This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. 2 Timothy 3:1
Perilous - hard to take, hard to bear, troublesome, dangerous.
"2 For men shall be lovers of their own selves ...."
So many "resist the truth." So many are set against the truth, so many are opposed to the truth. (v. 8) They simply refuse to accept the truth.
We live in perilous times, yes? This morning, once again, I am weary of hearing of the troubling news, the problems, the evil all around us. Haughty, pride filled traitors in charge. (v.4)
What is the "secret" of surviving during these trouble filled times?
v. 16: All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for education in righteousness:
17 That the man of Yahweh may be perfect, (mature) thoroughly furnished unto all good works.
Spend time in Scripture - reading, educating yourself, soaking in the Word of Yahweh. Soak in Yahweh's truth. More importantly, believe His Word, by making His Word your "course of life" by living it day-by-day.
I Thessalonians 5:20, 21
Malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium
- I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery.
See also Kerux Replies at Wordpress.com where all future missives will also be posted.
However, because Wordpress charges an outrageous $59.95 a year for a video upload upgrade, videos will only be linked, not embedded.
Monday, May 13, 2013
This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. 2 Timothy 3:1
Friday, May 10, 2013
Basically, two types of people exist: the Givers and Takers. You can usually spot a Taker because once a Taker realizes they can no longer take from you, you never hear from them again. They take as much and for as long as they can, and then forget about you. They don't contact you to see how you're doing, because they don't care how you're doing; they only seem to "care" about you when they think they can, in one way or another, get more from you.
Takers don't usually prosper, because a person who sows sparingly also reaps sparingly.
In contrast, a Giver doesn't want anything from others; a Giver simply wants to give - because a Giver knows there is more blessing in giving than receiving. (Acts 20:35) A Giver will contact you to see how you're doing, simply because a Giver actually does care about you, and not for what they can get from you.
A Giver is usually prosperous in many ways: cheerful, content, not selfish, has a positive attitude, is outward focused and generally a good person to be around. A Giver is a good person to have as a friend.
Which are you: A Taker or a Giver?
Sunday, March 24, 2013
Let’s examine Scripture together, shall we?
Who are these sheep? The Israelites of the 12 Tribes of Israel.
31 When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory:32 And before him shall be gathered all nations: (ethnos) and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats:33 And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left.34 Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world:35 For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in:36 Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me.
He shall set the sheep – the members of the 12 Tribes of Israel – on His right hand, and all the other people, the goats, on his left hand.
THAT is what Scripture says. Whether you like it or not, whether you believe it or not, whether or not that is not what most people believe makes NO difference: THAT is what Scripture says and the entire context of Scriptures gives witness to this fact.
It doesn’t matter what Jerry Falwell taught; it doesn’t matter if Pat Robertson teaches another gospel, it doesn’t matter if John Hagee doesn’t agree, and it doesn’t matter that the Scofield Reference Bible teaches doctrine completely contrary to the evidence laid out within this missive.
What matters is, “what saith the Scripture?”
Tuesday, March 19, 2013
Far too many White nationalists, Odinists and other Nordic pagans simply can not accept the fact that the earliest Greeks and Romans were in reality Israelites, of the 12 Tribes of Israel, not to be confused with the jews. Hebrews were not jews; they were Israelites. See Was Abraham or Moses a Jew?
The jews have been able to deceive unwitting Christians, who believe the jews are "God's Chosen" and those, like the White nationalists, who do not accept Scripture as the Word of God because they believe it is a "jewish book." The bible is an Israelite book; written by Israelites, about Israelites, for Israelites and to Israelites and no other peoples. The jews have these Judeo-Christians and White nationalists believing the jews are the Israelites of the Old Testament and therefore these White nationalists, understandably, want nothing to do with the bible. This is unfortunate, as the bible is anything but a jewish book. It is a racial book, a "White nationalist" book from cover to cover.
