The Baltic Tragedy - Nazi Liberation of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania from Jewish Bolshevik Soviet Occupation

Facts in this film you won't find on Wikipedia: the National Socialist Germans (aka "the evil Nazis") liberated the Latvians, Estonians and Lithuanians from  Jewish Bolshevik Communist occupation. The "Uncle Joe" Stalin led Soviet troops burned down entire villages and murdered thousands in their retreat for no reason other than because they were brutal occupiers filled with murder-lust.

Watch live early 1940s film footage as the rejoicing liberated in city after city  show their Liberators, the "evil German Nazis," their thanks with cheers, applause, waving kerchiefs, flowers and happy smiling faces. This is live footage, not a Hollywood fiction movie produced to deceive.

Those who know their history know the fate of the Latvians, Estonians and Lithuanians (and the Finns) was the same fate the Jewish Bolsheviks Communists had for all of Europe, if not for the "evil German Nazis."

Why isn't this film shown on the History Channel? Why hasn't Spielberg made a movie of this episode in Jewish Bolshevik history? I'll tell you why: Spielberg and his Hollywood cohorts are not interested in a truthful portrayal of history.

Be warned: this footage may well induce a bad case of cognitive dissonance for those still brainwashed by Jewish propaganda.

Some may want to consider the watching of this film as a sort of mental vaccine against future Jewish brainwashing.

Read More...

Summary only...

Details of Scripture

A Christian fellow recently told me I was too concerned with the "details of Scripture." That I was "striving about words to no profit" according to 2 Timothy 2:15. How do we know those "words" Paul was referring to were words found in Scripture? I asked.  The word we were discussing was found in Scripture and that the word this fellow said there was no profit in understanding was Gentile. I had pointed out Gentile is a Latin word and not found in the original Greek (or Hebrew for that matter) and, being a  Latin word,  should not be used in an English translation of either the Old or the New Testament.

The Importance of Context

Telling my acquaintance that context is important and needs to be considered, I pointed out that the very next verse in 2 Timothy 2, verse 16, Paul tells us to "study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth."

The reason it is important to know that Gentile is not in the original Greek New Testament is because that word is used to confuse and obfuscate the original Greek word, ethnos, which most times should be translated nations, not Gentiles. Today, a Gentile is often considered to be a "non-Jew," which is not the meaning of the word Gentile. Gentile is from the Latin genus, and meant, at the time of its use in the New Testament, one who is not a Roman citizen. 

Details in Scripture Are Important

The point is, it is important to know the details of Scripture. When Christ Himself was tempted of the devil to  "command that these stones be made bread," (Matthew 4:3) Christ answered and said, "It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds out of the mouth of God." Which words of God are we to ignore?Which words in Scripture are not important?

This fellow went on to tell me, quoting John 3:16,  that what was  important was that Jesus Christ is in your heart and that we share the love of Christ within us with others. In other words, the most important verse, and perhaps the only verse needed by a Christian, is John 3:16. "For God so loved the world that He gave his only beloved Son, that whosoever believes in him should not perish, but have everlasting life."

 Misuse of the Word "World"

I pointed out that the word "world," in the context of Scripture, doesn't mean the entire population of the world, but the Society of Israelites for whom Christ specifically said he came for:"I am not come save for the lost sheep of the house of Israel."

Surely the word "world" as used in Luke 2 when Caesar Augustus sent out a decree that the world should be registered, the entire "world" is not meant. The Chinese, the Aborigines or the Polynesians of the South Sea or the African tribes in the heart of the jungles of the Dark Continent, were not included. Neither are they included in John 3:16, despite what Christian missionaries erroneously believe. Nor was the faith of the Romans "spoken of throughout the whole world," (Romans 1:8) but only throughout the known Roman world or Society, centered around the Mediterranean Sea region during the time of Paul and his missionary journeys to his fellow Israelites, preaching the gospel to the lost sheep of the house of Israel, as commanded by Jesus Christ.

Every word, in the original languages of Scripture, Hebrew and Greek, is important and put there for a reason. A good reason. If Christ declared that not even "one jot or one tittle  shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled," should we not also be concerned with entire words, their meaning, context and proper application when we study and live by every word that proceeds out of the mouth of God?

