I Thessalonians 5:20, 21

Do not despise expounding of scripture, but scrutinize all things. Hold fast that which is right.

Malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium

- I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery.

____________________________________________

See also Kerux Replies at Wordpress.com where all future missives will also be posted.

However, because Wordpress charges an outrageous $59.95 a year for a video upload upgrade, videos will only be linked, not embedded.
___


Wednesday, June 18, 2008

The Crash Cometh

Even the mainstream bankers are now starting to ring the warning bells - belatedly warning the rest of us of the coming economic crash.


The Royal Bank of Scotland has advised clients to brace for a full-fledged crash in global stock and credit markets over the next three months as inflation paralyses the major central banks.
"A very nasty period is soon to be upon us - be prepared," said Bob Janjuah, the bank's credit strategist.

Royal Bank of Scotland

"The Fed is in panic mode. The massive credibility chasms down which the Fed and maybe even the ECB will plummet when they fail to hike rates in the face of higher inflation will combine to give us a big sell-off in risky assets," he said.

Did you get that? A mainstream bank official said publicly that the Jewish controlled Federal Reserve is in "panic mode."

Many non-Jewish bank and financial institutional economists have been warning of a financial and economic collapse for some time, including Robert Chapman of the
International Forecaster

Ron Paul on the Economic Collapse


Peter Schiff, Jim Rogers and Mohammad Rafeeq has had numerous on line conversations of the coming economic peril that awaits us for some time now, at least going back to October 2007.
The French Connection

Read More...

Sunday, June 15, 2008

Another Contradiction

"Get Osama Bin Laden before I leave office," orders George W Bush

President George W Bush has enlisted British special forces in a final attempt to
capture Osama Bin Laden before he leaves the White House.

Why?

If he [Bush] can say he has killed Saddam Hussein and captured Bin Laden, he can claim to have left the world a safer place,” said a US intelligence source.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article4138791.ece

There's only one problem with what Bush wants -


the FBI has plainly stated that the have "no hard evidence that links Usama bin Laden with 9/11."

Yep, it's true.

Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI. When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden’s Most Wanted web page, Tomb said, “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.

Muckraker Report


laden

There is also no mention of bin Laden being wanted for 9/11 on the FBI Most Wanted List.

FBI Most Wanted

If Bush really wants to make the world safer, he should lock not only himself, but Cheney and all the Jewish | Zionists on his staff and in government positions, starting with the rabid Zionist Michael Chertoff, up.

Michael+Chertoff

This criminal is more dangerous to Americans and the world at large than bin Laden ever was or will be.

It was Chertoff, who, as assistant US Attorney General, let at least 120 Israelis 'art students' suspected by the FBI and the DEA of possible involvement in 9/11, out of the US within days of the event.
art_students_DEA
No explanation for Chertoff's outrageous act has ever been given.

Maybe it's time there was an explanation given, just before we hang this criminal. If Chertoff doesn't talk, we should water board him until he does.

And then there is the allegation that Bush 'killed Saddam Hussein" and that Hussein's death somehow made the world a safer place. For who? Certainly not the thousands of Iraqis that have died since Bush invaded Iraq and destroyed the lives of countless other Iraqis that now have to live among a war torn country enduring a war that looks like it may never end.

What fantasy world does Bush live in anyway? He exhibits every characteristic of a psychopath: one who can not admit his wrongs or mistakes; has no empathy for those who suffer; takes no responsibility for his own behavior while controlling and manipulating others, this time British special forces.

Can we possibly endure another eight months of this psychopathic maniac?

Read More...

Saturday, June 14, 2008

Science in the Bible

"All the rivers run into the sea; yet the sea is not full: unto the place from whence the rivers come, thither they return again." Ecclesiastes 1:7

Here the 'Preacher' states a scientific principle - evaporation - very clearly - 3000 years ago. Who says the Bible is not a scientific book?

Evaporation is the primary pathway that water moves from the liquid state back into the water cycle as atmospheric water vapor. Studies have shown that the oceans, seas, lakes, and rivers provide nearly 90 percent of the moisture in the atmosphere via evaporation......

The Water Cycle: Evaporation

wcmaindiagram2

For at least 3000 years rains has poured down upon the land, made its way to the rivers and the rivers have run into the seas, and yet the seas are not full. The Preacher knew about the water cycle 3000 years ago.