Many of the earliest "Greeks" were with Joseph in Egypt. The historian Diodorus Siculus stated in his Library of History that the Athenians came from "Sais in Egypt." Sais was the area where Goshen was, in the Nile Delta, one of the most fertile areas of Egypt, where the Jacob/Israel family settled while Joseph was #2 in all of Egypt. From there they sailed and traded/migrated throughout the Med. Sea / Levant region.
The 12 Tribes were in the Goshen/Sais area for 215 years before Moses led the others out of Egypt into Palestine. During that extended time period, and before "there arose a new king that knew not Joseph," the "children of Israel were fruitful, and increased abundantly and multiplied and became exceedingly mighty, and the land was filled with them." Ex. 1:6,7.
"They say also that those who set forth with Danaus, likewise from Egypt, settled what is practically the oldest city of Greece, Argos, and that the nations of the Colchi in Pontus and that of the Jews, (sic - Israelites) which lies between Arabia and Syria, were founded as colonies by certain emigrants from their country . . ." (Diodorus, Bk. I, xxviii, 1-5).
Early Danites fled Egypt at the time just prior to the Exodus, and migrated through SarDINia, and left their trail along the sea-coasts of the Mediterranean. Thus Dan, who was a "lion's whelp" who would "leap from Bashan," leaped all the way to Ireland, where historians explain that the early settlers were known as the "Tuatha de Danaan" -- literally, the "tribe of Dan." The Greeks called them the Danoi, the Romans called them Danaus.
Israelites, for the most part, founded Greece and Rome and many other areas, including the Iberian (Hebrew) Peninsula. Israelite traders sailed through the Straits of Gibraltar, up the western coast of Iberia, all the way to the British Isles, which was referred to in Scripture as "the ends of the earth." It was these Israelite/Hebrew/Phoenician traders who most likely started the rumor/myth that the world was flat, to protect their trade monopoly.
Evidence shows that these traders may have sailed as far away as the Great Lake region - Upper Michigan - in North America, in search of tin. (See Barry Feld's America B.C.) As early as 1500 years before Christ, Hebrew/Israelite traders had ships large enough to haul cargo back to the Mediterranean Sea area. It was from this trade that Joseph of Arimathea, great uncle of Jesus Christ, made his wealth trading with the Roman empire this metal for their weapons and other goods.
Paul mentions to the Romans, (fellow Israelites) that "the Yahweh of peace shall crush the Adversary under your feet shortly" in Romans 16:20. The Romans were of the Tribe of Judah.
White nationalists may not like or accept what the Scripture, archaeology and history states about the earliest history of the White race. They may resist, fight and even reject what the evidence clearly indicates, but their reasons for rejecting these facts are based upon reasons other than what can be found in the historical record or Scripture.
Perhaps these White nationalists want to be able to live their lives just like the early Israelite pagans did, before they heard the gospel of the Kingdom God preached to them by the apostles who were sent out to the "lost sheep of the house of Israel."
Sunday, March 03, 2013
The only people I can find that Yahweh (God does have a name) made the promise of preservation to was the physical seed i.e., descendants, of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel. Genesis 15:5; 17:2-8;22: 15-18; 26:3-5.
Christians today like to separate the OT from the NT, something neither Christ nor the apostles did. Abraham is referred to in the NT some 75 times. Semantic Bible Hyper Concordance
Yahweh, as Christ, came to fulfill the promises made to the fathers, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel. Luke 1:67-74. "I have not come but for the lost sheep of the house of Israel," Matthew 15:24.
Paul and the apostles then preached the gospel message of Yahweh keeping His promise of a New Covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah, writing His law upon the hearts of His People, Israel. Jeremiah 31:31-34.
Paul was the messenger to those Israelites that left Egypt prior to the Exodus w/Moses and the giving of the Law at Mt. Sinai. Paul was also the ambassador for Christ to those Israelites that did not return to Judah after the Assyrian and Babylonian captivities, but instead migrated north and west, around the Black Sea into Galatia, Macedonia and Corinth (Greece).