Read More...

Summary only...

Heap Coals of Fire Upon His Head

Today, being the 25th of November, I read Proverbs 25 where we find: 21 If thine enemy be hungry, give him bread to eat; and if he be thirsty, give him water to drink: 22 For thou shalt heap coals of fire upon his head, and the Lord shall reward thee.

Paul quotes this verse in Romans 12:20.

Paul is writing to the Israelites in Rome, not everyone, everywhere. Enemies here are fellow Israelites that are, unfortunately, at odds with each other, are opposing one another.

"Thou shalt heap coals of fire upon his head ... " has been an idiom quite misunderstood. Read any commentary on this subject to prove this for yourself.

In the ancient world, walled cities were built to protect the occupants of an area from attacking invaders. During an invasion, the inhabitants would seek safety within the walls of the city. 

Often, the invaders would lay siege upon the city constructing sloping ramparts of rocks and soil to reach the top of the wall to allow their armies to breach the walled-in city. Also,  the main entrance gate of the city might be rammed with a trunk of a tree - a battering ram -  by several men working in unison - to break down the formidable barrier and allow entrance. 

Those inside the city walls did not stand idly by waiting for their attackers' success. Those within the walls would shoot arrows, throw sizable rocks and debri down upon the heads of their attackers. 

They would also build fires within the walls producing coals. Those hot coals were carried to the top of the walls in metal containers. These burning coals would then be rained down up their enemies working hard to gain entrance below the wall and do those within the city harm. 

Obviously, these hot coals were an effective deterrent to such activity and did much damage to those working fervently below.

This practice is, I believe, where the idiomatic term "for thou shalt heap coals of fire upon his head" originated. 

The lesson here is: find a need our kinsman, but temporary enemy has, and meet it. If he is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him drink. By not avenging ourselves and returning the evil being done to us but instead, by doing good and not evil to those who oppose us, we use an effective means to get our enemy to stop their attack. We use good, rather than evil.

We heap coals of fire upon his head. 

Should your enemy not accept your peaceful overtures of good, rather than evil, he will then have to deal with the Lord, who has promised vengeance on your behalf; but only if you do not take vengeance yourself.

I pity the man who does not cease from his attack after having coals of fire heaped upon his head.

Read More...

Summary only...

The Last Days of the Big LIe

Read More...

Summary only...

THE WRATH OF THE AWAKENED SAXON

by Rudyard Kipling

It was not part of their blood,
It came to them very late,
With long arrears to make good,
When the Saxon began to hate.

They were not easily moved,
They were icy -- willing to wait
Till every count should be proved,
Ere the Saxon began to hate.

Their voices were even and low.
Their eyes were level and straight.
There was neither sign nor show
When the Saxon began to hate.

It was not preached to the crowd.
It was not taught by the state.
No man spoke it aloud
When the Saxon began to hate.

It was not suddently bred.
It will not swiftly abate.
Through the chilled years ahead,
When Time shall count from the date
That the Saxon began to hate.

Read More...

Summary only...

Thou Shalt Not Adulterate the White Adamic Race

"Thou shalt not commit adultery" is the 7th Commandment given to the Israelites, a line of the Adamic Race traced through Jacob/Israel.

(These people are not to be confused with the current Askenazi jews who have illegally occupied Palestine)

What does do not adulterate mean? 

adulterate: to corrupt, debase, or make impure by the addition of a foreign or inferior substance.

To not commit adultery is not talking about having sexual relations with someone outside of marriage.

That prohibition is covered in the 10th Commandment: Thou shalt not covet your neighbor’s wife, or his manservant or maidservant, his ox or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbor.

The Commandment against adultery refers to race mixing, miscegenation: Thou shalt not mix bloods is the literal meaning.

What do we have today in the Western world? An epidemic of race mixing, of adulterating the white race, of corrupting the white race, of making the white race impure.

The deliberate genocide of the White race by the Zionist Jewish controlled entertainment industry.

Watch for yourself. 

Read More...

Summary only...

BYD Pastor Dan's Community Call - Live & Recorded Episodes:

BYD Pastor Dan's Community Call - Live & Recorded Episodes:

Read More...

