not go to the heathens, was before the resurrection. After the resurrection, the command was to "Go ye, therefore and teach all nations ..." Matthew 28:19.

I said, "So, you believe Christ changed His entire plan?"

I pointed out his interpretation contradicted the above verses and perhaps what was meant in Matthew 28:19 was to go to all the nations and teach the "lost [exiled] sheep of the house of Israel" which would not contradict what Christ had said earlier. I pointed him to James' epistle, chapter one, verse one: "to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad." And to the entire book of Hebrews, which of course refers to the house of Israel. I further explained that the book of Hebrews was not written to the Mongolians, or the the Vietnamese or the Aborigines. What Christ had to say was not for them, but for the lost [exiled] sheep of the house of Israel, that is, the Hebrews, the "twelve tribes scattered abroad among the nations." I could have explained how all of Paul's epistles were written to the exiled sheep of the house of Israel, but if he did not understand the significance of James and Hebrews, he was not going to understand Paul's epistles either. Pearls and swine came to mind.

This Johnny-one-verser came back with another one-verse answer: "For God so loved the world, that He gave His unique son, that whosoever believes on Him, should not perish, but have eternal life."

To that I replied: in Luke 2:1 was the "whole world" expected to travel to Palestine to register for tax purposes? Did the Mongolians, the Chinese the Aborigines have to travel to Herod's kingdom to be taxed? Even he had to admit that the answer was "No." If the world in Luke 2:1 does not mean the whole world, then just perhaps the word "world" in John 3:16 does not mean the "whole world" but that of the Israelite world or "society" [another quite acceptable translation for the Greek word "kosmos."] See Matthew

Dear Christians: the Bible was written by Israelites, about Israelites, to Israelites and for Israelites. These Israelites are not to be confused with the so-called jews of today, who claim to be the Israelites of the Old Testament. They are not. They are the Edomite jews that Christ clearly states are "of [from] their father the devil" in John 8:44 and "are not of God" in verse 47.

"I am not come, save for the exiled sheep of the house of Israel."

For use of the term Gentile, see also: Misapplication of the Term Gentile


Wednesday, May 19, 2010

Gold Rush in China



Gold is money.


Tuesday, May 18, 2010

12 Tribes of Israel Connection With Japan


Important Japanese Gion festival is Zion. Omikoshi - Portable Shrine, is aka Solomon's Treasures. View both in the video below.

Link to video here: Zion Festival - Japan

Zionfestival by oniazuma

Many of the root words found in the Japanese language are virtually identical to many of the same words found in the Hebrew language. This fact is brought out quite convincingly and in detail in Eidelberg's book:

Biblical Hebrew Origin Japanese People/dp/9652293393

These facts may help to explain why the Japanese are the most "westernized" of all the Asian nations. Their origins are actually found in the Anglo-Saxon 12 Tribes of Israel, which, despite what is found in the video and the book, are not jewish, as many have been led to believe, but Israelite. The so-called jews are not the Israelites as found in the Old Testament.

Even the name "Japan" is believed to be derived from Japheth, one of the sons of Noah.


Muslim Immigrants: UK There Is No England Now



Monday, May 03, 2010

Reply to Comment Re: "Deadbeat Dad State and Child Support"

For some reason, the ability to post comments here is not working. That, and the expanded post option, stopped working both at the same time, for reasons unknown and I have not been able to troubleshoot and fix either problem.

However, Rob sent in a comment on May 3, 2010 to my blog post The Deadbeat Dad State and Child Support which I would like to reply to.

Thanks much Rob for your comments, which were:

This was clearly written not long after a divorce... Even making allowances for cynicism, though, it's a pretty wide stretch to say (a) that the biological father is not obligated to pay child support for his children, (b) that women can't provide for their children, and (c) that this has anything to do with our "Jewish-controlled government."

Well, no Rob, this post was not made "not long after a divorce." The divorce in question happened 12 or 13 years earlier.

No where in the post did I say that "the biological father is not obligated to pay child support for his children." What I did say, and do believe is, no father should be obligated to pay child support for children that the State took away for no reason, even for visitation: or when the mother prevents the children from seeing their father, and the father their children, with the approbation of the State family legal system. Anyone with two working braincells should be able to see that a father has the right - "the pursuit of happiness" - to be an important part of his children's lives, especially if he is being forced to provide support to the mother, for their care.

In my case, I offered and should have been granted dual custody and therefore would not have been obligated for any child support, which, in my opinion, is a euphemism, for extortion. The courts remove the children from the father and then, by threat of force, demand that he pay the mother support, even though she refuses to allow even visitation. That activity is what is known in the criminal world as racketeering.

Further, I never said all mothers can not provide for their children. Some can, some can't. In my case, the mother could not. I could. That alone used to be reason enough to let the "children follow the condition of the father." It should have been reason enough in my case. It wasn't. No reasons given.

And lastly, anyone familiar with the history of "no-fault divorce" which is in actuality, "his-fault divorce," knows full well that the Jewish dominated feminist movement of the 1960s and '70s was fully behind the separating of children from their fathers and still is. I was a Court Appointed Special Advocate and know from first-hand experience how the system works to separate fathers from their children simply because their mother seeks a divorce, even, as in my case, for "un-reconcilable differences," which so often simply means that the mother can't have her way 100% of the time.

Kevin MacDonald has documented fully and in detail how Jewish influence in American society has been detrimental to our culture. I recommend his book, The Culture of Critique, for anyone interested in further details.

For anyone interested in more information on how this scam works, I refer you to my book, Deadbeat Dad, found at Deadbeat Dad where I go into great detail, documenting how the Family Law system destroys families.

I know, because it happened to mine.