These Israelites, the Nations, are referred to by Paul as the "uncircumcised." Peter was accused, along with Barnabas, of hypocrisy because they would not eat with those of the Nations, for fear of what the Judaeans would think. This is the reason for the confrontation between Paul and Peter recorded in Galatians. 2:11-16. Paul goes on to explain that Israelites are not saved by the rituals of the law, that is, circumcision, but through faith in Yahshua Christ. Galatians 2:16.
Some Christians point to this passage to support throwing the entire Old Testament Mosaic Law out the window. "We're not under law, but under grace. The Old Testament was Law, the New Testament is Grace." However, Paul is not talking about the entire OT Law in Ga. 2, only the rituals of that law, one of which was circumcision. Christ Himself told us what to think when it came to the Law. He said: Think NOT, that I came to destroy the Law or the prophets. I did not come to destroy, but to fulfill. Matthew 5:17. How much plainer can it be said? Then why do so many think that the entire law was abolished, destroyed, done away with, in direct contradiction to what Christ said?
More confusion results when readers don't know that Gentile is a Latin word, and should not be in an English translation of the bible. Ethnos is the original Greek word Paul used in Galatians 2:12 and 14 and should be translated Nations, as in Israelite Nations, not Gentiles, or "non-jews," as the judeo-christian cultists like Chuck Baldwin would have us believe.
Yahweh did the choosing of His People, the Israelites, "before the foundation of the world." Ephesians 1:3 There are no other people, no other family, no other tribe of people thus called. "Ye ONLY have I known of all the families of the earth;" Amos 3:2
There are those who like to say everything changed after the cross, after the resurrection. Those same people will proclaim "God doesn't change; He is the same yesterday, today and forever," but throw that teaching out the window when confronted with passages that clearly state that it was to the Israelites, and the Israelites only, that Christ came.
Readers of Scripture need to cease from bringing preconceived ideas into Scripture. Instead, they need to use exegesis to understand what the passages under study say, and then form their understanding of what Scripture teaches, not the other way around.
Stop trying to put God into a box of your making.
Sunday, February 24, 2013
The James Moffat and the Ferrar Fenton translations of the bible, out of the dozens available, quite often most accurately translate the meaning of the text as found in the original languages, the Hebrew and the Greek. However, neither are ever included in any of the websites (that I am aware of) that provide multiply translations.
There is the 21st Century King James Version, the Complete English Bible, Contemporary English Version, Easy-to-Read Version, Living Bible, Good News Version, etc., all meant, in my view, to teach the reader universalism and that the jews are "Gods' Chosen." (How long before there is a Fornicator's Bible made available?)
To confirm this fact for yourself, simple go to Biblegateway.com which has 45 English translations of the bible, some with several editions or the BlueLetterBible.org site with 18 English translations, but neither site has the Moffat or the Fenton.
Could it be that someone reading / studying either the Moffat or Fenton translation just might begin to understand that the jews are not "God's Chosen?" That "judeo-christianity" is an oxymoron?
That the 12 Tribes of Israel are the kinsmen who the Kinsman Redeemer redeemed?
And God forbid! that the Anglo-Saxon-Scandinavian-Celtic-Germanic and kindred peoples are the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel? And that it was these very peoples, the lost sheep of the house of Israel, and not the Chinese, or the Koreans, or the Aborigines of Australia, that Paul and the other apostles were sent to share the gospel with, that is, the good news that the Kinsman Redeemer had come to fulfill the promises made to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel and to them alone?
Monday, February 18, 2013
My experience has been that no matter how friendly I am, no matter how circumspect I am with presenting aspects of my Waltenschauung with others, if there is no almost immediate agreement, they are the party to separate, to exclude or cut off their communication. [separate: aphorizo - to set off by boundary, limit, exclude]
Speak is a verb, an action word. I am commanded to "speak (what you believe to be) the truth with love." Ephesians 4:15 For simply doing what we are commanded to do, (see verses 11-14) there is erected, by them, a boundary between us.
For this we should be glad.