Summary only...

Reality for Whites

Read More...

Summary only...

Not Guilty of Income Tax Evasion

http://Truthattack.org

Read More...

Summary only...

Flat Stone Teachers and Flat Stone Teaching

Flat Stone Teachers (FST) are those who skip over controversial passages / verses of Scripture, especially those that conflict with their current Weltanschauung.

Flat Stone Teaching is teaching that starts with a favorite passage from which an entire sermon is based and then skips from that one favorite out-of-context passage to other out-of-context passages, passages that seem to support the Flat Stone Teacher's currently held beliefs and teaching.

That is, unless one actually studies the passages in historical and biblical context and in the original - Hebrew and Greek - languages using several sources so as to conform to the Scriptural mandate of everything being supported by "two or three witnesses."

Most of the audience - and they are audiences, as they attend the "church services" to be entertained by the music director's entertainment program for that particular service - will not know or neither will they care if the teaching is as twisted as a pretzel - as long as their itching ears are scratched and the FST gets them back on their Lazy Boy, the remote and their beer before the start of their next entertainment for the day - the in season Beasts and Ball Game. And as nary a week separates one season from another now, the church goer goes from one form of entertainment to another uninterrupted.

This system has the masses worshiping the doctrine of devils, the beasts / icons of the (football) fields and the doctrine of Baal.  Meanwhile their entire culture is being destroyed and if and when they interrupt their entertainment cycle long enough to actually think about the destruction taking place around them, are completely clueless as to the cause. 

The "pastor's" flat stone teaching will keep the audience in a state of total ignorance for another week, until the next week's Judeo-Christian, ie, Scofield/Darbyism Baal doctrine of the jews being "God's Chosen" and "diversity is our strength" universalism programming is delivered.

Bring up the fact that the FST skipped right over the verse or verses that contradict what the FST was teaching, and you're immediately labeled a trouble maker, a division maker or worse. Nevermind that you can run circles around the FST and his flat stone teaching, no one wants to know what you  think.

I actually had a "leader" of a particular church tell me

The points you make seem logical – when you start with your position on Gen 3 (:15)  – but are so radically different from where I am at today that I’m not willing to simply “jump ship” so to speak and embrace them.

In other words, "how can you, even though the points you make seem logical, be right, when what you say is so radically different from what my FST teaches, and what I and everyone else believes?"

"Baaa baaa. I'm going to go with the sheeple, rather than what the Word of God says, because who are you among so many?"

Thank Yahweh that Noah, Joshua and Caleb, Jeremiah and all the rest did what Yahweh commanded them, rather than what everyone else was thinking should be done.  

Read More...

Summary only...

Common Interpretation Mistakes

Common mistakes many make when reading / studying Scripture or even ancient history:
(Any history for that matter.)

Bringing to the time period under study 
the attitudes and understanding they currently have
and applying it to the time period under study.

One such example is the believe that the Ethiopian of Acts 8 was a black man. 

Where does the idea come from that Ethiopia was a nation inhabited by blacks 2000 hundred years ago? Is it because Ethiopia today is a black nation?

Another common mistake is thinking the known world in biblical times was thought to be as large as the world as we know it today. 2000 years ago, there were few globes or world maps, no GPS, no satellite views of the earth from space. No airplanes, trains, automobiles, etc. People did not travel except in large armed groups for fear of robbery or worse. Very little travel far from one's hometown was done by 99 percent of the population. Most people, if they went anywhere, walked. A few went by horse, the wealthier by wagon / coach; a few by boat and fewer still by ship.

Many people 2000 years ago believed the world to be flat. People fell off the edge of the earth if they went too far on the oceans.

Reading was rare, books few. In fact, personally, they didn't have books - they had clay tablets, then scrolls of parchments rolled up and kept only by the very wealthy or in libraries. I read somewhere that one "educated" person at that time had the largest known private library  - 12 scrolls. People would travel long distances to visit his "library" of 12 volumes.