On average, the 48 continental United States receives enough precipitation in one year to cover the land to a depth of 30 inches. That works out to about 1,430 cubic miles of water, which would have a weight (at about 62.4 pounds per cubic foot) or about 6.6 billion tons. The United States is fortunate to be a country where ample rainfall occurs over much of the land area. Rain: A valuable resource

Let's take a look at the global warming propaganda being disseminated by the United States Geological Survey:

Global sea level and the Earth's climate are closely linked. The Earth's climate has warmed about 1°C (1.8°F) during the last 100 years. As the climate has warmed following the end of a recent cold period known as the "Little Ice Age" in the 19th century, sea level has been rising about 1 to 2 millimeters per year due to the reduction in volume of ice caps, ice fields, and mountain glaciers in addition to the thermal expansion of ocean water. If present trends continue, including an increase in global temperatures caused by increased greenhouse-gas emissions, many of the world's mountain glaciers will disappear. For example, at the current rate of melting, all glaciers will be gone from Glacier National Park, Montana, by the middle of the next century (fig. 1). In Iceland, about 11 percent of the island is covered by glaciers (mostly ice caps). If warming continues, Iceland's glaciers will decrease by 40 percent by 2100 and virtually disappear by 2200.

The USGS admits to a "Little Ice Age" in the 1800s, about one hundred fifty years ago. They then assert that since that time, the climate has warmed about 1°C (1.8°F). They then state that sea levels have been rising about 1 to 2 millimeters per year. How they ascertain this rise in sea level they don't say. How does one measure a rising sea level? One to two millimeters is an awful small rise to measure - one millimeter is 1/1000th of a meter - about the thickness of a credit card. Even if present trends continue, at one millimeter per year, in 100 years sea levels would rise by 10 centimeters - about the size a woman's cervix dilates to before she is to push when she is about to deliver a baby. Where do they measure this rise? How do they measure this rise? They don't say. We are just expected to take their word that the sea level is rising and that a 10 centimeter rise in 100 years is something we should worry about. The Preacher, 3000 years ago, said otherwise.

The USGS goes on to predict that if present trends continue many of the world's mountain glaciers will disappear. There's the big IF - if present trends continue, - the outcome is pretty scary isn't it? "at the current rate of melting, all glaciers will be gone from Glacier National Park, Montana, by the middle of the next century." And "Iceland's glaziers will decrease by 40% by 2100." We must do something something about the "increased greenhouse-gas emissions" alleged to be the cause of the seas alleged rising.

However, those of us who read and believe what we read in Ecclesiastes 1:7, we know "All the rivers run into the sea; yet the sea is not full: unto the place from whence the rivers come, thither they return again," and the big IF hasn't happened for at least 3000 years.

"Oh," but you say, "what about green house gas emissions from our burning of fossil fuel?" It's up to you to prove to the rest of us that this slight climate change the USGS alleges takes place, is the result of man-made emissions and not caused naturally by the sun.

The Preacher did also say, "There is nothing new under the sun."

Read More...

Saturday, June 07, 2008

Judge Alan Jaroslovsky's Many Atrocities

________________________________
Judge Alan Jaroslovsky

"I have never,
in the 12 years I have been on the bench,
given a man back his business
over the objection of his ex-wife."

__________________________________________________
Judge Alan Jaroslovsky
US Federal Bankruptcy Judge
Santa Rosa | Eureka California


Is that so your Honor? The business wasn't yours in the first place, so how could you "give it back?" Do you think that for every man that comes before your elevated bench, seeking his right of protection of his assets guaranteed to him through the US Constitution, which you have sworn to uphold, you can decide whether or not to "give it back?" When did you earn the right to take it away? It certainly wasn't you who put in the blood, sweat and tears it takes to build up a business and it certainly wasn't you who risked your finances to fund his business. And it certainly wasn't you, who gets his generous salary every month, the salary paid for by men just like the men whose businesses you take away, who had the entrepreneurial skills it takes to build a business. You are beholden to the very men whose businesses you take away, not the other way around. Who do you think you are?


Why did you take it away? Because his wife objected? His wife says, "I object your Honor?" And you automatically reply, "Objection sustained?" Isn't that bias against men contrary to the oath of office you swore to uphold?