"Blessed are you when men hate you and when they separate from you and they reproach and they cast out your name as evil because of the Son of Man. Rejoice in that day and leap for joy; for, behold your reward is great in heaven; for in the like manner did their fathers unto the prophets."
This response is nothing new. The prophets were separated from - and stone - since the beginning. This response is in fact, quite common. And to be expected.
Repent ( metanoeó) is also a verb meaning to "re-think." Few there are who are willing to re-think their thinking, rethink their understanding, change their mind and to turn in another direction once they realize they were in error. What matters is: are we are doing our will, what we think we should be doing, or the will of our Father, which is in heaven?
Rewards are not handed out to everyone who believes they deserve one: but to those who do the Father's will. 2
1 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that does the will of my Father which is in heaven. 22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? 23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity. (Matthew 7)
These people think they are doing "many wonderful works," when in fact, they are "workers of iniquity." "The first shall be last, and the last shall be first."
Those who we least expect may just be those who rise to the top step in "that day."
Posted by Kerux at 8:10 AM
Saturday, February 16, 2013
This missive is written with the experiences of having lived outside of these United States for almost 13 years.
I’ve lived in four different countries and traveled in over 25.
For several months I was the manager of the largest hotel on Corn Island, Nicaragua, on the Caribbean Sea. While there I worked with the Mestizo / Caribbean blacks and dealt every day with the native Nicaraguans and travelers from all over the world.
I lived six years in Thailand, working with the most educated Thai people.
I lived and worked in Qatar for several months, interacting with Muslims from Iran, South Africa, Iraq, the UAE and many other parts of the world.
I lived five years in South Korea working with the most educated Koreans.
I didn’t just vacation in these countries, enjoying the best these nations had to offer. I lived and experienced day-to-day life living in a foreign culture, among non-Caucasians who do not think, act or believe like Caucasians think, act or believe.
In my 13 years abroad, I learned – contrary to what I had been led to believe – non-Caucasians are not like me. I learned that diversity was not a strength.
I have nothing against those people.
Do you know what? Wanting to live with and be around your own people – your own kind - I learned - is normal. Kind after kind.
While living abroad, I noticed something – people tend to congregate with their own kind. Caucasians would associate with fellow Caucasians and Asians with fellow Asians. Kind after kind.
Again, people wanting to be around their own kind, I came to realize, is normal.
Never once did I hear the Koreans say: “Gee, we just don’t have enough non-Koreans here, not enough Filipinos, not enough Indonesian, not enough Japanese. We need to allow more non-Koreans in. After all, diversity is our strength.”
Which brings us to the question: Whose Nation Are These United States, Anyway?
The answer, I believe, is found in the
Preamble - U.S. Constitution
We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Posterity means – from one progeny; from one common ancestry.
Our Northern European ancestors were willing to lay down their lives to give us what became the greatest nation in man’s history.
Sadly, we are losing it, without a whimper.
We can see from the Ted Kennedy quote below that there was concern that the ethnic mix of our country would change if the 1965 Immigration Act passed.
"First, our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same.... Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset.... Contrary to the charges in some quarters, [the bill] will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area, or the most populated and deprived nations of Africa and Asia.... In the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the proposed measure is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to think." Ted Kennedy, chief Senate sponsor of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965. (U.S. Senate, Subcommittee on Immigration and Naturalization of the Committee on the Judiciary, Washington, D.C., Feb. 10, 1965. pp. 1–3.)
Despite what traitor Ted had to say,
Since 1965 our cities have been flooded with millions of non-Caucasian immigrants annually.
Since 1965 the level of immigration has changed substantially.
Since 1965, the ethnic mix of our country has been upset.
Since 1965, America has been inundated with immigrants from the most populated and deprived nations of Africa, Asia and Central America.
At current immigration levels, our children and their children will be minorities in our own nation by 2050.
Some of you may be thinking: “Oh, it’s racist to think like you do.”
I understand that thinking.