The known world - known by our ancestors, the Greeks and the Romans, was the area around the Mediterranean Sea - pretty much the region covered by Paul in his journeys. The Phoenicians (also Israelites) did travel out beyond the Med Sea through the Straits of Gibraltar - but it was they who most likely started the rumor of falling off the edge of the earth so as to protect their sea trading and merchant monopoly.

Josephus, although somewhat tedious at times, has a wealth of background information that is a must read for serious bible students.


Context, context, context is extremely important to get a proper understanding of the history of the time under study. Thinking was different 2000 years ago; knowledge of many subjects was much more limited then than it is today. One has to put themselves back into that time frame, that frame of reference existing at the time under study to acquire a proper understanding of the events and world views of most people during that period of history.

Read More...

Summary only...

The Word “World” in the Scriptures

“…The whole world is gone after him.” John 12:19

Did the whole world go after Christ?

“Then went all Judea and were baptized of him in Jordan.” Matthew 3:5

Was all Judea or Jerusalem baptized in the Jordan?

“We know we are of God and the whole world lieth in the wicked one.” I John 5:19

Does the “whole world” here mean everyone? If so, how is it then that there were some who were “of God?”

The words 'world' and 'all' are used in some seven or eight senses in Scripture; and it is very rarely that 'all' means all persons, taken individually. 

(Charles H. Spurgeon, Particular Redemption, A Sermon, 28 Feb 1858)

Romans 10:18

"But I say, Have they not heard? Yes verily, their (those preaching the gospel) sound went into all the earth, and their words unto the ends of the world."

Did those preaching have their sound “go into all the world, unto the ends of the world?”

And it came to pass in those days, that there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus that all the world should be taxed.  Luke 2:1

Was “all the world” taxed? 

Probably the most quoted Bible verse, John 3:16:

"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life."

Did God so love the entire “world” and did or does “whosoever believeth”  have everlasting life? 

What sayeth the Scripture? 

 Matthew 15:24
But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.

Who did Yahshua Christ send his disciples to?

Matthew 10:6

 ¹And when he had called unto him his twelve disciples, he gave them power against unclean spirits, to cast them out, and to heal all manner of sickness and all manner of disease.
 ²Now the names of the twelve apostles are these; The first, Simon, who is called Peter, and Andrew his brother; James the son of Zebedee, and John his brother;
 ³Philip, and Bartholomew; Thomas, and Matthew the publican; James the son of Alphaeus, and Lebbaeus, whose surname was Thaddaeus;
 ⁴Simon the Canaanite, and Judas Iscariot, who also betrayed him.
 ⁵These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not:

 ⁶But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.

Read More...

Summary only...

Does God Love All People?

 _________________________________________

We hear it constantly: "God loves all the peoples of the world equally."
 
"God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son...."


But does God love everyone?


Most serious bible students  can immediately come up with one exception found in Malachi 1, and that would be Esau:

Malachi 1

 ¹The burden of the word of the LORD to Israel by Malachi.
 ²I have loved you, saith the LORD. Yet ye say, Wherein hast thou loved us? Was not Esau Jacob's brother? saith the LORD: yet I loved Jacob,
 ³And I hated Esau, and laid his mountains and his heritage waste for the dragons of the wilderness.

And here in Malachi God's hate for Esau is contrasted with his love for Jacob - meaning the Israelites.

There is another incident where we find that God, manifested as the Lord Jesus Christ,  didn't express love to all peoples - and neither did his disciples, and that was to the Canaanite woman of Matthew 15. The fact is, Yahshua called her a "dog."

If we go back to one of the very first books of the Bible, we find God has a special relationship with one peoples of the world and one people only, the Israelites:

Deuteronomy 7:6
For thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God: the LORD thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth.

Did God somehow change his mind? And start loving all the peoples of the world equally with the "special people,"  the Israelites? 


Not that this writer can find. God didn't change His mind. 


The Israelites in particular and Adamic man in general are the recipients of God's love.


Let's mention just one more example for those who don't think the three given above are sufficient. Let's look at the parable of the net.

Matthew 13:47-50 (KJV)

 ⁴⁷Again, the kingdom of heaven is like unto a net, that was cast into the sea, and gathered of every kind: ⁴⁸Which, when it was full, they drew to shore, and sat down, and gathered the good into vessels, but cast the bad away. ⁴⁹So shall it be at the end of the world: the angels shall come forth, and sever the wicked from among the just, ⁵⁰And shall cast them into the furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.