Federal judicial oaths


In the United States, federal judges are required to take not just one, but two oaths. The first oath is:


I, Alan Jaroslvsky, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as Federal Bankruptcy judge under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God. 28 USC 453


I've highlighted the part of the oath that you've admitted to violating for over 12 years. Quite a dishonorable thing for you to do, violate your oath of office so many times over so many years.

The second oath that federal judges must take is:

I, Alan Jaroslovsky, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God. 5 USC 3331


Aren't you violating the man's right to equal protection under the law as provided by the US Constitution when you "take away a man's business" simply because his ex-wife objects? Equal protection under the law is a fundamental component of the rule of law and ensures that all federal and state laws are applied to citizens of the United States equally, regardless of their race, religion, gender or minority status. Apparently, you have violated this fundamental component of the rule of law the entire 12 years you've been "on the bench."

In 12 years, of all the divorcing and bankrupt men who came before you "on the bench" and not one of them was allowed to maintain his business, if his ex-wife objected? You kept every single one of these men's livelihood - who just might have happened to be married to a vindictive wench - away from him? For what reason? Because his wife requested you ruin his life? Or did you take away his business based upon his wife's desire for revenge? The business he no doubt worked hard for, the business he needed to provide for his children - children that he quite likely lost to his wife in a divorce - the business he needed to provide for himself, not only for today but for the many tomorrows he will no doubt face as well? Simply because his ex-wife requested he not be allowed the federal protection he had every right to, you denied him that right? And by denying him his right of protection, you pushed that man toward destitution? Toward homelessness, toward perhaps even suicide?

And you are proud of the multitude of your atrocious decisions?

What gives you the right to deny federal protection of a man's assets and business based upon the whims of his ex-wife?

You're not 'on the bench' to serve the interests of the feminists that you obviously cater to. You've been appointed to the bench to administer the US Federal Bankruptcy laws, in a professional and non-biased manner - "without respect of persons" - not the dictates of women diseased with misandry.

Do you have any idea how many lives of decent men you've ruined? How many families have been wreaked because of your actions? You've been on the federal bench since January 1987. That's 21 years you've been screwing men out of their right to federal protection of their assets and livelihood. My guess is, over a 21 year period of time, the men and lives you've ruined runs into the several hundred.

You are a disgrace to the American judicial system. You are a tyrant. You don't deserve your position of trust, your position 'on the bench,' doing the bidding of disgruntled ex-wives, simply to pander to the politically correct feminist crowd way too many of you political appointees are beholden to.
_________________________________________________

Apparently, others agree.
Courthouse Forum

Read More...

International Jews Moving into South Korea

Events are unfolding in South Korea along the familiar lines of the dictates of globalization, to allow the world’s wealthiest and powerful to gain control of the basic necessities the rest of us serfs | slaves need for survival. This is exactly how the IMF and the World Bank controllers gain control of a country. They make usury loans with onerous conditions to the target nation state - and get an elected leader - or a puppet government in office - to then start privatizing – oil, gas and electrical production, water supply and other vital infrastructure and health care – all basic human needs - so the wealthy can control the basics and then squeeze the rest of the population until they cry uncle.

We see this over and over and over. That's what happened to Russia after the collapse of the Berlin Wall under the Western puppet Boris Nikolayevich Yeltsin -

"Much of the I.M.F.'s initial $2.5 billion in loans was delivered almost immediately after Mr. Yeltsin won a referendum on his presidency in April 1993 and started speeding up the privatization of the Russian economy."

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B05E3DF1339F931A35751C0A962958260

- who allowed the Jewish oligarchs to pillage privatized Russian resources and the Russian people, that is until Putin. That is why the Jewish controlled international press takes every opportunity to vilify Putin - he's taken Russian resources back and out of the hands of the Jewish oligarchs such as Mikhail Khodorkovsky of Yukos Oil infamy, Roman Abramovich of Sibneft Oil and Boris Berezovsky.

Lets move over to South America - to Venezuela and Hugo Chavez. After paying off his nation's debt, ahead of schedule, to the Jewish controlled IMF, Chavez nationalized the oil industry and is doing what he can for the people of Venezuela - albeit not perfect by any means, he's certainly not kowtowing to the New World Order.

http://tinyurl.com/s45yw

Because of Chavez's refusal to bend the knee or wear the yarmulke and visit the wailing wall, the Jewish controlled international media has constantly and unrelentingly attacked Chavez, including fomenting the coming war to be launched against him from neighboring Colombia and their puppet there, Uribe.