We Caucasians, worldwide, have been programmed to think that way. That is why we Caucasians stand by and do nothing while our nations – Germany, France, Sweden, the UK - are invaded by non-Caucasians.
Quite often, living outside the US was not easy. I’ve learned my lesson the hard way.
I’m here to tell you what I learned:
Being “racist” is normal. To want to be around your own people is normal.
To want to preserve your country for your own kind, is normal. Kind after kind.
Most non-Caucasians preserve their nations, their way of life, for their own people. To do so is normal.
For me, the answer to the question, Whose nation are these United States, anyway?
Is - it is our nation.
Despite what we have been led to believe, it is normal - it is natural - to want to keep it that way.
Shortly after relocating to a new town, I discovered a local 6 a.m. Saturday morning bible study. The small gathering was led by a man who also led a prison ministry some four hours drive away. He was quick to let me know that in the 18 years he had been leading the prison ministry and driving to and fro all those years, that he never had to cancel a meeting because of illness, car trouble or weather. Obviously, God had been guiding and overseeing that ministry all those years, right?
During the third meeting of this study group composed mostly of elderly men, we were looking at 2 Timothy 1. As is my lifelong custom, I was prepared for the study by having studied the passage in the week leading up to the gathering. One of the other members initiated the early morning discussion by relating how he had picked up a woman he saw walking on the side of the road. He discovered she was on the way to the pharmacy to purchase medicine for her child. The problem was, she didn't have the money and didn't yet know how she was going to pay for what she needed to help alleviate her child's ailment. The man, with watery eyes, went on telling his story of how the Lord used this women's faith to reach his conscience. He related how the Lord moved him, despite his own the lack of funds, to supply her needs.
With that as the take-of point, the leader of the group went on for several minutes praising this bible study member for using his gifts of mercy and giving to help another. He brought us to the well known passages in I Corinthians 12; how we all have differing gifts, and even if we are only the little finger on one hand, God can and will use us to meet the needs of other members of the body of Christ.
We then moved on to read and discuss 2 Timothy 1. When we reached verse 11: "Unto which I am appointed a preacher and an apostle and a teacher of the Gentiles," I asked, being the newest member of the group not wanting to impose, if I could comment? The bible study and prison ministry leader spoke up and said, "Sure, we encourage participation. What do you have to contribute?" I said that the word Gentile is a Latin word and should not be in the verse, or any other verse in the New Testament. The Greek word used by Paul here was ethnos, and means nation, and should be translated nations, not Gentile, which has come to mean "non-jew."
Saying those words was like I had passed the worst gas imaginable. No, it was worse than that, I had committed blasphemy; I had questioned the King James Version of the bible, which I was soon to be told, in no uncertain terms, was THE inspired word of God. How dare I suggest that there was an error in the translation that has brought salvation to so many millions of Christians down through the ages?
I went on to explain, which I knew, from many similar experiences, was going to be a futile attempt, that a misunderstanding of the word ethnos, as Gentile, and not nation or nations, would lead the bible student to numerous errors of interpretation, errors that would cause nothing but confusion in trying to understand what Scripture teaches concerning who Paul is trying to reach when he uses the word ethnos. He is not talking about non-jews, he is talking about fellow Israelites.
Boy, did that set off the fireworks of indignation. The leader starting defending the authorized King James Version as being used by God to save countless souls for hundreds of years. He even raised his KJV translation in his left hand and declared: THIS is the inspired word of God! "The original Hebrew and Greek scriptures are the inspired word of God, not the multitude of translations," I replied. "Were those tablets Moses took down the mountain written in the KFV?
More indignation, this time from the man who had the gift of mercy and compassion not more than ten minutes earlier. He spoke up, his anger barely contained. "You're pissing me off, and you don't want to piss me off," he said, as he rose from his chair and walked away from the table to cool off.