The word translated as "kind" in English is Strong's #G1085 genos defined as

1) kindred

a) offspring

b) family

c) stock, tribe, nation

1) i.e. nationality or descent from a particular people

d) the aggregate of many individuals of the same nature, kind, sort

Universalists like to believe this word "kind" means "unbelievers." Of course, as we can see from the definition above, it doesn't: genos means family, stock, kindred or nation. 

At the end of the age, despite what universalists and multiculturalists believe in the depths of their hearts, it will not be the unbelievers who will be cast into the furnace of fire. 

No, Scripture plainly teaches it will be the bad kind (nations) who will be severed from the just kind nations.

Folks, that is what Scripture says: we Christian Identity adherents are not making this doctrine up: we are simply bringing to light the long hidden  truth of the Word of God.

As the saying goes, "get over it."

And yes, there will be wailing and gnashing of teeth; the teeth of the bad kind nation's peoples who bought into the false idea that "God so loved the world" and I suspect the universalists and multi-culturalists will be gnashing their teeth as they are proven to be wrong, dead wrong.

Read More...

Summary only...

The Key Verse For Understanding Scripture and History

Genesis 3:15

And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.

Who is "thee"?

Nachash - http://screencast.com/t/haH3h8caK and http://screencast.com/t/MXJPv3MTjq8

Or Shining Enchanter.

Hebrew seed is zera Strong's # H2233

Red seed = zera

Blue seed = zera

Therefore both seeds or offspring, must be physical as no one argues that Eve's offspring was physical.

If Eve's offspring was physical, Nachash's (thee, thy seed)  must also be physical, or God's Word would have used a different word for seed for Nachash's seed.

The result of the seduction of Eve by the Enchanter was Cain. At the same time as Eve was seduced, ADam was not seduced, but was part of the transgression, that is he partook of the sexual sin - and the results from that union was Abel.

Being pregnant with two different embryos from two different men, although rare, is known as  superfecundation.

Notice it was Yahweh who put the enmity, or hatred, between the seedline of satan and the (Adamic) seedline of Eve.

This God given enmity between the two seedlines explains much of the Bible and history.

One can follow the conflict between the two seedlines throughout the Bible and throughout history.

Read More...

Summary only...

Are You Feeding on Milk or Solid Food?

One of the major reasons so many judeo-Christians are so easily deceived is they suck and swallow milk, skipping over the difficult and oftentimes controversial passages of Scripture, the meat. Given the meat of the word, they choke. Solid food is avoided at all cost. These solid food avoiding Christians thus remain babes in Christ.

Their judeo-Christian pastor feeds "his" lambs milk, week after week, by which they are never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. Truth is the meat, the solid food of teachers.

"For everyone that uses milk is inexperienced in the word of righteousness; for he is a babe. But solid food belongs to them that are of full age, those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil." Hebrews 5:13-14

These spiritual children are "tossed and carried about with every wind of teaching by the deceitful unprincipled cunning of men, with a view to systematized error."
Instead, we are to hold the truth in love, we may grow up to Him in all things." Ephesians 4:14-15.

The number of immature Christians one encounters in the typical judeo-Christian congregation is astonishing. An entire meeting hall of immature sheep being sheared regularly to support their flat stone teacher-pastor, foreign missionaries casting the pearl of the Gospel to the dogs, and every third world charity that comes through town with their hand out.

Where are the mature Christians Paul wished for? (II Corinthians 13:9) Paul said he could do "nothing against the truth, but only for the truth." (verse 8) Maturity is tied to truth. Without truth there is no "completeness, " no maturing.
We have today in the world, an entire generation of baby Christians. They have never grown up. Darn near impossible to have an adult conversation with these baby judeo-Christians. Bring up a mature adult topic, anything dealing with the truth, the solid food of the word, and immediately hackles are raised and the bleating starts. "What you are telling me can't be the truth, as that's not what my pastor (and everyone else around me) believes.