"We don't want war, but we will not allow the North American empire -- which is the master -- and its sub-President [Alvaro] Uribe and the Colombian oligarchy to divide, to weaken us. We will not allow it."

http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/americas/03/02/chavez.colombia/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7277313.stm

As we have seen in Kosovo, Afghanistan and Iraq, USrael will do whatever is necessary to gain control of a nation's oil supplies, including war. Venezuela will be no exception.

In Kosovo, sacrificing principles for oil

This time, in the case of South Korea, the move to control is not being made through loans or threats, but through stealth and deception. After all, USrael already has a military stronghold in South Korea with 28,500 military personnel stationed on the ground in over 35 military camps

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_Army_installations_in_South_Korea

and don't need to threaten war. They have other, much more clandestine means. Jewish interests have already made inroads into other areas of the Korean landscape - with the planned building of not one, not two, but three theme parks - by Paramount, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer and Time Warner - all Jewish controlled - in and around Seoul. Next, will be a takeover of the TV and movie industry, to control public opinion and the destruction - there is virtually no pornography and little homosexuality - of the conservative Korean culture. They won't care if they make money or not - they think and plan long term and seek power | control. The money will come later. Lots of it.

The next power clutching move by these international financial vultures will be the take over of the Korean banking system; it's already started with the approval of Min Yoo-Seung, a protege of the Wall Street bankers, as the first non-governmental Governor of the Development Bank of Korea. That appointment couples nicely with the Jewish usurers buying into local banks, Kookman, Korean Exchange Bank and the previously established Citibank. That's their nose in the tent. Before the Koreans know it, these Jewish finance professionals will be in the tent and the rest of the Koreans will be out in the elements paying exorbitant banking fees - similar to those in the UK and the US - to access their own funds.

Pres. Lee Pledges to Elevate [sic] Financial Industry

President Lee Myung-bak on Wednesday promised to dedicate himself to improving the competitiveness of Korea's financial industry, establishing an advanced [sic] financial system and training professional finance workers by opening up, merging and privatizing corporations.

Lee also promised to end the "outmoded" government control over finance and ease the ban on conglomerates from owning more than a 4 percent stake in banks in order to bring the nation in line with global financial standards.

http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200804/200804170014.html
____________________________________________

Among the biggest beneficiaries are foreigners, who have snapped up bank shares via portfolio and direct investments. Three of the top four banks -- Woori is the exception -- are now majority-owned by foreigners, although they are run day-to-day by local managers.

In one recent foray, Goldman, Sachs & Co. (GS ) announced on Oct. 3 plans to invest up to $550 million for a 9.4% stake in the holding company that controls No. 4 lender Hana Bank. That comes after Goldman more than doubled a $538 million investment in Kookmin dating from 1999, when it sold an 8.96% stake to a large group of institutional investors in 2002 and 2003. Its latest bet comes after Standard Chartered PLC (SCBFF ) bought Korea First Bank for $3.3 billion earlier this year.


http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/10/03/bloomberg/sxhana.php

_____________________________

South Korea's financial watchdog unveiled a timetable yesterday to privatize the state-run Korea Development Bank (KDB) by 2012, in line with President Lee Myung-Bak's plans to revitalise the economy.

The Financial Services Commission (FSC) said it would put the lender and its affiliates under a holding company and establish a policy financing agency by December.

It said the government would list the holding company on the local stock market next year and sell a 49 percent stake in the lender by 2012 to local and foreign investors.

FSC chairman Jun Kwang-Woo said the watchdog would turn KDB into a global player by allowing it to acquire other financial companies.

"In KDB's privatization, we will keep the door open for mergers and acquisitions," he told reporters.

Min Yoo-Seung, head of [Jewish] Lehman Brothers Holdings's Seoul branch, was appointed Monday as KDB's new governor.


http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200803/200803200016.html

______________________________________________

With access to banking records, Jewish interests are privy to inside information from which they then make more wealth and gain more control and power.

Asia is the last stronghold against the London / Wall Street Jewish bankers. These International Jewish financial moguls have brought the world's entire financial system to the precipice of collapse. President Lee Myung-bak has pledged to allow these same greedy power hungry vultures to do the same in South Korea.

I'm rooting for the Koreans and thereby the rest of us. But, given history, it doesn't look promising.

Read More...