I then said to the rest of the group, "No more than 10 minutes ago you all were going on about how we each have a gift or gifts to be used for the edification of others. I've been told by many I have the gift of teaching. I'm simply exercising my gift when I tell you that the Latin word Gentile should not be used in an English translation of the bible because it causes confusion, even deception. How is it that the gift of mercy is quite acceptable, and is encouraged to be used for the benefit of the rest of the body, but the gift of teaching is not to be used and the teaching is not to be accepted? You haven't disagreed that the word Gentile is Latin, and the original is ethnos, which means nation. So, what is the problem?"
The "leader" then asked, "What does this have to do with the saving of souls for Christ?"
I said, "Once one understands who Paul is speaking to, and who the gospel is for, it makes all the difference in the kingdom."
The leader then raised his KJV of the bible into the air and proclaimed with a loud voice: "THIS IS THE INSPIRED WORD OF GOD! It has been used by God to save millions of souls, including mine and everyone here in this room."
By this time, I had made my point. By this time I knew I would be wasting time and my breath. I closed my bible, which just happens to be a Scofield Reference Bible, by which I had been deceived by for most of my life, told the group good morning, and walked out.
No doubt I had created quite a stir, upsetting that group of righteous Judeo-Christians who then most likely spent the rest of the meeting despising me and what I had to say. Luke 23:11.
The saddest aspect of this episode is that this same scene could be repeated in Judeo-Christian-zionist congregations in all white nations today. No one caring that they are being deceived. No one questioning the status quo. No one daring to think other than what most of their small group of narrow-minded brainwashed fellow pew-sitters think, as they sit listening week after week to flat stone teaching. No one reflecting on what was just said and asking themselves "Gee, what if he is right? What if God sent that man to our little group to wake us up and we didn't listen?"
"He that hath an ear to hear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches." Revelation 3:22 KJV
Note: Some readers may be asking How is translating ethnos as Gentiles rather than nations causing confusion? The reason is most Judeo-Christians, an oxymoron, believe Christ came to save the jews not non-jews, i.e., the Gentiles. The reality is, in Christ's own words, "I have not come but to the lost sheep of the house of Israel." The house of Israel are the descendants of the 12 Tribes of Israel, not to be confused with jews. The 12 Tribes were and are the Anglo-Saxon-Scandinavian-Celtic-Germanic and kindred peoples. These tribes were scattered about the known world during the time of the apostles. The White race was the scattered "strangers of I Peter 1, the elect race of I Peter 2:9 and the twelve tribes scattered abroad of James 1:1.
The Blue Letter Bible has even gone so far, to continue the deception, to alter the meanings used in the online version of Strong's Concordance. Many many instances can be found where additional meanings have been added to Strong's Lexicon. Don't confuse the jew who reside in Palestine today with the Israelites of the Old and New Covenants.
Wednesday, January 09, 2013
There have been less than 15 convictions and executions for treason in US history. Why so few in 237 years? Unless I am a complete idiot, it seems to me there has been quite a bit of treasonous activity within our nation within my lifetime.
Here is what the US Constitution has to say about treason:
U.S. Constitution - Article 3 Section 3
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
Notice how treason is against the United States, and that the word "them" and "their" is used, referring to the (individual) States collectively.
What would constitute an "overt" act? We almost immediately think of spying.
But what about capturing control of all the States' money supply? (Notice again it's States. That’s us – we the people.) And then reduce the value of the people's currency to 3% of its value in 100 years. Would that result be an overt act of treason against the people of the United States?
Or, would simply creating money out of thin air and buying a huge portfolio of US Treasury debt, when no one else will, enabling our government to go beyond the point of no return with a monetarily unpayable load of debt upon the people of the United States, and thus destroying the country, be an overt act of treason?
Or the Zero Interest Rate Policy punishing savers and elderly retirees dependent on the interest earned by their savings?
Seems to me there are several causes of actions that could be taken against the Federal Reserve System, the chairmen, owners and other stockholders, for treason.
The problem is, the entire system is so corrupted by treasonous activity, that no trials of this nature are likely.Unless of course, we the people, through the States, take responsibility.
Posted by Kerux at 7:28 AM