As individual workmen we are to study the word for ourselves, so that we ourselves are workmen that need not be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. 2 Timothy 2:15. How ashamed most of the judeo-Christians I meet should be. They have been and are being deceived, and so easily, simply because they avoid the strong food of the word, the truth, and instead are being led astray by "jewish fables." Titus 1:14

Only those those who desire to remain immature avoid truth.

The remedy is simple: stop skipping over those passages of Scripture that disagree with your current paradigm, study the word beneath the surface, dig deep into the original languages, don't avoid those controversial topics and rightly divide, rightly discern the word of God.

Then, armed with the truth, live your life so that others desire what you possess. Be doers of the Word, not readers only.

Read More...

Summary only...

Flat Stone Teaching

Have you noticed that most men who fancy themselves bible teachers are flat stone teachers? (FSTs)

By flat stone I mean they skip from one passage to another when they teach. They'll ask you to turn your bibles to such and such a verse, read the verse, expound on it for a few minutes, usually completely out of context, and then ask you to turn with them to another verse which may have the same word or theme as the verse they just left. Then for the next few minutes they'll explain to their listeners what they think that verse means, again completely out of context.

Flat stone teachers never get more than an inch below the surface. They never go deep.

Their bible knowledge, be what it is, is an inch deep and a mile wide.

Flat stone teaching, skipping from one passage to another, can avoid difficult and controversial passages by skipping right over them!

FSTs use this skimming and skipping over water - water is a symbol of the word of God - teaching week after week, month after month, skipping over difficult and controversial passages all the while.

I listened to a flat stone teacher expound on Matthew 8:5-13 recently. He read and "taught" his way from verse five to verse ten, skipping right over the two verses he appeared to not understand ( I watched with great interest as what cognitive dissonance looks like was being shown to me) and knew would not set well with his universalist itching ears listeners, to finish with verse 13; how great the Roman centurion's faith was and because of that faith his request was granted. Oh, if only we could have that kind of faith, right?

Too bad this flat stone teacher doesn't have faith in the Word of God to teach its truth, no matter how unpopular that truth may be.

Here is the two verses Matthew 8:11, 12, the FST skipped over:
11 I say to you that many will come from east and west, and [m]recline at the table with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven; 12 but the sons (not of Jacob, but of Esau) of the kingdom will be cast out into the outer darkness; in that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.”

This FST skipped to Matthew 8 from the passage in Matthew 15 dealing with the Syrophenican woman whom Yahshua "answered her not a word," and whom the disciples asked the Lord to "send her away, for she crieth (croak, like the cry of a raven) after us."

The FST's explanation for why Yahsua called her a "dog," was because of the "place she was at." What did "place" have to do with why he at first refused to even talk to her?

Nothing.

Her race, (Canaanite - see verse 22) not her place, is why Yahshua refused to talk to her and called her a dog. (In English, because she was female, we could call her a "bitch.") Her request was granted because she agreed she was a dog, and unworthy, not being a child of the Master. But her argument was, "even the little dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from the master's table."

Nothing is said of salvation, just that her daughter was healed. Magnanimous acts such as this are often granted to the undeserving by those in high positions.

Did the FST see the true reason the Roman centurion, obviously an Israelite, was accorded completely different treatment than the Canaanite woman? No, it went right over his head, the same way his teaching skims right over the water.

Consequently, all of those sitting under the feet of this teacher were once again fed milk, skimmed milk, pardon the pun, instead of the meat and truth of the Word of Yahweh.

Oh, how the truth of Yahweh would wake up His People to their rightful place as heirs of the promises made to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob!

"I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the House of Israel."

Read More...

Summary only...

Universalism and Pretzel Theology

Universalists have deceived themselves into believing that Yahweh has cast off His People, Israel, and is now dealing with non-Israelites, who have and are forming the "spiritual seed" of Abraham, Christ's "church," made up of all non-Adamic peoples (whom Yahweh did not breath the spirit of life into) who are not "born from above."

By creating this pretzel theology, they have to ignore numerous passages such as "I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the House of Israel."

"I will seek that which was lost."

"I will seek out my sheep."

"He who scattered (James 1:1) Israel will gather him, and keep him, as a shepherd does his flock."

"I am the good shepherd, the good shepherd giveth his life for his sheep"

"The Son of Man is come to save that which was lost"


Would Yahshua come to seek a people that did not exist?

Hardly, as Paul assures us in Romans 15:8 Yahshua came to "confirm the promises made unto the fathers."

What are the promises? One of them was the Everlasting Covenant Yahweh made with Abraham and his (physical) seed after him.

That is, the House of Israel.

Read More...

Summary only...

Asking, Seeking, Knocking

“Ask, and it will be given to you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you. 8 For everyone who asks receives, and he who seeks finds, and to him who knocks it will be opened. 9 Or what man is there of you, whom if his son ask bread, will he give him a stone? 10 Or if he ask a fish, will he give him a serpent? 11 If ye then, being evil, know how to give good gifts unto your children, how much more shall your Father which is in heaven give good things to them that ask him? 12 Therefore, all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets.”

Matthew 7:7-12

The word “ask” (G154 Greek - aiteō) has several meanings: to ask, beg, call for, crave, desire. A synonym is deomai – to want, desire, long for.

“Seek” (G2212 Greek – zētēo) carries the meaning to seek [in order to find out] by thinking, meditating, reasoning; to enquire into.

Knock (G2925 Greek – krouō) is to knock with determination. Like the lord who returned and knocked for entrance into his house. (Luke 12:36) Or Peter when he continued knocking at the gate. (Acts 12:16) Confidently knocking, expecting the door to be opened. Not timidly, ready to turn away if the door is not opened as soon as we would like.

This promise is for “everyone.” Everyone who desires, everyone who reasons, thinks, meditates upon his desire and everyone who knocks confidently expecting the door to be opened, receives his desire. “It will be opened.”

The thing desired must be worthwhile; bread, a fish, “good gifts,” “good things,” not a selfish asking.

Everyone, in order to receive, must keep asking, keep seeking and keep knocking.

All too often, we give up to easily.

The woman – who the Lord called a “little dog” in Matthew 15 – had her desire for her daughter to be healed due to her persistence: she didn’t give up simply because the disciples didn’t help her, or the Lord answered her not a word, or when He called her a dog.

She had an answer: “Even the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their master’s table.” For this answer, this saying, this logos, she had her daughter healed.

That woman was determined not to take no for an answer. She was persistent.

She desired a worthwhile thing; the evil spirit to be cast out of her daughter; she thought about how that could be done, she then went to the one who could solve her problem and reasoned with Him. She did not give up until she received her desire. She persevered.

She is an example of "everyone."

How much more will Yahshua give to us, his sons, if we would only desire, reason with Him as to why we should be given our desire and then keep knocking expecting to receive our request?

What is it you desire? Are you willing to meditate on your desires, think about how to achieve those desires, seek those desires and then knock until you receive them?

"You have not, because ye ask not."

Read More...

Summary only...

Lies of the Judeo-Zionist-Christendumbers

Let's look at some facts, rather than the lies we find everywhere in Judeo-Zionist-Christendom shall we?

1. The word "jew" was not even in the Hebrew or Greek - languages used to compose the Old and New Testaments, so how could either Jesus or Paul be a jew? when 'jew" didn't exist?

2. Yahshua was of the tribe of Judah. (Luke 3:33) It's now up to Judeo-Zionist-Christendumbers to show us the evidence, not just repeat their BS over and over again, that Jesus was a "jew."

3. Paul clearly states he was born of the tribe of Benjamin, (Phil. 3:8) not Judah. So again, the Judeo-Zionist-Christendumbers have the burden of proof to show us that descendants of Benjamin were "jews."

4. James wrote his epistle to the 12 tribes in the dispersion. The "lost" tribes.

1James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting. KJV

1 James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ,

To the twelve tribes scattered among the nations: NIV

James wrote his epistle to Israelites scattered among the Greek nations, (see below) not to fellow "jews."

5. Paul, through Luke, authored the book of Hebrews. Hebrews were the 12 tribes of Israel, the Israelites, not "Gentiles."

Christendumbers like others to believe "Paul was the apostle to the Gentiles." Why don't the Judeo-Zionist-Christendumbers show us the book written specifically to the non-jews or who they like us to believe are the "Gentiles?"

6. Here is a perfect example from John 7 of how the deception keeps getting perpetrated:

32 The Pharisees heard the crowd whispering such things about him. Then the chief priests and the Pharisees sent temple guards to arrest him.

33 Jesus said, “I am with you for only a short time, and then I am going to the one who sent me. 34 You will look for me, but you will not find me; and where I am, you cannot come.”

35 The Jews (sic - Judaeans) said to one another, “Where does this man intend to go that we cannot find him? Will he go where our people (Judeans) live scattered among the Greeks, and teach the Greeks?

Let's examine the orginal language from Blue Letter Bible

Then 3767 said 2036 the Jews 2453 among 4314 themselves 1438, Whither 4226 will 3195 he 3778 go 4198 , that 3754 we 2249 shall 2147 0 not 3756 find 2147 him 846? will 3361 3195 he go 4198 unto 1519 the dispersed 1290 among the Gentiles 1672, and 2532 teach 1321 the Gentiles 1672?

the Jews 2453
G2453 - Ioudaios
Ἰουδαῖος
From Ἰούδα (G2448) (in the sense of Ἰούδας (G2455) as a country)

G2455 G2448 - Iouda
Ἰούδα
Judah = "he shall be praised"

1) the fourth son of the patriarch Jacob
2) the tribe that were the offspring of Judah
3) the region occupied by the tribe
4) a city of the tribe of Judah, conjectured to be Hebron, which was a city assigned to the priests and located in the hill country, and the native place of John the Baptist according to Jewish tradition

Nothing in the definition of G2448 Iouda from which G2453 Ioudaios is derived about "jews."

So, tell us, Christendumbers, how do we get jews from Judah? Not everyone who resided in Judah, was a "jew" just like not everyone who lives in (the United States of) America is German, or Italian or Roman Catholic. Saying that all the people who resided in Judah at this time period was jewish, is like saying everyone who lives in California is Roman Catholic.

Ioudaios should be translated Judaeans, not jews. Been over this a thousand times; just like American.

among the Gentiles 1672
G1672 - Hellēn
Ἕλλην

1) a Greek either by nationality, whether a native of the main land or of the Greek islands or colonies

the dispersed 1290
G1290 - diaspora
διασπορά
1) a scattering, dispersion
a) of Israelites dispersed among foreign nations

The Judaeans knew there were Israelites dispersed among the Greek nations surrounding their "world," their Society, at that time.

Notice the Judaeans didn't think that Yahshua (Jesus) would go preaching to the dispersed "jews" among the Greeks (Hellen)

No where in Scripture does it say that "Gentiles" are to be preached to, because no where in Scripture is the word Gentile to be found. Why in the world would a Latin word, gentilis, be found in a Hebrew or Greek manuscript?

It wasn't. Not until Jerome translated the original languages into Latin do we find the Latin word Gentile, which, btw does not mean "non-jew" as the Judeo-Zionist-Christendumbers would have others believe.

But it does mean people of the same race or gens. A related Latin word, genea, is where we get the word genealogy. You know what genealogy means, don't you?

And yet, everywhere one goes - we find this definition: "a Gentile is a "non-jew."

Even jewwikipedia gets it right if you put in the correct search words: "Latin Gentile meaning"

The term Gentile (from Latin gentilis, by the French "gentil", female: "gentille", meaning of or belonging to a clan or tribe) refers to non-Israelite peoples or nations in English translations of the Bible.

Latin and subsequently English translators selectively used the term gentiles when the context for the base term "peoples" or "nations", Hebrew, גוי (goy) and נכרי (nokhri) in the Hebrew Bible and the Greek word ἔθνη (éthnē) in the New Testament, indicated non-Israelite peoples or nations. The term gentiles is derived from Latin, used for contextual translation, and not an original Hebrew or Greek word from the Bible.

And yet we have Judeo-Zionist-Christendumbers repeating this lie over and over - which is what the jews have done for centuries - lie.

Their lies that get repeated ad naseum without being challenged is why most people including the Judeo-Zionist-Christendumbers believe the word Gentile means non-jewish.

Read More...

Summary only...